NPMS-HHC CIC, 21 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3HH, UK.
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(12):1235-1246. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01193-z. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
We aimed to calculate the efficiency of the EmERGE Pathway of Care in five European HIV clinics, developed and implemented for medically stable people living with HIV.
Participants were followed up for 1 year before and after implementation of EmERGE, between April 2016 and October 2019. Micro-costing studies were performed in the outpatient services of the clinics. Unit costs for outpatient services were calculated in national currencies and converted to US$ 2018 OECD purchasing parity prices to enable between clinic comparisons in terms of outcomes and costs. Unit costs were linked to the mean use of services for medically stable people living with HIV, before and after implementation of EmERGE. Primary outcome measures were CD4 count and viral load; secondary outcomes were patient activation (PAM13) and quality of life (PROQOL-HIV). Out-of-pocket expenditure data were collected.
There were 2251 participants: 87-93% were male, mean age at entry was 41-47 years. Medically stable people living with HIV had outpatient visits in four sites which decreased by 9-31% and costs by 5-33%; visits and costs increased by 8% in one site, which had to revert back to face-to-face visits. Antiretroviral drugs comprised 83-91% of annual costs: the Portuguese site had the highest antiretroviral drug costs in US$ purchasing parity prices. Primary and secondary outcome measures of participants did not change during the study.
EmERGE is acceptable and provided cost savings in different socio-economic settings. Antiretroviral drug costs remain the main cost drivers in medically stable people living with HIV. While antiretroviral drug prices in local currencies did not differ that much between countries, conversion to US$ purchasing parity prices revealed antiretroviral drugs were more expensive in the least wealthy countries. This needs to be taken into consideration when countries negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical vendors. Greater efficiencies can be anticipated by extending the use of the EmERGE Pathway to people with complex HIV infection or other chronic diseases. Extending such use should be systematically monitored, implementation should be evaluated and funding should be provided to monitor and evaluate future changes in service provision.
我们旨在计算在五个欧洲艾滋病毒诊所实施的、针对医学稳定的艾滋病毒感染者的 EmERGE 护理途径的效率。
参与者在 2016 年 4 月至 2019 年 10 月期间,在实施 EmERGE 前后进行了为期 1 年的随访。在诊所的门诊服务中进行了微观成本研究。门诊服务的单位成本按本国货币计算,并转换为 2018 年经合组织购买力平价的美元,以便在结果和成本方面对诊所之间进行比较。单位成本与实施 EmERGE 前后医学稳定的艾滋病毒感染者的平均服务使用情况相关联。主要观察指标为 CD4 计数和病毒载量;次要观察指标为患者激活(PAM13)和生活质量(PROQOL-HIV)。收集自付支出数据。
共有 2251 名参与者:87-93%为男性,入组时的平均年龄为 41-47 岁。医学稳定的艾滋病毒感染者在四个地点进行门诊就诊,就诊次数减少了 9-31%,费用减少了 5-33%;一个地点的就诊次数和费用增加了 8%,不得不恢复面对面就诊。抗逆转录病毒药物占年度费用的 83-91%:葡萄牙地点的抗逆转录病毒药物费用按购买力平价计算最高。研究期间,参与者的主要和次要结果没有变化。
EmERGE 是可以接受的,并在不同的社会经济环境中节省了成本。抗逆转录病毒药物仍然是医学稳定的艾滋病毒感染者的主要成本驱动因素。虽然各国的抗逆转录病毒药物当地货币价格差异不大,但转换为经合组织购买力平价的美元价格显示,抗逆转录病毒药物在最不富裕的国家更昂贵。在与制药商谈判药物价格时,这需要考虑在内。通过将 EmERGE 途径扩展到具有复杂艾滋病毒感染或其他慢性疾病的人群,预计会有更大的效率。应系统监测这种用途的扩展,评估实施情况,并提供资金,以监测和评估未来服务提供的变化。