Suppr超能文献

肉毒杆菌毒素微针给药与皮内注射治疗面部多汗症的比较

Microneedling Delivery of Botulinum Toxin Versus Intradermal Injection in the Treatment of Facial Hyperhidrosis.

作者信息

Ebrahim Howyda, Nassar Amany, Mousa Mariam Mohammed, Khater Elsayed

机构信息

Drs. Ebrahim, Nassar and Khater are with the Faculty of Medicine at Zagazig University in Zagazig, Egypt.

Dr. Mousa is with the Faculty of Medicine at Omar Al-Mukhtar University in Al Bayda, Libya.

出版信息

J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022 Sep;15(9):40-44.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current treatments of Facial hyperhidrosis (FH) are often limited and are associated with many adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to study the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin-A delivery by microneedling versus its intradermal injection in the treatment of FH. Forty-two patients with FH were subjected to microneedling (Mn) followed by topical application of BTX-A on one side of the face and intra-dermal injection of BTX-A on the other side. Two sessions were performed at two week intervals. The assessment tools were Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A score of one of HDSS was achieved in 85.7 percent of patients on the intradermally injected side versus 83.3 percent on the microneedling side (=0.76%). Most of the patients on the injection side responded with the first session while the microneedling side responded with the second one (<0.001). The DLQI was highly significant on both sides post-treatment (<0.001). The side effects were mild in the form of pain on the intradermally injected sides, and mild transient erythema on the microneedling side. The microneedling side showed higher patient satisfaction compared to the intradermally injected side.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques were safe and effective in controlling the FH. Microneedling delivery of BTX-A was less painful and had higher patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

目前面部多汗症(FH)的治疗方法往往有限,且伴有许多不良反应。

目的

研究微针注射肉毒杆菌毒素A与皮内注射肉毒杆菌毒素A治疗FH的疗效和安全性。42例FH患者一侧面部接受微针治疗(Mn),然后局部应用BTX - A,另一侧面部进行BTX - A皮内注射。每隔两周进行两次治疗。评估工具为多汗症疾病严重程度量表(HDSS)、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和患者满意度。

结果

皮内注射侧85.7%的患者HDSS评分为1分,微针治疗侧为83.3%(P = 0.76%)。注射侧的大多数患者在第一次治疗后有反应,而微针治疗侧在第二次治疗后有反应(P<0.001)。治疗后两侧的DLQI均有高度显著性差异(P<0.001)。副作用较轻,皮内注射侧表现为疼痛,微针治疗侧表现为轻度短暂红斑。与皮内注射侧相比,微针治疗侧患者满意度更高。

结论

两种技术在控制FH方面均安全有效。微针注射BTX - A疼痛较轻,患者满意度更高。

相似文献

10
Botulinum toxin: a treatment for compensatory hyperhidrosis in the trunk.肉毒杆菌毒素:一种治疗躯干代偿性多汗症的方法。
Dermatol Surg. 2009 May;35(5):833-8; discussion 838. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01140.x. Epub 2009 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

5
Hyperhidrosis: prevalence and impact on quality of life.多汗症:患病率及其对生活质量的影响。
J Bras Pneumol. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(4):292-298. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562017000000379. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
The Etiology of Primary Hyperhidrosis: A Systematic Review.原发性多汗症的病因:系统评价。
Clin Auton Res. 2017 Dec;27(6):379-383. doi: 10.1007/s10286-017-0456-0. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
8
Current and Emerging Medical Therapies for Primary Hyperhidrosis.原发性多汗症的现有及新兴医学疗法
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017 Mar;7(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0148-z. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
9
Impact of hyperhidrosis on quality of life and its assessment.多汗症对生活质量的影响及其评估
Dermatol Clin. 2014 Oct;32(4):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
10
Botulinum toxin B in the treatment of craniofacial hyperhidrosis.肉毒杆菌毒素B治疗颅面部多汗症
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Oct;28(10):1313-7. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12278. Epub 2013 Oct 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验