• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用半腱肌腱联合 LARS 合成材料重建前交叉韧带的早期临床结果。

Early Clinical Outcomes of ACL Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus Tendon Combined with LARS Synthetic.

机构信息

The First Operating Room, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun City, Jilin Province 130021, China.

Department of Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun City, Jilin Province 130021, China.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 30;2022:2845114. doi: 10.1155/2022/2845114. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/2845114
PMID:36238490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9553347/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the early clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction using the augmented semitendinosus tendon combined with LARS synthetic material and the autologous hamstring tendons.

METHODS

A total of 68 eligible patients with ACL rupture were reconstructed using either 4-strand autologous hamstring tendons, representing the control group, or the LARS synthetic material augmented grafts. The duration of postoperative swelling and recovery exercise was recorded. Lysholm and IKDC scores were used for evaluation of knee joint function. Lachman and pivot shift tests were conducted to evaluate stability.

RESULTS

The scores of the three knee functions in cases of the augmentation group were significantly higher than those of the control group 6 months after surgery ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences in Tegner score in the two groups 12 months after surgery ( > 0.05). In general, the augmentation group returned to exercise 12 weeks after surgery, while the control group required 30 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that synthetic material augmentation grafts allow earlier return to exercise and display more satisfactory results compared with the control group.

摘要

目的

比较 ACL 重建中使用增强型半腱肌腱联合 LARS 合成材料与自体腘绳肌腱的早期临床结果。

方法

共有 68 例 ACL 断裂的患者符合条件,分别使用 4 股自体腘绳肌腱(对照组)或 LARS 合成材料增强移植物进行重建。记录术后肿胀和恢复运动的持续时间。采用 Lysholm 和 IKDC 评分评估膝关节功能。行 Lachman 和轴移试验评估稳定性。

结果

术后 6 个月,增强组的膝关节 3 项功能评分明显高于对照组(<0.05)。术后 12 个月,两组的 Tegner 评分无显著差异(>0.05)。总体而言,增强组术后 12 周即可恢复运动,而对照组则需要 30 周。

结论

本研究表明,与对照组相比,合成材料增强移植物可更早地恢复运动,并获得更满意的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/d48ec6696b9b/CMMM2022-2845114.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/51dc71d5409a/CMMM2022-2845114.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/30f4f724e84a/CMMM2022-2845114.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/930eb0ec0442/CMMM2022-2845114.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/b7c84b052b16/CMMM2022-2845114.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/1b564769acf6/CMMM2022-2845114.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/d48ec6696b9b/CMMM2022-2845114.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/51dc71d5409a/CMMM2022-2845114.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/30f4f724e84a/CMMM2022-2845114.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/930eb0ec0442/CMMM2022-2845114.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/b7c84b052b16/CMMM2022-2845114.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/1b564769acf6/CMMM2022-2845114.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f50/9553347/d48ec6696b9b/CMMM2022-2845114.006.jpg

相似文献

1
Early Clinical Outcomes of ACL Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus Tendon Combined with LARS Synthetic.采用半腱肌腱联合 LARS 合成材料重建前交叉韧带的早期临床结果。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 30;2022:2845114. doi: 10.1155/2022/2845114. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical and arthroscopic outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings augmented with ligament augmentation and reconstruction systems compared with four-strand hamstring tendon grafts alone.与单纯四股绳肌腱移植相比,使用自体腘绳肌并辅以韧带增强和重建系统进行单束前交叉韧带重建的临床和关节镜检查结果。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jan;47(1):151-164. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05588-7. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
3
LARS versus hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-centre, single surgeon retrospective study with 8 years of follow-up.前交叉韧带重建中LARS人工韧带与自体腘绳肌腱移植的比较:一项单中心、单术者的8年随访回顾性研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Feb;29(2):447-453. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2304-x. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Hybrid Graft Versus a Hamstring Autograft.前交叉韧带重建中使用混合移植物与半腱肌自体移植物的临床结果比较。
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1508-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
5
Comparison of results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a four-strand single semitendinosus or a semitendinosus and gracilis tendon.使用四股单股半腱肌或半腱肌与股薄肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建后的结果比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Nov;23(11):3238-43. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3076-4. Epub 2014 May 20.
6
A retrospective study to compare the clinical effects of individualized anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.一项回顾性研究比较了个体化解剖学单束和双束前交叉韧带重建手术的临床效果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71721-4.
7
Network meta-analysis of knee outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with various types of tendon grafts.各种类型肌腱移植物重建前交叉韧带后膝关节结局的网状 Meta 分析。
Int Orthop. 2020 Feb;44(2):365-380. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04417-8. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Follow-up.腘绳肌腱移植的经关节镜前交叉韧带重建加关节外外侧肌腱固定术:至少20年随访的前瞻性评估
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;45(14):3233-3242. doi: 10.1177/0363546517723013. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Augmented short undersized hamstring tendon graft with LARS® artificial ligament versus four-strand hamstring tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: preliminary results.前交叉韧带重建中使用LARS®人工韧带增强的短缩腘绳肌腱移植与四股腘绳肌腱移植的对比:初步结果
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Sep;101(5):535-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.021. Epub 2015 May 18.
10
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts.前交叉韧带重建:股四头肌肌腱自体移植物与骨-髌腱-骨和腘绳肌腱自体移植物的结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Early clinical outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft tendon augmentation using the LARS internal brace ligament.使用LARS内置支撑韧带自体肌腱增强技术进行全关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的早期临床结果
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 15;13:1556106. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1556106. eCollection 2025.
2
Hamstring tendon graft with LARS augmentation showed superior short-term clinical efficacy compared to hamstring tendon alone as graft in ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.带 LARS 增强的腘绳肌腱移植物在 ACL 重建中与单独使用腘绳肌腱移植物相比,具有更好的短期临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 10;19(1):742. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05234-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Internal Suture Augmentation Technique to Protect the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft.保护前交叉韧带重建移植物的内缝合增强技术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Sep 18;6(5):e1633-e1638. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.020. eCollection 2017 Oct.
2
Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.移植物直径作为翻修前交叉韧带重建以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)与欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)值的预测指标:一项基于瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处2240例患者的队列研究
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2092-2097. doi: 10.1177/0363546517704177. Epub 2017 May 1.
3
An Arthroscopic Second-Look Study on the Effect of Remnant Preservation on Synovialization of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
关节镜下二次观察研究:保留残端对前交叉韧带重建中骨-髌腱-骨同种异体移植滑膜化的影响
Arthroscopy. 2016 May;32(5):868-77. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.017. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
Augmented short undersized hamstring tendon graft with LARS® artificial ligament versus four-strand hamstring tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: preliminary results.前交叉韧带重建中使用LARS®人工韧带增强的短缩腘绳肌腱移植与四股腘绳肌腱移植的对比:初步结果
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Sep;101(5):535-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.021. Epub 2015 May 18.
5
Synthetic devices for reconstructive surgery of the cruciate ligaments: a systematic review.用于交叉韧带重建手术的合成装置:一项系统综述。
Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):957-68. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.032. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
6
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of femoral anterior cruciate ligament stump.保留股骨前交叉韧带残端的前交叉韧带重建术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2014 Sep 15;3(5):e575-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2014.06.012. eCollection 2014 Oct.
7
Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.年龄、移植物大小和 Tegner 活动水平是前交叉韧带重建中使用自体腘绳肌腱移植物失败的预测因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1808-12. doi: 10.1177/0363546513493896. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
8
Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.预测前交叉韧带重建后腘绳肌腱移植物直径和失败率的因素。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 May;21(5):1111-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2085-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
9
Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.骨隧道内的肌腱愈合。第二部分:绵羊前交叉韧带重建模型中可生物降解干涉配合固定后的组织学分析。
Arthroscopy. 2002 Feb;18(2):124-35. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.30657.
10
Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part I: Biomechanical results after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.骨隧道内的肌腱愈合。第一部分:在绵羊前交叉韧带重建模型中采用可生物降解的干涉配合固定后的生物力学结果。
Arthroscopy. 2002 Feb;18(2):113-23. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.30656.