证据权重法评估二氧化钛(TiO)的遗传毒性。
A weight of evidence review of the genotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO).
机构信息
Kirkland Consulting, PO Box 79, Tadcaster LS24 0AS, UK.
Marilyn Aardema Consulting LLC, 5315 Oakbrook Dr, Fairfield, OH, 45014, USA.
出版信息
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Dec;136:105263. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105263. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
Titanium dioxide is a ubiquitous white material found in a diverse range of products from foods to sunscreens, as a pigment and thickener, amongst other uses. Titanium dioxide has been considered no longer safe for use in foods (nano and microparticles of E171) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) due to concerns over genotoxicity. There are however, conflicting opinions regarding the safety of Titanium dioxide. In an attempt to clarify the situation, a comprehensive weight of evidence (WoE) assessment of the genotoxicity of titanium dioxide based on the available data was performed. A total of 192 datasets for endpoints and test systems considered the most relevant for identifying mutagenic and carcinogenic potential were reviewed and discussed for both reliability and relevance (by weight of evidence) and in the context of whether the physico-chemical properties of the particles had been characterised. The view of an independent panel of experts was that, of the 192 datasets identified, only 34 met the reliability and quality criteria for being most relevant in the evaluation of genotoxicity. Of these, 10 were positive (i.e. reported evidence that titanium dioxide was genotoxic), all of which were from studies of DNA strand breakage (comet assay) or chromosome damage (micronucleus or chromosome aberration assays). All the positive findings were associated with high cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, necrosis, or combinations of these. Considering that DNA and chromosome breakage can be secondary to physiological stress, it is highly likely that the observed genotoxic effects of titanium dioxide, including those with nanoparticles, are secondary to physiological stress. Consistent with this finding, there were no positive results from the in vitro and in vivo gene mutation studies evaluated, although it should be noted that to definitively conclude a lack of mutagenicity, more robust in vitro and in vivo gene mutation studies would be useful. Existing evidence does not therefore support a direct DNA damaging mechanism for titanium dioxide (nano and other forms).
二氧化钛是一种无处不在的白色物质,存在于从食品到防晒霜等各种产品中,可用作颜料和增稠剂等。由于对遗传毒性的担忧,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)认为二氧化钛(E171 的纳米和微粒子)不再适用于食品。然而,对于二氧化钛的安全性存在不同意见。为了澄清这种情况,根据现有数据,对二氧化钛的遗传毒性进行了全面的证据评估。对最相关的终点和测试系统的 192 个数据集进行了审查和讨论,这些数据集考虑了识别致突变和致癌潜力的最相关因素,评估了其可靠性和相关性(根据证据权重),并考虑了颗粒的物理化学特性是否得到了描述。一个独立专家小组的观点是,在所确定的 192 个数据集中,只有 34 个数据集符合可靠性和质量标准,是评价遗传毒性的最相关数据。其中 10 个为阳性(即报告二氧化钛具有遗传毒性的证据),均来自 DNA 链断裂(彗星试验)或染色体损伤(微核或染色体畸变试验)的研究。所有阳性发现均与高细胞毒性、氧化应激、炎症、细胞凋亡、细胞坏死或这些因素的组合有关。考虑到 DNA 和染色体断裂可能是生理应激的结果,因此,观察到的二氧化钛(包括纳米颗粒)的遗传毒性效应很可能是生理应激的结果。与这一发现一致的是,评估的体外和体内基因突变研究没有阳性结果,尽管应该注意的是,为了明确得出无致突变性的结论,更有力的体外和体内基因突变研究将是有用的。因此,现有证据不支持二氧化钛(纳米和其他形式)具有直接的 DNA 损伤机制。