Suppr超能文献

藏毛窦手术中Limberg皮瓣与Karydakis皮瓣修复的比较:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。

Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Repair in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Alkurt Ertugrul G, Vardar Yaşar Murat, Tüzün İshak Sefa

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Hitit Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum, TUR.

Department of General Surgery, University of Medical Sciences Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Sep 8;14(9):e28933. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28933. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammation and infection of the sacrococcygeal region. It often affects young adult males and produces clinical findings with abscess and discharge in the sacrococcygeal region or painful sinus tract in the natal cleft. The best surgical technique for sacrococcygeal PSD is still disputed. This study aimed to compare the Karydakis flap technique (KFT) and Limberg flap technique (LFT) used in the surgical treatment of the sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Methodology A total of 140 patients diagnosed with pilonidal sinus between 2010 and 2012 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups, namely, LFT (n = 73) and KFT (n = 67). Preoperative findings of the patients, surgical findings, and short and long-term postoperative findings were recorded and statistically compared. Results Regarding cosmetic results, the Karydakis flap was better than the Limberg flap with a faster return to normal life. There was no statistical difference between the two groups concerning wound dehiscence, postoperative visual analog scale scores, seroma formation, and recurrence. Conclusions Considering the faster return to normal life and greater cosmetic satisfaction of the patients, the KFT should be chosen instead of the LFT as the standard technique in pilonidal sinus surgery.

摘要

背景 藏毛窦疾病(PSD)是一种发生于骶尾部的慢性炎症和感染。它常影响年轻成年男性,临床表现为骶尾部脓肿、有分泌物或臀间裂处有疼痛性窦道。骶尾部PSD的最佳手术技术仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较用于骶尾部藏毛窦手术治疗的卡里达基斯皮瓣技术(KFT)和林贝格皮瓣技术(LFT)。方法 本研究纳入了2010年至2012年间共140例诊断为藏毛窦的患者。患者被分为两组,即LFT组(n = 73)和KFT组(n = 67)。记录患者的术前检查结果、手术结果以及术后短期和长期检查结果,并进行统计学比较。结果 在美容效果方面,卡里达基斯皮瓣优于林贝格皮瓣,患者能更快恢复正常生活。两组在伤口裂开、术后视觉模拟评分、血清肿形成和复发方面无统计学差异。结论 考虑到患者能更快恢复正常生活且美容满意度更高,在藏毛窦手术中应选择KFT而非LFT作为标准技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/665e/9547553/a2b9b4c7c4f7/cureus-0014-00000028933-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验