Suppr超能文献

尊严和协助死亡的利益相关者观点的系统评价。

A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives of Dignity and Assisted Dying.

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (E.L.Y.Q, K.Z.Y.C, J.K.L., D.W.J.W., C.S.C., Y.X.L., L.K), National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (E.L.Y.Q, K.Z.Y.C, J.K.L., D.W.J.W., C.S.C., Y.X.L., L.K), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (L.K), National Cancer Centre Singapore Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (L.K), National Cancer Centre Singapore (L.K), Singapore; Palliative Care Institute Liverpool (L.K), Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Health Data Science (L.K), Liverpool; Duke-NUS Medical School (L.K), Singapore; Centre of Biomedical Ethics (L.K), Singapore; PalC (L.K), The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Dover Park Hospice, Singapore.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Feb;65(2):e123-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The debate on assisted dying and its components, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has evolved with the emergence of the right to dignity and the wish to hasten death (WTHD). Whilst shaped by local legal and sociocultural considerations, appreciation of how patients, healthcare professionals and lawmakers relate notions of dignity to self-concepts of personhood and the desire for assisted dying will better inform and direct support of patients.

METHODS

Guided by the Systematic Evidence Based Approach, a systematic scoping review (SSR in SEBA) on perspectives of dignity, WTHD and personhood featured in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Scopus databases and four key Palliative Care journals was conducted. The review hinged on the following questions: "what is the relationship between dignity and the wish to hasten death (WTHD) in the assisted dying debate?", "how is dignity conceptualised by patients with WTHD?" and "what are prevailing perspectives on the role of assisted dying in maintaining a dying patient's dignity?"

RESULTS

6947 abstracts were identified, 663 full text articles reviewed, and 88 articles included. The four domains identified include 1) concepts of dignity through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) including their various definitions and descriptions; 2) the relationship between dignity, WTHD and assisted dying with loss of dignity and autonomy foregrounded; 3) stakeholder perspectives for and against assisted dying including those of patient, healthcare provider and lawmaker; and 4) other dignity-conserving measures as alternatives to assisted dying.

CONCLUSION

Concepts of dignity constantly evolve throughout the patient's end of life journey. Understanding when and how these concepts of personhood change and trigger the fear of a loss of dignity or intractable suffering could direct timely, individualised and appropriate person-centred dignity conserving measures. We believe an RToP-based tool could fulfil this role and further study into the design of this tool is planned.

摘要

简介

关于协助死亡及其组成部分(安乐死和医师协助自杀)的争论随着尊严权利和加速死亡的意愿(WTHD)的出现而发展。虽然受到当地法律和社会文化因素的影响,但了解患者、医疗保健专业人员和立法者如何将尊严概念与个人概念和协助死亡的愿望联系起来,将更好地为患者提供信息和指导。

方法

在系统循证方法(SEBA 中的 SSR)的指导下,对 PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、CINAHL、Scopus 数据库和 4 种主要的姑息治疗期刊中关于尊严、WTHD 和人格的观点进行了系统的范围综述。审查主要基于以下问题:“在协助死亡辩论中,尊严与加速死亡的意愿(WTHD)之间有什么关系?”“有 WTHD 的患者如何理解尊严?”和“对于协助死亡在维持临终患者尊严方面的作用,存在哪些主要观点?”

结果

确定了 6947 个摘要,审查了 663 篇全文文章,并纳入了 88 篇文章。确定的四个领域包括 1)通过人格的环理论(RToP)的镜头来理解尊严概念,包括它们的各种定义和描述;2)尊严、WTHD 和协助死亡之间的关系,突出了尊严和自主权的丧失;3)患者、医疗保健提供者和立法者支持和反对协助死亡的观点;4)其他尊严保护措施作为协助死亡的替代方案。

结论

尊严的概念在患者生命末期的整个过程中不断演变。了解这些人格概念何时以及如何变化并引发对尊严丧失或无法忍受的痛苦的恐惧,可以指导及时、个性化和适当的以人为本的尊严保护措施。我们相信,基于 RToP 的工具可以发挥这一作用,并且计划进一步研究该工具的设计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验