Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Heart. 2022 Nov 10;108(23):1873-1880. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321196.
The Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention (EAST-AFNET4) trial showed a clinical benefit of early rhythm-control therapy in patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). The generalisability of the results in the general population is not known.
Participants in the population-based UK Biobank were assessed for eligibility based on the EAST-AFNET4 inclusion/exclusion criteria. Treatment of all eligible participants was classified as early rhythm-control (antiarrhythmic drug therapy or AF ablation) or usual care. To assess treatment effects, primary care data and Hospital Episode Statistics were merged with UK Biobank data.Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared between groups in the entire cohort and in a propensity-matched data set.
AF was present in 35 526/502 493 (7.1%) participants, including 8340 (988 with AF <1 year) with AF at enrolment and 27 186 with incident AF during follow-up. Most participants (22 003/27 186; 80.9%) with incident AF were eligible for early rhythm-control.Eligible participants were older (70 years vs 63 years) and more likely to be female (42% vs 21%) compared with ineligible patients. Of 9004 participants with full primary care data, 874 (9.02%) received early rhythm-control. Safety outcomes were not different between patients receiving early rhythm-control and controls. The primary outcome of EAST-AFNET 4, a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke/transient ischaemic attack and hospitalisation for heart failure or acute coronary syndrome occurred less often in participants receiving early rhythm-control compared with controls in the entire cohort (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.94, p=0.005). In the propensity-score matched analysis, early rhythm-control did not significantly decrease of the primary outcome compared with usual care (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.04, p=0.124).
Around 80% of participants diagnosed with AF in the UK population are eligible for early rhythm-control. Early rhythm-control therapy was safe in routine care.
早期房颤抗凝预防(EAST-AFNET4)试验表明,近期诊断为房颤(AF)的患者接受早期节律控制治疗具有临床获益。目前尚不清楚这些结果在普通人群中的普遍性。
根据 EAST-AFNET4 的纳入/排除标准,对基于人群的英国生物银行的参与者进行了资格评估。所有符合条件的参与者的治疗均分为早期节律控制(抗心律失常药物治疗或 AF 消融)或常规护理。为了评估治疗效果,将初级保健数据和医院发病统计数据与英国生物银行数据合并。在整个队列和倾向匹配数据集比较了两组之间的疗效和安全性结局。
502493 名参与者中有 35526 名(7.1%)存在 AF,其中 8340 名(988 名 AF<1 年)在入组时存在 AF,27186 名在随访期间发生 AF。大多数(22003/27186;80.9%)发生的 AF 患者符合早期节律控制的条件。与不符合条件的患者相比,符合条件的患者年龄更大(70 岁 vs 63 岁),且更可能为女性(42% vs 21%)。在 9004 名具有完整初级保健数据的参与者中,874 名(9.02%)接受了早期节律控制。接受早期节律控制的患者和对照组的安全性结局无差异。在整个队列中,与对照组相比,接受早期节律控制的患者发生 EAST-AFNET4 主要结局(心血管死亡、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作以及因心力衰竭或急性冠状动脉综合征住院的复合结局)的频率较低(HR 0.82,95%CI 0.71 至 0.94,p=0.005)。在倾向评分匹配分析中,与常规护理相比,早期节律控制并未显著降低主要结局(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.72 至 1.04,p=0.124)。
在英国人群中,约 80%的 AF 诊断患者符合早期节律控制的条件。在常规护理中,早期节律控制治疗是安全的。