Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
NHC Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation (Sun Yat-sen University), Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
BMC Med. 2022 Oct 13;20(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02545-4.
Current guidelines recommend rhythm control for improving symptoms and quality of life in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the long-term prognostic outcomes of rhythm control compared with rate control are still inconclusive. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of early rhythm control compared with rate control on clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed AF patients.
We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases up to August 2022 for randomized and observational studies reporting the associations of early rhythm control (defined as within 12 months of AF diagnosis) with effectiveness outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, admission to hospital for heart failure (HF), or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were pooled using a random-effects model, complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model.
A total of 8 studies involving 447,202 AF patients were included, and 23.5% of participants underwent an early rhythm-control therapy. In the pooled analysis using the random-effects model, compared with rate control, the early rhythm-control strategy was significantly associated with reductions in the primary composite outcome (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86-0.89) and secondary outcomes, including stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.85), ischemic stroke (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.94), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99), HF hospitalization (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.92), and ACS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). Reanalyses using the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model yielded similar results.
Our current meta-analysis suggested that early initiation of rhythm control treatment was associated with improved adverse effectiveness outcomes in patients who had been diagnosed with AF within 1 year.
The study protocol was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42021295405).
目前的指南建议节律控制可改善有症状的心房颤动(AF)患者的症状和生活质量。然而,节律控制与心率控制相比的长期预后结果仍不确定。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估与心率控制相比,早期节律控制对新诊断的 AF 患者临床结局的影响。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库,截至 2022 年 8 月,以获取报告早期节律控制(定义为 AF 诊断后 12 个月内)与有效性结局关联的随机和观察性研究。主要结局是死亡、卒、因心力衰竭(HF)住院或急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的复合结局。使用随机效应模型对每项研究的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总,并补充使用方差异质性或质量效应模型。
共纳入 8 项研究,涉及 447202 名 AF 患者,其中 23.5%的参与者接受了早期节律控制治疗。在使用随机效应模型的汇总分析中,与心率控制相比,早期节律控制策略与主要复合结局(HR=0.88,95%CI:0.86-0.89)和次要结局的降低显著相关,包括卒或全身性栓塞(HR=0.78,95%CI:0.71-0.85)、缺血性卒(HR=0.81,95%CI:0.69-0.94)、心血管死亡(HR=0.83,95%CI:0.70-0.99)、HF 住院(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.88-0.92)和 ACS(HR=0.86,95%CI:0.76-0.98)。使用方差异质性或质量效应模型进行的重新分析得出了类似的结果。
我们目前的荟萃分析表明,在 1 年内诊断为 AF 的患者中,早期启动节律控制治疗与改善不良有效性结局相关。
研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42021295405)注册。