Molina-Ramos Ana Isabel, Ruiz-Salas Amalio, Medina-Palomo Carmen, Pavón-Morón Francisco Javier, Rodríguez-Capitán Jorge, Gutiérrez-Bedmar Mario, Berteli-García Germán, Fernández-Lozano Ignacio, Gómez-Doblas Juan José, Jiménez-Navarro Manuel, Alzueta-Rodríguez Javier, Barrera-Cordero Alberto
Unidad de Gestión Clínica del Corazón, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND and Universidad de Málaga, 29590 Málaga, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 3;11(19):5862. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195862.
Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is a well-established rhythm control therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, there is no consensus on which ablation technique to use for the first procedure, cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1055 patients who underwent a first ablation, to assess both techniques based on the need for reablation. Patients with CB (n = 557) and RF (n = 498) ablations were clinically characterized and the need for reablation during a 30-month follow-up was used as the primary endpoint. Independent variables were analyzed to identify potential predictors. The need for reablation was significantly lower in the CB group than in the RF group (hazard ratio = 0.45 and 95% confident interval = 0.32−0.61; p < 0.001); in both paroxysmal and persistent AF, using a full-adjusted regression Cox model by age, sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, severe obstructive sleep apnea, dilated left atrium, persistent AF and early recurrence. RF ablation, dilated left atrium, persistent AF and early recurrence were identified as independent predictors of reablation. In addition, the CB-redo subgroup had a lower PV reconnection than the RF-redo subgroup. In conclusion, CB ablation suggests a reduction in the need for reablation and lower PV reconnection during the follow-up than RF ablation.
肺静脉隔离是心房颤动(AF)中一种成熟的节律控制疗法。目前,对于首次手术应采用哪种消融技术,即冷冻球囊(CB)还是射频(RF),尚无共识。对1055例接受首次消融的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以根据再次消融的需求评估这两种技术。对接受CB消融(n = 557)和RF消融(n = 498)的患者进行临床特征分析,并将30个月随访期间再次消融的需求作为主要终点。分析独立变量以确定潜在的预测因素。CB组再次消融的需求显著低于RF组(风险比= 0.45,95%置信区间= 0.32 - 0.61;p < 0.001);在阵发性和持续性AF中,通过年龄、性别、吸烟、高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常、重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、左心房扩大、持续性AF和早期复发使用完全调整回归Cox模型。RF消融、左心房扩大、持续性AF和早期复发被确定为再次消融的独立预测因素。此外,CB再次消融亚组的肺静脉重新连接低于RF再次消融亚组。总之,与RF消融相比,CB消融表明随访期间再次消融的需求减少且肺静脉重新连接更低。