• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支撑预后不良儿童癌症治疗决策的家长价值观和偏好:范围综述。

Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision-making in poor-prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

The Oak Centre for Children and Young People, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2022 Oct 14;22(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03635-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-022-03635-1
PMID:36229792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9563461/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parents of children who are diagnosed with a poor-prognosis cancer want to be involved in making treatment-related decisions for their child. They often make repeated decisions depending on their child's response to treatment and can experience decisional regret as a consequence. Understanding parent values and preferences when making treatment-related decisions may help enhance discussions with healthcare professionals and identify additional ways of providing support to this parent population.

OBJECTIVES

To explore parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision-making for children receiving cancer-directed therapy for a poor prognosis cancer.

METHODS

A scoping review of research literature and systematic reviews from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Articles which included parents of a child who received cancer-directed therapy for a poor-prognosis childhood cancer, under the age of eighteen years were considered. Four electronic databases were searched (CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science Core Collections). Reference and citation lists of all included full-text articles were also searched. Summative content analysis was used to synthesise findings and develop themes.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included. Parent decision-making was affected by underpinning factors: hope for a cure, fear of their child dying and uncertainty. Influencing factors: opinions of others, child's wishes, and faith and religion had the potential to inform decision-making processes. Parents valued having enough time, being a good parent and being involved in decision-making. Preferences within these values varied resulting in the potential for conflict and 'trade-offs' in making decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Parent decision-making in poor-prognosis childhood cancer is complex and extends beyond values and preferences. Underpinning factors and values are consistent through the decision-making process with influencing factors and preferences varying between parents. Preferences can conflict when parents want to continue cancer-directed therapy whilst maintaining their child's quality of life or can change depending on a parents' cognitive state as they realise cure might be unlikely.

摘要

背景

被诊断患有预后不良癌症的儿童的父母希望参与为其孩子做出与治疗相关的决策。他们经常根据孩子对治疗的反应反复做出决定,因此可能会感到决策后悔。了解父母在做出与治疗相关的决策时的价值观和偏好,可以帮助加强与医疗保健专业人员的讨论,并确定为这一父母群体提供额外支持的其他方式。

目的

探讨为接受预后不良癌症定向治疗的儿童做出治疗决策时父母的价值观和偏好。

方法

采用循证卫生保健国际合作组织( Joanna Briggs Institute )方法,对定性、定量和混合方法研究的研究文献和系统评价进行了范围综述。纳入了接受癌症定向治疗的预后不良儿童癌症的儿童的父母的文章,年龄在 18 岁以下。在四个电子数据库( CINAHL 、 Medline 、 PsychINFO 、 Web of Science Core Collections )中进行了搜索。还搜索了所有纳入的全文文章的参考文献和引文列表。使用总结性内容分析来综合研究结果并开发主题。

结果

共纳入 12 篇文章。父母的决策受到潜在因素的影响:治愈的希望、对孩子死亡的恐惧和不确定性。影响因素:他人的意见、孩子的意愿以及信仰和宗教,有可能为决策过程提供信息。父母重视有足够的时间、做一个好父母并参与决策。这些价值观中的偏好因人而异,导致在做出决策时存在潜在的冲突和“权衡”。

结论

预后不良儿童癌症的父母决策复杂,不仅限于价值观和偏好。在决策过程中,潜在因素和价值观是一致的,而影响因素和偏好因父母而异。当父母希望继续癌症定向治疗同时维持孩子的生活质量,或者当父母意识到治愈的可能性不大时,偏好可能会发生冲突,或者偏好可能会根据父母的认知状态而改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a440/9563461/ba7318d03943/12887_2022_3635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a440/9563461/9619a3973f45/12887_2022_3635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a440/9563461/ba7318d03943/12887_2022_3635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a440/9563461/9619a3973f45/12887_2022_3635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a440/9563461/ba7318d03943/12887_2022_3635_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision-making in poor-prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review.支撑预后不良儿童癌症治疗决策的家长价值观和偏好:范围综述。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Oct 14;22(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03635-1.
2
Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision making in poor prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review protocol.父母在预后不良的儿童癌症治疗决策中的价值观和偏好:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e046284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046284.
3
Decision-Making Quality in Parents Considering Adenotonsillectomy or Tympanostomy Tube Insertion for Their Children.父母在考虑为孩子行腺样体切除术或鼓膜切开置管术时的决策质量。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):260-266. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3365.
4
Child and Parental Perspectives on Communication and Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Focus Group Study.儿童和家长对小儿慢性肾脏病沟通和决策的观点:一项焦点小组研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Oct;72(4):547-559. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
5
Identifying a conceptual shift in child and adolescent-reported treatment decision making: "Having a say, as I need at this time".确定儿童和青少年报告的治疗决策中的概念转变:“在我此时需要的时候,有发言权”。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Apr;64(4). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26262. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
6
Exploring the vagueness of Religion & Spirituality in complex pediatric decision-making: a qualitative study.探索宗教和灵性在复杂儿科决策中的模糊性:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Sep 12;17(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0360-y.
7
Parent perspectives on information about late effects of childhood cancer treatment and their role in initial treatment decision making.家长对儿童癌症治疗后期影响信息的看法及其在初始治疗决策中的作用。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Jun;65(6):e26978. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26978. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
8
Treatment Decision Making and Regret in Parents of Children With Incurable Cancer.无法治愈癌症患儿父母的治疗决策和遗憾。
Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(3):E131-E141. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000783.
9
How 'significant others' may support parents with decision-making about their child's cancer care: An integrative literature review.“重要他人”如何在孩子癌症治疗决策方面为父母提供支持:一项综合文献综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 May;32(9-10):1821-1840. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16220. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10
Parent and carer experiences of health care professionals' communications about a child's higher weight: a qualitative systematic review.家长及照顾者对医疗保健专业人员就儿童超重问题所进行沟通的体验:一项定性系统综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2025 Apr 1;23(4):576-637. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00056. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment acceptability for disease-modifying therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D)-Views from parents of children with presymptomatic T1D.1型糖尿病(T1D)疾病改善疗法的治疗可接受性——来自症状前T1D患儿家长的观点
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Oct;27(10):6059-6067. doi: 10.1111/dom.16639. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Advance Care Planning Conversations in Pediatric Patients with Refractory Oncologic Disease.患有难治性肿瘤疾病的儿科患者的预先护理计划谈话
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;12(4):479. doi: 10.3390/children12040479.
3
Hoping Against Hope: Ethical Considerations when Trying Unproven Treatments for Seriously Ill Children.

本文引用的文献

1
Arksey and O'Malley's consultation exercise in scoping reviews: A critical review.阿特金和奥马利的范围综述咨询实践:批判性评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Aug;78(8):2304-2312. doi: 10.1111/jan.15265. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Setting international standards for patient and parent involvement and engagement in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer research: A report from a European Collaborative Workshop.为儿童、青少年和青年癌症研究制定患者和家长参与国际标准:欧洲协作研讨会的报告。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Jun;5(6):e1523. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1523. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
3
Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision making in poor prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review protocol.
抱一线希望:为重症儿童尝试未经证实的治疗方法时的伦理考量。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Feb 27;17(2):279-291. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00340-2. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Integration of patient and public involvement in a doctoral research study using the research cycle.运用研究周期将患者及公众参与纳入博士研究项目
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 9;10(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00620-z.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the supportive care needs survey for caregivers of children with Paediatric cancer (SCNS-C-Ped-C).中文版儿童癌症照顾者支持性护理需求量表(SCNS-C-Ped-C)的心理计量学评估。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4196-4204. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1703. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
6
Using Evidence-Based Medicine to Support Clinical Decision-Making in RMS.运用循证医学支持横纹肌肉瘤的临床决策制定。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;15(1):66. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010066.
父母在预后不良的儿童癌症治疗决策中的价值观和偏好:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e046284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046284.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Patient researchers - the missing link?患者研究者——缺失的环节?
Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1507. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1080-4.
6
Regret and unfinished business in parents bereaved by cancer: A mixed methods study.癌症丧亲父母的遗憾和未竟之事:一项混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;34(3):367-377. doi: 10.1177/0269216319900301. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Unrealistic parental expectations for cure in poor-prognosis childhood cancer.家长对预后不良的儿童癌症治愈的不切实际期望。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 15;126(2):416-424. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32553. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
8
Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare.关于如何制定复杂干预措施以改善健康和医疗保健的指南。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954.
9
Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview.开发改善健康干预措施的方法分类:系统方法概述
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Mar 12;5:41. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6. eCollection 2019.
10
Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents' and adolescents' views and perceptions.儿童癌症决策:父母和青少年的观点和看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Nov;27(11):4331-4340. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04728-x. Epub 2019 Mar 18.