• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水洞沟遗址 2 地点末次间冰期晚期以石片为基础的技术

After the blades: The late MIS3 flake-based technology at Shuidonggou Locality 2, North China.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.

Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 12;17(10):e0274777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274777. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0274777
PMID:36223341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9555678/
Abstract

Contrasting with the predominance of blade-based assemblages in the Eurasian Upper Paleolithic, the large-scale persistence of a core-and-flake technology remains one of the defining features of Late Pleistocene lithic technology in East Asia. In North China, Shuidonggou is an exceptional site where both technologies are documented, therefore, it is an important archaeological sequence to understand regional technological evolution during the Marine Isotopic Stage 3. Blade technology first occurred at Shuidonggou Locality 1 and 2 around 41 ka cal BP while core-and-flake assemblages were widespread in North China. However, systematic technological studies on assemblages postdating 34 ka cal BP have not been conducted to examine whether the blade technology appeared and disappeared over a short yet abrupt episode, or persists and integrates into other forms in the region. Here, we conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses to reconstruct lithic productions on the assemblages at Shuidonggou Locality 2, dated after 34 ka cal BP. Our results show that there is a total absence of laminar elements in stone artifacts dated to 34-28 ka cal BP at Shuidonggou. Instead, we observe a dominance of an expedient production of flakes in the younger assemblages, illustrating a rapid return to flake-based technology after a relatively brief episode of stone blade production. Combining archaeological, environmental, and genetic evidence, we suggest that this technological 'reversal' from blades back to core and flake technology reflect population dynamics and adaptive strategies at an ecological interface between East Asian winter and summer monsoon.

摘要

与欧亚大陆旧石器时代晚期以叶片工具为主的组合形成鲜明对比的是,核心-片石器技术的大规模持续存在是东亚更新世晚期石器技术的主要特征之一。在中国北方,水洞沟是一个特殊的遗址,记录了这两种技术,因此,它是了解海洋同位素阶段 3 期间区域技术演变的重要考古序列。叶片技术最早出现在水洞沟 1 号和 2 号地点,大约在 41 千年前,而核心-片石器组合在华北地区广泛存在。然而,对于发生在 34 千年前之后的组合,并没有进行系统的技术研究,以检验叶片技术是否在一个短暂而突然的时期内出现和消失,还是在该地区持续存在并融入其他形式。在这里,我们对水洞沟 2 号地点发生在 34 千年前之后的组合进行了定性和定量分析,以重建石器制作过程。我们的结果表明,在水洞沟 34-28 千年前的石器中完全没有层理元素。相反,我们观察到在较年轻的组合中,片状石器的制作占据主导地位,这表明在相对短暂的叶片石器生产期之后,片状技术迅速回归。结合考古学、环境和遗传学证据,我们认为这种从叶片到核心和片状技术的技术“反转”反映了东亚冬季和夏季季风生态界面的人口动态和适应策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/aba6ddc62fd8/pone.0274777.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/03cb4f387eff/pone.0274777.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/22f0a4c95bdc/pone.0274777.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/8a361be42532/pone.0274777.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/726e444b9806/pone.0274777.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/5c3803694399/pone.0274777.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/2ddb4b506d4c/pone.0274777.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/b482a7051ddd/pone.0274777.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/80a4881bbac2/pone.0274777.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/3b82cada190d/pone.0274777.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/92c320804bf7/pone.0274777.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/aba6ddc62fd8/pone.0274777.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/03cb4f387eff/pone.0274777.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/22f0a4c95bdc/pone.0274777.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/8a361be42532/pone.0274777.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/726e444b9806/pone.0274777.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/5c3803694399/pone.0274777.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/2ddb4b506d4c/pone.0274777.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/b482a7051ddd/pone.0274777.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/80a4881bbac2/pone.0274777.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/3b82cada190d/pone.0274777.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/92c320804bf7/pone.0274777.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d45/9555678/aba6ddc62fd8/pone.0274777.g011.jpg

相似文献

1
After the blades: The late MIS3 flake-based technology at Shuidonggou Locality 2, North China.水洞沟遗址 2 地点末次间冰期晚期以石片为基础的技术
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 12;17(10):e0274777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274777. eCollection 2022.
2
Re-examination of the dates of large blade technology in China: a comparison of Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Locality 2.重新审视中国大型刃具技术的年代: ShuiDongGou 1 地点与 2 地点的对比。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Feb;64(2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
3
Intra-assemblage variation in the macro-blade assemblage from the 1963 excavation at Shuidonggou locality 1, northern China, in the context of regional variation.中国北方水洞沟地点 1 号发掘 1963 年出土的大型叶片组合内的组合内变化,以及区域变化的背景。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 15;15(6):e0234576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234576. eCollection 2020.
4
A chronological model for the Late Paleolithic at Shuidonggou Locality 2, North China.华北水洞沟地点 2 的晚更新世年代序列模型。
PLoS One. 2020 May 27;15(5):e0232682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232682. eCollection 2020.
5
The Initial Upper Paleolithic of the Altai: New radiocarbon determinations for the Kara-Bom site.阿尔泰山地区的旧石器时代早期上部:卡拉邦遗址的新放射性碳定年测定。
J Hum Evol. 2023 Dec;185:103453. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103453. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
6
Re-thinking the evolution of microblade technology in East Asia: Techno-functional understanding of the lithic assemblage from Shizitan 29 (Shanxi, China).重新思考东亚微刃技术的演变:来自山西柿子滩 29 号遗址石器组合的工艺-功能理解。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 25;14(2):e0212643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212643. eCollection 2019.
7
Late Middle Pleistocene Levallois stone-tool technology in southwest China.中国西南地区中更新世晚期的勒瓦娄哇技术。
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7737):82-85. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0710-1. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
8
Curated character of the Initial Upper Palaeolithic lithic artefact assemblages in Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria).巴乔基罗洞穴(保加利亚)旧石器时代初期石器组合的精选特征。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 4;19(9):e0307435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307435. eCollection 2024.
9
Luminescence chronology for the Paleolithic site of Xinmiaozhuang Locality 1 (XMZ1) in the Nihewan Basin, northern China, and its paleoenvironmental and archaeological implications.中国北方泥河湾盆地新庙庄遗址 1 号地点(XMZ1)的旧石器时代光释光测年及其古环境和考古学意义。
J Hum Evol. 2021 Aug;157:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103033. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
10
Ages for hominin occupation in Lushi Basin, middle of South Luo River, central China.中国中部南洛河流域芦氏盆地古人类的活动年代。
J Hum Evol. 2011 May;60(5):612-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Curated character of the Initial Upper Palaeolithic lithic artefact assemblages in Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria).巴乔基罗洞穴(保加利亚)旧石器时代初期石器组合的精选特征。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 4;19(9):e0307435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307435. eCollection 2024.
2
Initial Upper Palaeolithic material culture by 45,000 years ago at Shiyu in northern China.中国北方峙峪距今45000年前的旧石器时代晚期初始物质文化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar;8(3):552-563. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02294-4. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The deep population history of northern East Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene.从晚更新世到全新世东亚北部的深层人口历史。
Cell. 2021 Jun 10;184(12):3256-3266.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.040. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
Initial Upper Palaeolithic humans in Europe had recent Neanderthal ancestry.欧洲的早期旧石器时代人类具有最近的尼安德特人血统。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7853):253-257. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03335-3. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
Intra-assemblage variation in the macro-blade assemblage from the 1963 excavation at Shuidonggou locality 1, northern China, in the context of regional variation.
中国北方水洞沟地点 1 号发掘 1963 年出土的大型叶片组合内的组合内变化,以及区域变化的背景。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 15;15(6):e0234576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234576. eCollection 2020.
4
A chronological model for the Late Paleolithic at Shuidonggou Locality 2, North China.华北水洞沟地点 2 的晚更新世年代序列模型。
PLoS One. 2020 May 27;15(5):e0232682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232682. eCollection 2020.
5
Initial Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria.保加利亚巴乔基罗洞穴的早期旧石器时代智人。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7808):299-302. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2259-z. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
The Northern Route for Human dispersal in Central and Northeast Asia: New evidence from the site of Tolbor-16, Mongolia.中亚和东北亚人类迁徙的北路:来自蒙古托尔博尔-16 遗址的新证据。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):11759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47972-1.
7
The population history of northeastern Siberia since the Pleistocene.东北西伯利亚自更新世以来的人口历史。
Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7760):182-188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1279-z. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
Compound-specific radiocarbon dating and mitochondrial DNA analysis of the Pleistocene hominin from Salkhit Mongolia.对蒙古萨拉赫特更新世古人类进行的特殊放射性碳年代测定和线粒体 DNA 分析。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 30;10(1):274. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08018-8.
9
Re-dating Zhoukoudian Upper Cave, northern China and its regional significance.重新测定中国北方周口店山顶洞及其区域意义。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Aug;121:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 May 31.
10
40,000-Year-Old Individual from Asia Provides Insight into Early Population Structure in Eurasia.亚洲 4 万年前个体为欧亚早期人群结构提供新见解。
Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23;27(20):3202-3208.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.030. Epub 2017 Oct 12.