• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of the COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index in explaining COVID-19 deaths.《COVID-19 社区脆弱性指数在解释 COVID-19 死亡病例方面的有效性》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:953198. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.953198. eCollection 2022.
2
Examining Social Vulnerability and the Association With COVID-19 Incidence in Harris County, Texas.德克萨斯州哈里斯县的社会脆弱性与 COVID-19 发病率的关系研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;9:798085. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.798085. eCollection 2021.
3
Associations of 4 Geographic Social Vulnerability Indices With US COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality.4 个地理社会脆弱性指数与美国 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的关联。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Nov;112(11):1584-1588. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307018. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Factors Associated With Voluntary Refusal of Emergency Medical System Transport for Emergency Care in Detroit During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.与 COVID-19 大流行早期底特律紧急医疗系统自愿拒绝紧急护理转运相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20728.
5
Health disparities and COVID-19: A retrospective study examining individual and community factors causing disproportionate COVID-19 outcomes in Cook County, Illinois.健康差异与 COVID-19:一项回顾性研究,调查伊利诺伊州库克县导致 COVID-19 结果不成比例的个体和社区因素。
PLoS One. 2022 May 16;17(5):e0268317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268317. eCollection 2022.
6
The Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and COVID-19 Incidence Among Louisiana Census Tracts.路易斯安那州普查区社会脆弱性与 COVID-19 发病率之间的关系。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 20;8:617976. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.617976. eCollection 2020.
7
Association of Social and Demographic Factors With COVID-19 Incidence and Death Rates in the US.社会人口因素与美国 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2036462. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36462.
8
Using machine learning to develop a novel COVID-19 Vulnerability Index (C19VI).利用机器学习开发新型 COVID-19 脆弱性指数(C19VI)。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145650. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145650. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
COVID-19 vaccination rates vary by community vulnerability: A county-level analysis.**译文**: **新冠病毒疫苗接种率因社区脆弱性而异:一项县级分析**。
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 13;39(31):4245-4249. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.038. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Comparison of National Vulnerability Indices Used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the COVID-19 Response.比较疾病预防控制中心用于应对 COVID-19 的国家脆弱性指数。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jul-Aug;137(4):803-812. doi: 10.1177/00333549221090262. Epub 2022 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review and Assessment of the Area-Level Composite Measures That Estimate Social Determinants of Health Across the United States.对美国估计健康社会决定因素的地区层面综合指标的范围审查与评估
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jan-Feb;140(1):67-102. doi: 10.1177/00333549241252582. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
2
Integrating Social Drivers of Health into Hospital Ratings with Application to the 100 Top Hospitals Study.将健康的社会驱动因素纳入医院评级中——以 100 强医院研究为例。
Am J Med Qual. 2024;39(4):137-144. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000191. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Inequality in COVID-19 mortality in Quebec associated with neighbourhood-level vulnerability domains.魁北克 COVID-19 死亡率的不平等与社区脆弱性领域有关。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Feb;115(1):53-66. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00829-7. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Potential Epidemic Vulnerability and Socioepidemiological Profile of SARS-CoV2 in the Brazilian Northeast Region.巴西东北部地区新冠病毒的潜在流行脆弱性及社会流行病学概况
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 27;8(4):192. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8040192.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of a neighborhood-level COVID Local Risk Index in 47 large U.S. cities.验证 47 个美国大城市的邻里层面 COVID 本地风险指数。
Health Place. 2022 Jul;76:102814. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102814. Epub 2022 May 24.
2
Comparison of National Vulnerability Indices Used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the COVID-19 Response.比较疾病预防控制中心用于应对 COVID-19 的国家脆弱性指数。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jul-Aug;137(4):803-812. doi: 10.1177/00333549221090262. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Association Between Social Vulnerability and a County's Risk for Becoming a COVID-19 Hotspot - United States, June 1-July 25, 2020.社会脆弱性与一个县成为 COVID-19 热点地区的风险之间的关联 - 美国,2020 年 6 月 1 日至 7 月 25 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 23;69(42):1535-1541. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6942a3.
4
Social Vulnerability and Racial Inequality in COVID-19 Deaths in Chicago.《芝加哥 COVID-19 死亡中的社会脆弱性与种族不平等》。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):509-513. doi: 10.1177/1090198120929677. Epub 2020 May 21.

《COVID-19 社区脆弱性指数在解释 COVID-19 死亡病例方面的有效性》。

Effectiveness of the COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index in explaining COVID-19 deaths.

机构信息

Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:953198. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.953198. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.953198
PMID:36211696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9539452/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effectiveness of a COVID-19 specific social vulnerability index, we examined the relative importance of four COVID-19 specific themes and three general themes of the COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI) in explaining COVID-19 mortality rates in Cook County, Illinois.

METHODS

We counted COVID-19 death records from the Cook County Medical Examiner's Office, geocoded incident addresses by census tracts, and appended census tracts' CCVI scores. Negative binomial regression and Random Forest were used to examine the relative importance of CCVI themes in explaining COVID-19 mortality rates.

RESULTS

COVID-19 specific Themes 6 (High risk environments) and 4 (Epidemiological factors) were the most important in explaining COVID-19 mortality (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 6.80 and 6.44, respectively), followed by a general Theme 2 (Minority status & language, IRR = 3.26).

CONCLUSION

The addition of disaster-specific indicators may improve the accuracy of social vulnerability indices. However, variance for Theme 6 was entirely from the long-term care resident indicator, as the other two indicators were constant at the census tract level. Thus, CCVI should be further refined to improve its effectiveness in identifying vulnerable communities. Also, building a more robust local data infrastructure is critical to understanding the vulnerabilities of local places.

摘要

目的

为了探索 COVID-19 特定社会脆弱性指数的有效性,我们研究了 COVID-19 社区脆弱性指数(CCVI)中的四个 COVID-19 特定主题和三个一般主题在解释伊利诺伊州库克县 COVID-19 死亡率方面的相对重要性。

方法

我们统计了库克县法医办公室的 COVID-19 死亡记录,通过普查区对事件地址进行地理编码,并附加普查区的 CCVI 得分。使用负二项回归和随机森林来检验 CCVI 主题在解释 COVID-19 死亡率方面的相对重要性。

结果

COVID-19 特定主题 6(高风险环境)和 4(流行病学因素)在解释 COVID-19 死亡率方面最为重要(发病率比 (IRR) 分别为 6.80 和 6.44),其次是一般主题 2(少数族裔地位和语言,IRR = 3.26)。

结论

增加灾难特定指标可能会提高社会脆弱性指数的准确性。然而,主题 6 的方差完全来自长期护理居民指标,因为其他两个指标在普查区层面是恒定的。因此,CCVI 应该进一步细化,以提高其识别脆弱社区的效果。此外,建立更强大的本地数据基础设施对于了解本地的脆弱性至关重要。