Department of Internal medicine, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 13;12(10):e063793. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063793.
To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of hand-held ultrasound (HUD) examinations with real-time automatic decision-making software for ejection fraction (autoEF) and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (autoMAPSE) by novices (general practitioners), intermediate users (registered cardiac nurses) and expert users (cardiologists), respectively, compared to reference echocardiography by cardiologists in an outpatient cohort with suspected heart failure (HF).
Feasibility study of a diagnostic test.
166 patients with suspected HF underwent HUD examinations with autoEF and autoMAPSE measurements by five novices, three intermediate-skilled users and five experts. HUD results were compared with a reference echocardiography by experts. A blinded cardiologist scored all HUD recordings with automatic measurements as (1) discard, (2) accept, but adjust the measurement or (3) accept the measurement as it is.
The feasibility of automatic decision-making software for quantification of left ventricular function.
The users were able to run autoEF and autoMAPSE in most patients. The feasibility for obtaining accepted images (score of ≥2) with automatic measurements ranged from 50% to 91%. The feasibility was lowest for novices and highest for experts for both autoEF and autoMAPSE (p≤0.001). Large coefficients of variation and wide coefficients of repeatability indicate moderate agreement. The corresponding intraclass correlations (ICC) were moderate to good (ICC 0.51-0.85) for intra-rater and poor (ICC 0.35-0.51) for inter-rater analyses. The findings of modest to poor agreement and reliability were not explained by the experience of the users alone.
Novices, intermediate and expert users were able to record four-chamber views for automatic assessment of autoEF and autoMAPSE using HUD devices. The modest feasibility, agreement and reliability suggest this should not be implemented into clinical practice without further refinement and clinical evaluation.
NCT03547076.
评估新手(全科医生)、中级用户(注册心脏护士)和专家用户(心脏病专家)分别使用手持式超声(HUD)检查和实时自动决策软件进行射血分数(autoEF)和二尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(autoMAPSE)的可行性和可靠性,并与疑似心力衰竭(HF)门诊患者的心脏病专家参考超声心动图进行比较。
诊断测试的可行性研究。
166 名疑似 HF 的患者接受了五位新手、三位中级用户和五位专家进行的 HUD 检查和 autoEF 和 autoMAPSE 测量。HUD 结果与专家的参考超声心动图进行了比较。一位盲法心脏病专家对所有使用自动测量的 HUD 记录进行评分,分为 (1) 丢弃、(2) 接受,但调整测量值或 (3) 接受测量值。
自动决策软件定量左心室功能的可行性。
用户能够在大多数患者中运行 autoEF 和 autoMAPSE。使用自动测量获得可接受图像(评分≥2)的可行性范围为 50%至 91%。对于 autoEF 和 autoMAPSE,新手的可行性最低,而专家的可行性最高(p≤0.001)。较大的变异系数和较宽的可重复性系数表明中度一致性。相应的组内相关系数(ICC)为中等至良好(ICC 0.51-0.85),用于内部评分者,而较差(ICC 0.35-0.51)用于外部评分者分析。适度至较差的一致性和可靠性发现不能仅用用户的经验来解释。
新手、中级和专家用户能够使用 HUD 设备记录四腔心视图,用于自动评估 autoEF 和 autoMAPSE。适度的可行性、一致性和可靠性表明,如果不进一步改进和临床评估,不应将其应用于临床实践。
NCT03547076。