MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, Glasgow, UK, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):e064304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064304.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) may use surrogate endpoints as substitutes and predictors of patient-relevant/participant-relevant final outcomes (eg, survival, health-related quality of life). Translation of effects measured on a surrogate endpoint into health benefits for patients/participants is dependent on the validity of the surrogate; hence, more accurate and transparent reporting on surrogate endpoints is needed to limit misleading interpretation of trial findings. However, there is currently no explicit guidance for the reporting of such trials. Therefore, we aim to develop extensions to the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) reporting guidelines to improve the design and completeness of reporting of RCTs and their protocols using a surrogate endpoint as a primary outcome.
The project will have four phases: phase 1 (literature reviews) to identify candidate reporting items to be rated in a Delphi study; phase 2 (Delphi study) to rate the importance of items identified in phase 1 and receive suggestions for additional items; phase 3 (consensus meeting) to agree on final set of items for inclusion in the extensions and phase 4 (knowledge translation) to engage stakeholders and disseminate the project outputs through various strategies including peer-reviewed publications. Patient and public involvement will be embedded into all project phases.
The study has received ethical approval from the University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (project no: 200210051). The findings will be published in open-access peer-reviewed publications and presented in conferences, meetings and relevant forums.
随机对照试验(RCT)可以使用替代终点作为替代指标,并预测与患者/参与者相关的最终结局(例如,生存、健康相关生活质量)。将替代终点上测量的效应转化为患者/参与者的健康获益,取决于替代终点的有效性;因此,需要更准确和透明地报告替代终点,以限制对试验结果的误导性解释。然而,目前没有关于此类试验报告的明确指导。因此,我们旨在对 SPIRIT(标准干预试验报告条目:推荐)和 CONSORT(临床试验报告统一标准)报告指南进行扩展,以改善使用替代终点作为主要结局的 RCT 及其方案的设计和报告完整性。
该项目将分为四个阶段:第 1 阶段(文献综述),以确定在 Delphi 研究中要评价的候选报告条目;第 2 阶段(Delphi 研究),对第 1 阶段确定的条目进行重要性评价,并收到额外条目的建议;第 3 阶段(共识会议),就纳入扩展的最终条目达成一致;第 4 阶段(知识转化),通过多种策略(包括同行评审出版物)与利益相关者接触并传播项目成果。患者和公众参与将嵌入到所有项目阶段。
该研究已获得格拉斯哥大学医学、兽医和生命科学伦理委员会的伦理批准(项目编号:200210051)。研究结果将发表在开放获取的同行评议出版物中,并在会议、会议和相关论坛上展示。