Farlay Delphine, Falgayrac Guillaume, Ponçon Camille, Rizzo Sébastien, Cortet Bernard, Chapurlat Roland, Penel Guillaume, Badoud Isabelle, Ammann Patrick, Boivin Georges
INSERM, UMR 1033, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, F-69008 Lyon, France.
Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Univ. Littoral Côte d'Opale, ULR 4490 - MABLab- Adiposité, Médullaire et Os, F-59000 Lille, France.
Bone Rep. 2022 Sep 29;17:101623. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101623. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The differences in bone nanomechanical properties between cortical (Ct) and trabecular (Tb) bone remain uncertain, whereas knowing the respective contribution of each compartment is critical to understand the origin of bone strength. Our purpose was to compare bone mechanical and intrinsic properties of Ct and Tb compartments, at the bone structural unit (BSU) level, in iliac bone taken from a homogeneous untreated human population. Among 60 PMMA-embedded transiliac bone biopsies from untreated postmenopausal osteoporotic women (64 ± 7 year-old), >2000 BSUs were analysed by nanoindentation in physiological wet conditions [indentation modulus (elasticity), hardness, dissipated energy], by Fourier transform infrared (FTIRM) and Raman microspectroscopy (mineral and organic characteristics), and by X-ray microradiography (degree of mineralization of bone, DMB). BSUs were categorized based on tissue age, osteonal (Ost) and interstitial (Int) tissues location and bone compartments (Ct and Tb). Indentation modulus was higher in Ct than in Tb BSUs, both in Ost and Int. dissipated energy was higher in Ct than Tb, in Int BSUs. Hardness was not different between Ct and Tb BSUs. In Ost or Int BSUs, mineral maturity (conversion of non-apatitic into apatitic phosphates) was higher in Ct than in Tb, as well as for collagen maturity (Ost). Mineral content assessed as mineral/matrix (FTIRM and Raman) or as DMB, was lower in Ct than in Tb. Crystallinity (FTIRM) was similar in BSUs from Ct and Tb, and slightly lower in Ct than in Tb when measured by Raman, indicating that the crystal size/perfection was quite similar between Ct and Tb BSUs. The differences found between Ost and Int tissues were much higher than the difference found between Ct and Tb for all those bone material properties. Multiple regression analysis showed that Indentation modulus and dissipated energy were mainly explained by mineral maturity in Ct and by collagen maturity in Tb, and hardness by mineral content in both Ct and Tb. In conclusion, in untreated human iliac bone, Ct and Tb BSUs exhibit different characteristics. Ct BSUs have higher indentation modulus, dissipated energy (Int), mineral and organic maturities than Tb BSUs, without difference in hardness. Although those differences are relatively small compared to those found between Ost and Int BSUs, they may influence bone strength at macroscale.
皮质骨(Ct)和小梁骨(Tb)之间的骨纳米力学特性差异尚不确定,然而了解每个骨腔室各自的作用对于理解骨强度的起源至关重要。我们的目的是在取自同质未治疗人群的髂骨中,在骨结构单元(BSU)水平比较Ct和Tb骨腔室的骨力学和内在特性。在60例来自未治疗的绝经后骨质疏松症女性(64±7岁)的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)包埋的经髂骨活检样本中,通过在生理湿润条件下的纳米压痕法[压痕模量(弹性)、硬度、耗散能量]、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIRM)和拉曼显微光谱(矿物质和有机特性)以及X射线显微放射摄影(骨矿化程度,DMB)对2000多个BSU进行了分析。根据组织年龄、骨单位(Ost)和间质(Int)组织位置以及骨腔室(Ct和Tb)对BSU进行分类。在Ost和Int中,Ct的压痕模量均高于Tb的BSU。在Int BSU中,Ct的耗散能量高于Tb。Ct和Tb的BSU之间硬度没有差异。在Ost或Int BSU中,Ct的矿物质成熟度(非磷灰石向磷灰石磷酸盐的转化)高于Tb,胶原成熟度(Ost)也是如此。以矿物质/基质(FTIRM和拉曼)或DMB评估的矿物质含量,Ct低于Tb。通过FTIRM测量时,Ct和Tb的BSU中的结晶度相似,通过拉曼测量时,Ct略低于Tb,表明Ct和Tb的BSU之间晶体尺寸/完美程度相当相似。在所有这些骨材料特性方面,Ost和Int组织之间的差异远高于Ct和Tb之间的差异。多元回归分析表明,压痕模量和耗散能量在Ct中主要由矿物质成熟度解释,在Tb中由胶原成熟度解释,而硬度在Ct和Tb中均由矿物质含量解释。总之,在未治疗的人髂骨中,Ct和Tb的BSU表现出不同的特征。Ct的BSU比Tb的BSU具有更高的压痕模量、耗散能量(Int)、矿物质和有机成熟度,硬度无差异。尽管与Ost和Int的BSU之间的差异相比,这些差异相对较小,但它们可能在宏观尺度上影响骨强度。