Suppr超能文献

阻塞性气道疾病的计算表型分析:系统评价方案。

Computational phenotyping of obstructive airway diseases: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Section of Sustainable Health/the OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 13;11(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02078-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, computational sciences have contributed immensely to characterization of phenotypes of airway diseases, but it is difficult to compare derived phenotypes across studies, perhaps as a result of the different decisions that fed into these phenotyping exercises. We aim to perform a systematic review of studies using computational approaches to phenotype obstructive airway diseases in children and adults.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for papers published between 2010 and 2020. Conferences proceedings, reference list of included papers, and experts will form additional sources of literature. We will include observational epidemiological studies that used a computational approach to derive phenotypes of chronic airway diseases, whether in a general population or in a clinical setting. Two reviewers will independently screen the retrieved studies for eligibility, extract relevant data, and perform quality appraisal of included studies. A third reviewer will arbitrate any disagreements in these processes. Quality appraisal of the studies will be undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool. We will use summary tables to describe the included studies. We will narratively synthesize the generated evidence, providing critical assessment of the populations, variables, and computational approaches used in deriving the phenotypes across studies CONCLUSION: As progress continues to be made in the area of computational phenotyping of chronic obstructive airway diseases, this systematic review, the first on this topic, will provide the state of the art on the field and highlight important perspectives for future works.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval is needed for this work is based only on the published literature and does not involve collection of any primary or human data.

REGISTRATION AND REPORTING

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020164898.

摘要

背景

在过去的十年中,计算科学极大地促进了气道疾病表型的特征描述,但由于这些表型研究中采用的不同决策,很难对衍生的表型进行比较。我们旨在对使用计算方法对儿童和成人阻塞性气道疾病进行表型分析的研究进行系统评价。

方法和分析

我们将在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 中搜索 2010 年至 2020 年期间发表的论文。会议记录、纳入论文的参考文献列表和专家将构成文献的其他来源。我们将纳入使用计算方法推导慢性气道疾病表型的观察性流行病学研究,无论这些研究是在一般人群中还是在临床环境中进行。两名审查员将独立筛选检索到的研究以确定其是否符合纳入标准,提取相关数据,并对纳入研究进行质量评估。如果在这些过程中存在分歧,将由第三名审查员进行仲裁。将使用有效公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具对研究进行质量评估。我们将使用总结表来描述纳入的研究。我们将对生成的证据进行叙述性综合,批判性评估在不同研究中推导表型所使用的人群、变量和计算方法。

结论

随着计算方法在慢性阻塞性气道疾病表型分析领域的不断进步,这篇系统评价,也是该主题的第一篇系统评价,将提供该领域的最新情况,并强调未来工作的重要观点。

伦理与传播

这项工作不需要伦理批准,仅基于已发表的文献,不涉及任何原始或人类数据的收集。

注册和报告

系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42020164898。

相似文献

9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

4
Informatics and machine learning to define the phenotype.信息学和机器学习定义表型。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Mar;18(3):219-226. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1439380. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
Improving the quality of the evidence - The necessity to lead by example.提高证据质量——以身作则的必要性。
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;46:165-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
8
Electronic medical record phenotyping using the anchor and learn framework.使用锚定与学习框架进行电子病历表型分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):731-40. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw011. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验