• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当 POEM 真正等同于 LHM 时?学习曲线上的并发症发生率比较。

When is POEM truly equivalent to LHM? A comparison of complication rates during the learning curve.

机构信息

Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Professor Diraja Ungku Aziz Road, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1735-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09680-2. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09680-2
PMID:36214914
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is an effective treatment for Esophageal Achalasia Cardia (EAC) but the endoscopic technique required is complex. As competency is crucial for patient safety, we believe that its' competency can be demonstrated when the complication rate equals that of an established procedure such as Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy with Fundoplication (LHM + F).

METHODS

A multicentre, ambi-directional, non-randomized comparison of intra-procedural complications during the learning curve of POEM was performed against a historical cohort of LHM + F. Demographic, clinicopathological, procedural data and complications were collected. A direct head-to-head comparison was performed, followed by a population pyramid of complication frequency. Case sequence was then divided into blocks of 5, and the complication rates during each block was compared to the historical cohort.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to April 2021, 60 patients underwent LHM + F and 63 underwent POEM. Mean age was lower for the POEM group (41.7 years vs 48.1 years, p = 0.03), but there was no difference in gender nor type of Achalasia. The POEM group recorded a shorter overall procedural time (125.9 min vs 144.1 min, p = 0.023) and longer myotomies (10.1 cm vs 6.2 cm, p = 0.023). The overall complication rate of POEM was 20.6%, whereas the historical cohort of LHM + F had a rate of 10.0%. On visual inspection of the population pyramid, complications were more frequent in the earlier procedures. On block sequencing, complication frequency could be seen tapering off dramatically after the 25th case, and subsequently equalled that of LHM + F.

CONCLUSION

POEM is challenging even for experienced endoscopists. From our data, complication rates between POEM and LHM + F equalize after approximately 25 POEMs.

摘要

简介

经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是治疗食管贲门失弛缓症(EAC)的有效方法,但需要的内镜技术非常复杂。由于手术的安全性至关重要,我们认为当并发症发生率与已确立的手术(如腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术加胃底折叠术(LHM+F))相当时,就可以证明其具有胜任力。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心、双向、非随机的比较研究,即在 POEM 的学习曲线期间,将术中并发症与历史队列中的 LHM+F 进行比较。收集了人口统计学、临床病理学、手术过程数据和并发症。进行了直接的头对头比较,然后对并发症频率进行了人口金字塔分析。然后将病例序列分为 5 个块,比较每个块的并发症发生率与历史队列。

结果

从 2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月,60 例患者接受了 LHM+F 手术,63 例患者接受了 POEM 手术。POEM 组的平均年龄较低(41.7 岁比 48.1 岁,p=0.03),但性别和贲门失弛缓症类型无差异。POEM 组的总手术时间较短(125.9 分钟比 144.1 分钟,p=0.023),肌切开术较长(10.1 厘米比 6.2 厘米,p=0.023)。POEM 的总并发症发生率为 20.6%,而 LHM+F 的历史队列发生率为 10.0%。通过观察人口金字塔,在早期手术中并发症更为常见。通过块序列分析,在第 25 例之后,可以看到并发症频率显著减少,随后与 LHM+F 相等。

结论

即使对于经验丰富的内镜医生来说,POEM 也具有挑战性。根据我们的数据,POEM 和 LHM+F 之间的并发症发生率在大约 25 例 POEM 后趋于一致。

相似文献

1
When is POEM truly equivalent to LHM? A comparison of complication rates during the learning curve.当 POEM 真正等同于 LHM 时?学习曲线上的并发症发生率比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1735-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09680-2. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Comparison of early outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy to peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia.腹腔镜Heller贲门肌切开术与经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的早期疗效及生活质量比较。
Dig Endosc. 2016 Jan;28(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/den.12507. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
3
Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia.经口内镜肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症导致食管酸暴露异常的发生率高于腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2284-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6522-4. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy plus Dor fundoplication in patients with idiopathic achalasia: 5-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.经口内镜下肌切开术与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术加Dor胃底折叠术治疗特发性贲门失弛缓症:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验的5年随访
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May;10(5):431-441. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00012-3. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
5
Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for pediatric achalasia: Institutional experience and outcomes.经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)治疗小儿贲门失弛缓症:机构经验和结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Nov;57(11):728-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
6
Surgical management of esophageal achalasia: Evolution of an institutional approach to minimally invasive repair.食管贲门失弛缓症的外科治疗:一种微创修复的机构性方法的演变
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Oct;51(10):1619-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 31.
7
Reduced postoperative pain scores and narcotic use favor per-oral endoscopic myotomy over laparoscopic Heller myotomy.术后疼痛评分降低以及麻醉药物使用减少表明,经口内镜下肌切开术优于腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5034-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
[Current Treatment of Achalasia 2019].[2019年贲门失弛缓症的当前治疗方法]
Zentralbl Chir. 2019 Apr;144(2):163-170. doi: 10.1055/a-0863-4917. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗食管贲门失弛缓症:系统评价与汇总分析
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Oct;29(7):807-819. doi: 10.1111/dote.12387. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Surgery or Peroral Esophageal Myotomy for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手术或经口食管肌层切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e3001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003001.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastroesophageal reflux disease over time in endoscopic versus surgical myotomy for treatment of achalasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下与手术肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的胃食管反流病长期转归:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jun 17;13:a26215421. doi: 10.1055/a-2621-5421. eCollection 2025.
2
Evolving therapeutic approaches in achalasia: a comprehensive review of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs. Heller's myotomy.贲门失弛缓症不断发展的治疗方法:经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与海勒肌切开术的全面综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 10;87(5):2855-2867. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003271. eCollection 2025 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Issues to be Considered for Learning Curve for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术学习曲线需考虑的问题。
Clin Endosc. 2021 Sep;54(5):625-626. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.217. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
2
Acquiring new complex endoscopic skills: Experience from the development of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in Malaysia.掌握新的复杂内镜技术:马来西亚经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)发展的经验。
JGH Open. 2021 Jun 25;5(7):729-733. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12598. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Long-term clinical results of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: First report of more than 10-year patient experience as assessed with a questionnaire-based survey.
Novel device for blunt dissection in third space endoscopy: Preliminary animal study (with video).
用于第三空间内镜钝性分离的新型装置:初步动物研究(附视频)
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Feb 5;13:a25145464. doi: 10.1055/a-2514-5464. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) Versus Traditional Treatment Modalities for Achalasia: A Systematic Review.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与贲门失弛缓症传统治疗方式的比较效果:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Oct 20;16(10):e71917. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71917. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
"Into the fire" approach to teaching endoscopic foreign body removal using a modular simulation curriculum.采用模块化模拟课程以“投身火海”的方式教授内镜下异物取出术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1412-1420. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09382-9. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)治疗贲门失弛缓症的长期临床结果:基于问卷调查评估的10年以上患者经验的首次报告。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E409-E416. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1883. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
Core curriculum for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)核心课程
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar;93(3):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.026. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0.高分辨率食管动力障碍:芝加哥分类版本 4.0。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jan;33(1):e14058. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14058.
6
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and anterior Dor fundoplication for achalasia cardia in Malaysia: Clinical outcomes and satisfaction from four tertiary centers.马来西亚贲门失弛缓症的腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术和前 Dor 胃底折叠术:来自四个三级中心的临床结果和满意度。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years: a multicenter study.贲门失弛缓症患者经口内镜下肌切开术的长期疗效:一项至少随访4年的多中心研究
Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E650-E655. doi: 10.1055/a-1120-8125. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines.《2019年首尔贲门失弛缓症指南共识》
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Apr 30;26(2):180-203. doi: 10.5056/jnm20014.
9
Peroral endoscopic myotomy and fundoplication: a novel NOTES procedure.经口内镜肌切开术和抗反流手术:一种新型NOTES 手术。
Endoscopy. 2019 Feb;51(2):161-164. doi: 10.1055/a-0820-2731. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术与经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)治疗贲门失弛缓症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):451-460. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002311.