Farhan Hasan Ali, Yaseen Israa Fadhil, Alomar Mohammed, Lenihan Daniel, Dent Susan, Lyon Alexander R
Scientific Council of Cardiology, Iraqi Board for Medical Specializations, Baghdad, Iraq.
Baghdad Heart Center, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 21;9:979631. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.979631. eCollection 2022.
Regional variations in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD management are well known. However, there is limited information on geographical variations in the discipline of Cardio-Oncology, including both the nature of CVD in patients with cancer and its management. Furthermore, during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, CV care for patients was disrupted resulting in an unknown impact on cardio-oncology services.
The aim of this study was to identify the regional variations in the management of CVD among patients with cancer and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the selection of cardiovascular drugs in cardio-oncology.
An online survey was conducted by the Iraq Chapter of the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). The survey was shared with cardiologists and oncologists in all seven continents to identify whether regional variations exist in cardio-oncology daily practice.
From April to July 2021, 140 participants responded to the survey, including cardiologists (72.9%) and oncologists (27.1%). Most of the respondents were from the Middle East (26.4%), North America (25%), Latin America and the Caribbean (25%), and Europe (20.7%). Baseline CV risk assessment in patients with cancer using the HFA/IC-OS score was reported in 75.7% of respondents (78.4% cardiologists and 68.4% oncologists). Hypertension was the most common CVD treated by the survey respondents globally (52.1%) unlike in Europe where heart failure was the most prominent CVD (51.7%). The blood pressure cutoff value to initiate hypertension management is >140/90 mmHg globally (72.9%), but in North America (48.6%) it was >130/80 mmHg. In the Middle East, 43.2% of respondents do not use cardioprotective medication. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 10.7% of respondents changed their practice, such as switching from prescribing ACEI to ARB. Apixaban is the main anticoagulant used in patients with cancer (32.9%); however, in cancer patients with COVID-19 infection, the majority used enoxaparin (31.4%).
More than three-quarters of cardiologists and oncologists responding to the survey are using HFA/IC-OS proformas. The survey showed regional variations in the management of CVD on different continents. The use of cardioprotective agents was limited in some regions including the Middle East. COVID-19 pandemic impacted daily practice on the selection and switching of cardiovascular drugs including ACEI/ARB and the choice of anticoagulants.
心血管疾病(CVD)及其管理的区域差异众所周知。然而,关于心脏肿瘤学领域的地理差异信息有限,包括癌症患者的心血管疾病性质及其管理。此外,在最近的新冠疫情期间,患者的心血管护理受到干扰,对心脏肿瘤学服务产生了未知影响。
本研究的目的是确定癌症患者心血管疾病管理的区域差异以及新冠疫情对心脏肿瘤学中心血管药物选择的影响。
国际心脏肿瘤学会(IC-OS)伊拉克分会开展了一项在线调查。该调查与各大洲的心脏病专家和肿瘤学家分享,以确定心脏肿瘤学日常实践中是否存在区域差异。
2021年4月至7月,140名参与者回复了调查,包括心脏病专家(72.9%)和肿瘤学家(27.1%)。大多数受访者来自中东(26.4%)、北美(25%)、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(25%)以及欧洲(20.7%)。75.7%的受访者(78.4%的心脏病专家和68.4%的肿瘤学家)报告使用HFA/IC-OS评分对癌症患者进行基线心血管风险评估。全球范围内,高血压是调查受访者治疗的最常见心血管疾病(52.1%),而在欧洲,心力衰竭是最突出的心血管疾病(51.7%)。全球范围内启动高血压管理的血压临界值为>140/90 mmHg(72.9%),但在北美为>130/80 mmHg(48.6%)。在中东,43.2%的受访者不使用心脏保护药物。在新冠疫情期间,10.7%的受访者改变了他们的做法,例如从开具ACEI改为ARB。阿哌沙班是癌症患者使用的主要抗凝剂(32.9%);然而,在感染新冠的癌症患者中,大多数使用依诺肝素(31.4%)。
超过四分之三回复调查的心脏病专家和肿瘤学家正在使用HFA/IC-OS表格。调查显示不同大陆在心血管疾病管理方面存在区域差异。包括中东在内的一些地区心脏保护药物的使用有限。新冠疫情影响了心血管药物(包括ACEI/ARB)的选择和更换以及抗凝剂选择的日常实践。