Department of Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, Mommsenstrasse 4, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Molecules. 2022 Oct 5;27(19):6587. doi: 10.3390/molecules27196587.
COX-2 can be considered as a clinically relevant molecular target for adjuvant, in particular radiosensitizing treatments. In this regard, using selective COX-2 inhibitors, e.g., in combination with radiotherapy or endoradiotherapy, represents an interesting treatment option. Based on our own findings that nitric oxide (NO)-releasing and celecoxib-derived COX-2 inhibitors (COXIBs) showed promising radiosensitizing effects in vitro, we herein present the development of a series of eight novel NO-COXIBs differing in the peripheral substitution pattern and their chemical and in vitro characterization. COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition potency was found to be comparable to the lead NO-COXIBs, and NO-releasing properties were demonstrated to be mainly influenced by the substituent in 4-position of the pyrazole (Cl vs. H). Introduction of the -propionamide at the sulfamoyl residue as a potential prodrug strategy lowered lipophilicity markedly and abolished COX inhibition while NO-releasing properties were not markedly influenced. NO-COXIBs were tested in vitro for a combination with single-dose external X-ray irradiation as well as [Lu]LuCl treatment in HIF2α-positive mouse pheochromocytoma (MPC-HIF2a) tumor spheroids. When applied directly before X-ray irradiation or Lu treatment, NO-COXIBs showed radioprotective effects, as did celecoxib, which was used as a control. Radiosensitizing effects were observed when applied shortly after X-ray irradiation. Overall, the NO-COXIBs were found to be more radioprotective compared with celecoxib, which does not warrant further preclinical studies with the NO-COXIBs for the treatment of pheochromocytoma. However, evaluation as radioprotective agents for healthy tissues could be considered for the NO-COXIBs developed here, especially when used directly before irradiation.
COX-2 可以被视为辅助治疗,特别是放射增敏治疗的一个有临床意义的分子靶点。在这方面,使用选择性 COX-2 抑制剂,例如与放射治疗或内放射治疗联合使用,是一种很有前途的治疗选择。基于我们自己的发现,即一氧化氮(NO)释放和塞来昔布衍生的 COX-2 抑制剂(COXIBs)在体外表现出有希望的放射增敏作用,我们在此介绍了一系列新型 NO-COXIBs 的开发,这些抑制剂在周边取代模式上有所不同,并对其进行了化学和体外特性的表征。结果发现,COX-1 和 COX-2 的抑制活性与先导 NO-COXIBs 相当,NO 释放特性主要受吡唑 4 位取代基(Cl 与 H)的影响。将磺酰胺残基上的 -丙酰胺作为潜在的前药策略引入,可显著降低脂溶性,同时完全消除 COX 抑制作用,而对 NO 释放特性的影响不大。在体外,NO-COXIBs 与单次外照射 X 射线以及 [Lu]LuCl 治疗相结合,在 HIF2α 阳性小鼠嗜铬细胞瘤(MPC-HIF2a)肿瘤球体中进行了测试。当在 X 射线照射或 Lu 治疗前直接应用时,NO-COXIBs 表现出放射保护作用,塞来昔布也具有这种作用,塞来昔布被用作对照。在 X 射线照射后不久应用时,观察到放射增敏作用。总的来说,与塞来昔布相比,NO-COXIBs 表现出更强的放射保护作用,因此不需要对 NO-COXIBs 进行用于治疗嗜铬细胞瘤的进一步临床前研究。然而,对于这里开发的 NO-COXIBs,可以考虑将其作为健康组织的放射保护剂,特别是在照射前直接使用时。