Al Nemari Manal, Waterson James
Pharmacy Informatics and Automation, King Fahad Medical City, General Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Medication Management Solutions, Medical Affairs, Becton Dickinson, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 11;9(4):e37905. doi: 10.2196/37905.
Outpatient pharmacy management aims for improved patient safety, improved quality of service, and cost reduction. The Six Sigma method improves quality by eliminating variability, with the goal of a nearly error-free process. Automation of pharmacy tasks potentially offers greater efficiency and safety.
The goal was to measure the impact that integration of automation made to service, safety and efficiency, staff reallocation and reorientation, and workflow in the outpatient pharmacy department. The Six Sigma problem definition to be resolved was as follows: The current system of outpatient dispensing denies quality to patients in terms of waiting time and contact time with pharmacy professionals, incorporates risks to the patient in terms of mislabeling of medications and the incomplete dispensing of prescriptions, and is potentially wasteful in terms of time and resources.
We described the process of introducing automation to a large outpatient pharmacy department in a university hospital. The Six Sigma approach was used as it focuses on continuous improvement and also produces a road map that integrates tracking and monitoring into its process. A review of activity in the outpatient department focused on non-value-added (NVA) pharmacist tasks, improving the patient experience and patient safety. Metrics to measure the impact of change were established, and a process map analysis with turnaround times (TATs) for each stage of service was created. Discrete events were selected for correction, improvement, or mitigation. From the review, the team selected key outcome metrics, including storage, picking and delivery dispensing rates, patient and prescription load per day, average packs and lines per prescription, and lines held. Our goal was total automation of stock management. We deployed 2 robotic dispensing units to feed 9 dispensing desks. The automated units were integrated with hospital information technology (HIT) that supports appointments, medication records, and prescriptions.
Postautomation, the total patient time in the department, including the time interacting with the pharmacist for medication education and counseling, dropped from 17.093 to 11.812 digital minutes, with an appreciable increase in patient-pharmacist time. The percentage of incomplete prescriptions dispensed versus orders decreased from 3.0% to 1.83%. The dispensing error rate dropped from 1.00% to 0.24%. Assessed via a "basket" of medications, wastage cost was reduced by 83.9%. During implementation, it was found that NVA tasks that were replaced by automated processes were responsible for an extensive loss of pharmacist time. The productivity ratio postautomation was 1.26.
The Six Sigma methodology allowed for rapid transformation of the medication management process. The risk priority numbers (RPNs) for the "wrong patient-wrong medication error" reduced by a ratio of 5.25:1 and for "patient leaves unit with inadequate counseling" postautomation by 2.5:1. Automation allowed for ring-fencing of patient-pharmacist time. This time needs to be structured for optimal effectiveness.
门诊药房管理旨在提高患者安全性、提升服务质量并降低成本。六西格玛方法通过消除变异性来提高质量,目标是实现几乎无差错的流程。药房任务自动化有可能提高效率和安全性。
本研究旨在衡量自动化集成对门诊药房部门的服务、安全与效率、人员重新分配与重新定位以及工作流程的影响。有待解决的六西格玛问题定义如下:当前门诊配药系统在患者等待时间以及与药房专业人员的接触时间方面无法为患者提供优质服务,在药品贴错标签和处方配药不完整方面给患者带来风险,并且在时间和资源方面可能存在浪费。
我们描述了在一家大学医院的大型门诊药房引入自动化的过程。采用六西格玛方法,因为它注重持续改进,并且还生成了一个将跟踪和监测集成到其流程中的路线图。对门诊部门的活动进行审查,重点关注非增值(NVA)药剂师任务,以改善患者体验和患者安全。建立了衡量变革影响的指标,并创建了每个服务阶段的周转时间(TAT)流程图分析。选择离散事件进行纠正、改进或缓解。通过审查,团队选择了关键结果指标,包括存储、拣选和交付配药率、每天的患者和处方量、每张处方的平均包装数和行数以及排队数。我们的目标是实现库存管理的完全自动化。我们部署了2个机器人配药单元为9个配药台供药。这些自动化单元与支持预约、用药记录和处方的医院信息技术(HIT)集成。
自动化实施后,患者在药房的总时间,包括与药剂师进行用药教育和咨询的时间,从17.093数字分钟降至11.812数字分钟,患者与药剂师的互动时间显著增加。已配药的不完整处方与订单的百分比从3.0%降至1.83%。配药错误率从1.00%降至0.24%。通过“一组”药物评估,浪费成本降低了83.9%。在实施过程中发现,被自动化流程取代的非增值任务导致药剂师时间大量流失。自动化后的生产率比率为1.26。
六西格玛方法实现了用药管理流程的快速转变。“患者错误 - 药物错误”的风险优先数(RPN)降低了5.25:1,“患者在咨询不足的情况下离开药房”在自动化后的RPN降低了2.5:1。自动化实现了患者与药剂师互动时间的有效利用。这段时间需要进行合理安排以实现最佳效果。