Suppr超能文献

为什么救护车工作人员(不)寻求组织帮助以获得心理健康支持?一项关于组织支持的可用性以及接受障碍/促进因素的混合方法系统评价方案。

Why do ambulance employees (not) seek organisational help for mental health support? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol of organisational support available and barriers/facilitators to uptake.

机构信息

South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 10;12(10):e062775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062775.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic is exacerbating a wide range of symptoms of poor mental health among emergency medical service (EMS) ambulance populations. Evidence suggests that using organisational support can improve employee outcomes and in turn, patient outcomes. Understanding why EMS staff do and do not use support services is therefore critical to improving uptake, ensuring equitable access, and potentially influencing workforce well-being, organisational sustainability and patient care delivery. This systematic review aims to identify what support is available and any perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing and utilising organisational support.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Searches performed between 18 February 2022 and 23 February 2022 will be used to identify studies that report barriers and facilitators to EMS employee support among all government/state commissioned EMS ambulance systems. Electronic databases, AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, Medline and PsycINFO will be searched. All relevant English-language studies of adult employees of government/state commissioned EMS ambulance organisations published since December 2004 will be screened and relevant data extracted by two independent reviewers. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements.The primary outcome is the identification of perceived barriers or facilitators to EMS staff using organisational support for mental health. The secondary outcome is the identification of supportive interventions offered through or by ambulance trusts. Study selection will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the methodological quality of included studies will be appraised by administering rating checklists. A narrative synthesis will be conducted to report qualitative and quantitative data and will include population characteristics, methodological approach and information about barriers and facilitators.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because only available published data will be analysed. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022299650.

摘要

简介

COVID-19 大流行加剧了急救医疗服务(EMS)救护车人群中广泛的心理健康不良症状。有证据表明,使用组织支持可以改善员工的结果,并进而改善患者的结果。因此,了解 EMS 工作人员为什么使用和不使用支持服务对于提高利用率、确保公平获得、并可能影响劳动力的健康、组织的可持续性和患者的护理提供至关重要。本系统评价旨在确定现有的支持措施,以及获取和利用组织支持的任何感知障碍和促进因素。

方法和分析

2022 年 2 月 18 日至 23 日进行的搜索将用于确定报告所有政府/州委托 EMS 救护车系统中 EMS 员工支持的障碍和促进因素的研究。将搜索电子数据库 AMED、CINAHL、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、EMBASE、EMCARE、HMIC、Medline 和 PsycINFO。将筛选自 2004 年 12 月以来发表的所有政府/州委托 EMS 救护车组织的成年员工的所有相关英语研究,并由两名独立审查员提取相关数据。第三名审查员将解决任何分歧。主要结果是确定 EMS 员工使用组织支持心理健康的感知障碍或促进因素。次要结果是确定通过或由救护车信托提供的支持性干预措施。研究选择将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行,并且通过实施评分检查表来评估纳入研究的方法学质量。将进行叙述性综合报告定性和定量数据,并包括人口特征、方法学方法以及关于障碍和促进因素的信息。

伦理和传播

由于仅分析可用的已发表数据,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物和会议报告进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022299650。

相似文献

5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验