Suppr超能文献

动态动脉硬化指数可预测肾去神经术对血压的反应。

Ambulatory arterial stiffness index as a predictor of blood pressure response to renal denervation.

机构信息

Neurovascular Hypertension and Kidney Disease Laboratory.

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2018 Jun;36(6):1414-1422. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001682.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) can reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension, but less so in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. A possible explanation is that patients with stiffer arteries may have lesser neural contribution to their hypertension.

METHOD

We hypothesized that arterial stiffness predicts the response to RDN. From ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) was calculated as 1 - the regression slope of DBP versus SBP.

RESULTS

In 111 patients with resistant hypertension, RDN reduced office and 24-h SBP after 3, 6, and 12 months (by -11 ± 22, -11 ± 25, -14 ± 21 mmHg for office, and -4 ± 11, -5 ± 12, -5 ± 15 mmHg for 24-h SBP, respectively, P < 0.01). Patients with baseline AASI above the median (>0.51) showed no change in 24-h SBP at 6 months after RDN (-0.4 ± 12.3 mmHg, P > 0.05), whereas an AASI below 0.51was associated with a marked reduction (-9.3 ± 11.0 mmHg, P < 0.01). Across AASI quartiles, patients in the highest quartile (AASI ≥ 0.60) had lower muscle sympathetic nerve activity than the other three quartiles (39 ± 13 versus 49 ± 13 bursts/min, P = 0.035). The responder rate, defined as a 24-h SBP reduction of at least 5% was 58% in the lowest AASI quartile (<0.45) and 16% in the highest quartile (≥0.60). After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, office and 24-h SBP, an AASI less than 0.51predicted those who respond to RDN (odds ratio 3.46, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in patients with resistant hypertension, a lower AASI is an independent predictor of the BP response to RDN, possibly explained by a more pronounced neurogenic rather than biomechanical contribution to their BP elevation.

摘要

背景

肾去神经术(RDN)可降低抗药性高血压患者的血压,但对单纯收缩期高血压患者的降压效果较小。一种可能的解释是,动脉僵硬的患者其高血压可能较少受到神经的影响。

方法

我们假设动脉僵硬可预测 RDN 的反应。通过动态血压监测(ABPM),计算出动态动脉僵硬指数(AASI),其定义为舒张压与收缩压之间回归斜率的 1-1。

结果

在 111 例抗药性高血压患者中,RDN 可降低诊室和 24 小时收缩压,在 3、6 和 12 个月后分别降低 11±22、11±25、14±21mmHg(诊室)和 4±11、5±12、5±15mmHg(24 小时收缩压)(P<0.01)。基线 AASI 高于中位数(>0.51)的患者,RDN 后 6 个月 24 小时收缩压无变化(-0.4±12.3mmHg,P>0.05),而 AASI 低于 0.51 则与明显降低相关(-9.3±11.0mmHg,P<0.01)。在 AASI 四分位数中,AASI 最高四分位数(AASI≥0.60)的患者肌肉交感神经活动低于其他三分位数(39±13 与 49±13 次/分钟,P=0.035)。以 24 小时收缩压降低至少 5%定义的反应率,在最低 AASI 四分位数(<0.45)为 58%,在最高四分位数(≥0.60)为 16%。在校正年龄、性别、BMI、诊室和 24 小时收缩压后,AASI 低于 0.51 可预测 RDN 反应(比值比 3.46,P=0.04)。

结论

我们的结论是,在抗药性高血压患者中,较低的 AASI 是 RDN 血压反应的独立预测因素,这可能是由于其血压升高的神经贡献而非生物力学贡献更为明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验