Suppr超能文献

二氧化钛(E171)作为人类食品添加剂的安全性。

Safety of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive for humans.

作者信息

Warheit David B

机构信息

Warheit Scientific LLC, Wilmington, DE, United States.

出版信息

Front Toxicol. 2024 Jul 19;6:1333746. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1333746. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO), also known as E171, is commonly used as a white colorant in food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and toothpaste. However, in May 2021, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) expert panel, in evaluating the safety of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive, concluded that a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out. This occurred several years after EFSA had previously considered titanium dioxide to be safe as a food additive. EFSA based this new interpretation on the results of genotoxicity tests of TiO nanomaterials. EFSA noted that available data are insufficient to define threshold doses/concentrations of TiO particles below which genotoxicity will not occur in tissues containing these particles. Here, it is argued that EFSA made a manifest error regarding the safety of titanium dioxide (E171) particles as a food additive for humans. First, the notion of particle size distribution of TiO particles is explained. Second, the changing opinions from the various EFSA evaluations in 2016, 2018, 2019 vs. 2021 are discussed. Third, the low toxicity of TiO particles is described in rats exposed by oral gavage and feeding studies in rats and mice. Fourth, the importance of low absorption rates from the gastrointestinal tract vs. circulation in rats and humans but not in mice is identified. Fifth, other international health scientists have weighed in on the EFSA (EFSA J, 2021, 19 (5), 6585) decision and generally disagreed with EFSA's opinion on the safety of E171 TiO. A common theme voiced by the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand agencies is that it is inappropriate to compare nanoparticle toxicity studies of dispersed/sonicated nanoparticles with the content of E171 TiO in foods because the test materials used in key studies considered by EFSA (EFSA J, 2021, 19 (5), 6585) are not representative of E171 TiO particles. Finally, a group of experts recently considered the genotoxicity of TiO and could not find support for a direct DNA damaging mechanism of TiO (nano and other forms). For these reasons, it is suggested that EFSA made a manifest error on the safety of E171 as a food additive.

摘要

二氧化钛(TiO),也被称为E171,常用于食品、药品、化妆品和牙膏中作为白色着色剂。然而,2021年5月,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)专家小组在评估二氧化钛(E171)作为食品添加剂的安全性时得出结论,不能排除对其遗传毒性的担忧。这一情况发生在EFSA此前认为二氧化钛作为食品添加剂是安全的数年之后。EFSA这一新的解读基于TiO纳米材料遗传毒性测试的结果。EFSA指出,现有数据不足以确定TiO颗粒的阈值剂量/浓度,低于该阈值,含有这些颗粒的组织中不会发生遗传毒性。在此,有人认为EFSA在二氧化钛(E171)颗粒作为人类食品添加剂的安全性问题上犯了明显错误。首先,解释了TiO颗粒的粒径分布概念。其次,讨论了EFSA在2016年、2018年、2019年与2021年的各项评估中不断变化的观点。第三,描述了经口灌胃暴露于TiO颗粒的大鼠以及大鼠和小鼠喂养研究中TiO颗粒的低毒性。第四,确定了大鼠和人类胃肠道吸收率低相对于循环吸收率低的重要性,而小鼠则不然。第五,其他国际健康科学家对EFSA(EFSA J,2021,19(5),6585)的决定发表了意见,普遍不同意EFSA对E171 TiO安全性的看法。英国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰机构表达的一个共同观点是,将分散/超声处理的纳米颗粒的纳米颗粒毒性研究与食品中E171 TiO的含量进行比较是不合适的,因为EFSA(EFSA J,2021,19(5),6585)考虑的关键研究中使用的测试材料不能代表E171 TiO颗粒。最后,一组专家最近考虑了TiO的遗传毒性,未发现支持TiO(纳米及其他形式)直接DNA损伤机制的证据。出于这些原因,有人认为EFSA在E171作为食品添加剂的安全性问题上犯了明显错误。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6500/11295244/43dfcabbb270/ftox-06-1333746-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验