Department of Health Sciences, Nursing, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Hospital District of Satakunta, Pori, Finland.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4391-4407. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16506. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
The aim of this scoping review was to describe the instruments used to assess the knowledge and skills of evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare settings.
A scoping review was undertaken. Three electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed and Cochrane) were searched in January 2022. The search phrases consisted of the following terms: healthcare professionals, EBP, competence and instrument and their synonyms, keywords and MeSH terms. The database search was run without any limitations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to support reporting.
Ultimately, 39 studies were included; most of them (35) were cross-sectional studies. The studies were conducted in 17 countries. A total of 17 evidence-based knowledge and skills instruments were identified. The Upton and Upton instrument was used in 19 studies. Twelve self-reported instruments were used only once. The psychometric properties of the instruments varied. The reliability was typically reported with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The content of the EBP knowledge/skills instruments consists of five main categories: EBP, evaluation of current practice, preparation for the implementation of EBP, implementation of evidence and active participation in the development of EBP.
Almost all instruments are self-assessment instruments. Validated knowledge tests should be further developed. The instruments emphasise the preparation for the implementation of EBP. Further research is needed to develop instruments for healthcare professionals to assess the knowledge and skills of the implementation of evidence.
本范围综述旨在描述用于评估医疗环境中循证实践(EBP)知识和技能的工具。
进行了范围综述。2022 年 1 月,在三个电子数据库(CINAHL、PubMed 和 Cochrane)中进行了搜索。搜索词包括以下术语:医疗保健专业人员、EBP、能力和工具及其同义词、关键词和 MeSH 术语。数据库搜索没有任何限制。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南以支持报告。
最终纳入了 39 项研究;其中大多数(35 项)是横断面研究。这些研究在 17 个国家进行。确定了 17 种基于证据的知识和技能工具。Upton 和 Upton 工具在 19 项研究中使用。只有 12 种自我报告工具仅使用过一次。工具的心理测量特性各不相同。通常使用 Cronbach's alpha 系数报告可靠性。EBP 知识/技能工具的内容包括五个主要类别:EBP、当前实践评估、EBP 实施准备、证据实施和积极参与 EBP 发展。
几乎所有的工具都是自我评估工具。应进一步开发经过验证的知识测试。这些工具强调了 EBP 实施的准备。需要进一步研究开发用于评估医疗保健专业人员实施证据的知识和技能的工具。