• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态动脉僵硬度指数较高个体的最大日间动态血压与中风风险:JAMP研究

Maximum ambulatory daytime blood pressure and risk of stroke in individuals with higher ambulatory arterial stiffness index: the JAMP study.

作者信息

Hoshide Satoshi, Tomitani Naoko, Kario Kazuomi

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2023 Jan;46(1):84-90. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01048-2. Epub 2022 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1038/s41440-022-01048-2
PMID:36243763
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether a high daytime maximum blood pressure (BP) assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) constitutes a risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events, especially in those with increased arterial stiffness, because BP variability is linked to arterial stiffness. A total of 6294 participants (mean age, 68.6 ± 11.7 years; 78% treated hypertensive patients), who had at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor, were followed for 4.5 years. Daytime maximum BP was calculated as the highest 1-hour moving average of 2 consecutive systolic BP (SBP) readings during the daytime. The ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) was calculated as 1 minus the slope of the linear regression line between SBP and diastolic BP during 24-hour BP. During the follow-up, there were 217 ASCVD events (119 stroke and 98 coronary artery disease [CAD]). In the higher-AASI group (≥0.5783), subjects in the top quartile of daytime maximum SBP (≥179.4 mmHg) had a greater risk of stroke events compared to those in other quartiles (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.15). In the higher-AASI group, participants with 24-hour SBP of 130 mmHg or more and in the top quartile of daytime maximum SBP had an adjusted HR (95%CI) of 2.55 (1.32-4.95) compared to those without. The analysis did not suggest that daytime maximum SBP posed a risk for CAD events and in the lower-AASI group. Daytime maximum SBP did pose a risk of stroke events, especially for those with higher arterial stiffness represented as AASI.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定通过动态血压监测(ABPM)评估的日间最高血压(BP)是否构成动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)事件的风险,尤其是在动脉僵硬度增加的人群中,因为血压变异性与动脉僵硬度相关。共有6294名参与者(平均年龄68.6±11.7岁;78%为接受治疗的高血压患者),他们至少有1种心血管危险因素,随访时间为4.5年。日间最高血压计算为日间连续2次收缩压(SBP)读数的最高1小时移动平均值。动态动脉僵硬度指数(AASI)计算为24小时血压期间SBP与舒张压之间线性回归线斜率的相反数。随访期间,发生217例ASCVD事件(119例卒中,98例冠状动脉疾病[CAD])。在较高AASI组(≥0.5783)中,日间最高SBP处于最高四分位数(≥179.4 mmHg)的受试者与其他四分位数的受试者相比,发生卒中事件的风险更高(调整后风险比[HR],1.89;95%置信区间[CI],1.13 - 3.15)。在较高AASI组中,24小时SBP为130 mmHg或更高且日间最高SBP处于最高四分位数的参与者与未达到此标准的参与者相比,调整后HR(95%CI)为2.55(1.32 - 4.95)。分析未表明日间最高SBP对CAD事件构成风险,且在较低AASI组中也未发现此关联。日间最高SBP确实构成卒中事件的风险,尤其是对于以AASI表示的动脉僵硬度较高的人群。

相似文献

1
Maximum ambulatory daytime blood pressure and risk of stroke in individuals with higher ambulatory arterial stiffness index: the JAMP study.动态动脉僵硬度指数较高个体的最大日间动态血压与中风风险:JAMP研究
Hypertens Res. 2023 Jan;46(1):84-90. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01048-2. Epub 2022 Oct 16.
2
Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index (AASI) is Unable to Estimate Arterial Stiffness of Hypertensive Subjects: Role of Nocturnal Dipping of Blood Pressure.动态动脉僵硬度指数(AASI)无法评估高血压患者的动脉僵硬度:夜间血压波动的作用
Curr Hypertens Rev. 2017;13(2):121-131. doi: 10.2174/1573402113666170621110305.
3
Ambulatory arterial stiffness index as a predictor of blood pressure response to renal denervation.动态动脉硬化指数可预测肾去神经术对血压的反应。
J Hypertens. 2018 Jun;36(6):1414-1422. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001682.
4
Ambulatory arterial stiffness index correlates with ambulatory pulse pressure but not dipping status in patients with grade 1/grade 2 essential hypertension.动态动脉僵硬度指数与1级/2级原发性高血压患者的动态脉压相关,但与血压昼夜节律无关。
J Int Med Res. 2014 Dec;42(6):1323-34. doi: 10.1177/0300060514548288. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
5
Arterial stiffness index based on home (HASI) vs. ambulatory (AASI) blood pressure measurements.基于家庭(HASI)和动态血压测量(AASI)的动脉僵硬度指数。
Hypertens Res. 2010 Jul;33(7):731-6. doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.62. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
6
High Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Is an Independent Risk Factor for Rapid Age-Related Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline in the General Middle-Aged Population.高动态动脉僵硬度指数是一般中年人群中与年龄相关的肾小球滤过率快速下降的独立危险因素。
Hypertension. 2017 Apr;69(4):651-659. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09020. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and its relation to ambulatory arterial stiffness index in hypertensive patients.二维斑点追踪超声心动图检测的亚临床左心室收缩功能障碍与高血压患者动态动脉硬化指数的关系。
J Hypertens. 2020 May;38(5):864-873. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002330.
8
Association of stroke with ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) in hypertensive patients.高血压患者的卒中与动态动脉僵硬度指数(AASI)的相关性。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2011;33(5):304-8. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2010.549261. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
9
Symmetric ambulatory arterial stiffness index in the young.年轻人的对称动态动脉僵硬度指数
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Jun;10(6):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.03.185. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
10
Ambulatory arterial stiffness index as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in the Dublin Outcome Study.在都柏林结果研究中,动态动脉僵硬度指数作为心血管死亡率的预测指标。
Hypertension. 2006 Mar;47(3):365-70. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000200699.74641.c5. Epub 2006 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Sleep Disorders and Stroke: Pathophysiological Links, Clinical Implications, and Management Strategies.睡眠障碍与中风:病理生理联系、临床意义及管理策略
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(3):113. doi: 10.3390/medsci13030113.
2
What are the ideal metrics for assessing the quality of long-term stabilized "perfect" 24-h BP control after renal denervation?评估肾去神经术后长期稳定的“完美”24 小时血压控制质量的理想指标是什么?
Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2644-2651. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01859-5. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
The role of wearable home blood pressure monitoring in detecting out-of-office control status.
可穿戴式家庭血压监测在检测非诊室血压控制状况中的作用。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Apr;47(4):1033-1041. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01539-w.
4
Ambulatory arterial stiffness index, mortality, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes; Systematic review and meta-analysis.动态动脉硬化指数、死亡率和不良心血管结局;系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Feb;26(2):89-101. doi: 10.1111/jch.14755. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome: from hypothesis to evidence.系统性血流动力学动脉粥样血栓综合征:从假设到证据。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Mar;47(3):579-585. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01459-9. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
2023 update and perspectives.2023 年更新及展望。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Jan;47(1):6-32. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01398-5. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
7
Evidence for the surge blood pressure resonance hypothesis as a trigger for cardiovascular disease events.作为心血管疾病事件触发因素的血压激增共振假说的证据。
Hypertens Res. 2023 Sep;46(9):2065-2069. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01346-3. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
8
Short- to long-term blood pressure variability: Current evidence and new evaluations.短期至长期血压变异性:当前证据与新评估
Hypertens Res. 2023 Apr;46(4):950-958. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01199-w. Epub 2023 Feb 9.