Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Mar;37(3):161-169. doi: 10.1038/s41371-022-00764-z. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
Arterial hypertension is a major public health issue. Non-pharmacological approaches like Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) might be a promising addition to conventional therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effects of MBSR on systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) among individuals with prehypertension or hypertension. We searched Medline/PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception until August 1st 2021. RCTs were included that compared MBSR to any control intervention in participants with diagnosed prehypertension (120-139/80-89 mmHg) or hypertension (≥140/≥90 mmHg). Mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Seven RCTs with 429 participants were included. Very low quality of evidence was found for positive effects of MBSR on SBP (MD = -11.26 mmHg, 95%CI = -20.24 to -2.29, p = 0.01) but no evidence for effects on DBP levels (MD = -3.62 mmHg, 95%CI = -8.52 to 1.29, p = 0.15) compared to waitlist control. Compared to active control, very low quality of evidence was found for positive effects on DBP (MD = -5.51 mmHg, 95%CI = -10.93 to -0.09, p = 0.05) but no effects on SBP levels (MD = -4.33 mmHg, 95%CI = -12.04 to 3.38, p = 0.27). Overall, the studies showed a high degree of heterogeneity. The effects found were robust against selection, detection, and attrition bias. Only one RCT reported safety data. MBSR may be an option for lowering blood pressure in people with prehypertension to hypertension. More and larger high-quality studies are needed to substantiate our findings.
动脉高血压是一个主要的公共卫生问题。非药物治疗方法,如正念减压(MBSR),可能是传统治疗的一个有前途的补充。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估 MBSR 对高血压前期或高血压患者的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的影响。我们检索了 Medline/PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL),以获取从成立到 2021 年 8 月 1 日的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们纳入了将 MBSR 与高血压前期(120-139/80-89mmHg)或高血压(≥140/≥90mmHg)患者的任何对照干预进行比较的 RCT。计算了平均差异(MD)和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 Cochrane 工具评估偏倚风险。纳入了 7 项 RCT,共 429 名参与者。发现 MBSR 对 SBP 的积极影响具有极低质量的证据(MD=-11.26mmHg,95%CI=-20.24 至-2.29,p=0.01),但对 DBP 水平无影响(MD=-3.62mmHg,95%CI=-8.52 至 1.29,p=0.15),与等待名单对照相比。与活性对照相比,发现 MBSR 对 DBP 的积极影响具有极低质量的证据(MD=-5.51mmHg,95%CI=-10.93 至-0.09,p=0.05),但对 SBP 水平无影响(MD=-4.33mmHg,95%CI=-12.04 至 3.38,p=0.27)。总体而言,这些研究显示出高度的异质性。发现的效果对选择、检测和失访偏倚具有稳健性。只有一项 RCT 报告了安全性数据。MBSR 可能是降低高血压前期至高血压患者血压的一种选择。需要更多和更大的高质量研究来证实我们的发现。