Ma Tao, Zhang Shuai, Huang Dongmei, Zhang Gang, Chen Boyi, Zhang Ning
Tao Ma, Department of General Surgery, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China.
Shuai Zhang, Department of General Surgery, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China.
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Sep-Oct;38(7):1905-1910. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.7.5826.
To compare the therapeutic effect of endoscopic-assisted lateral neck dissection and open lateral neck dissection in the treatment of lateral neck lymph node metastasis of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
A retrospective analysis was carried out focusing on the general clinical data of 86 patients with PTC treated Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from January 2020 to September 2021. According to different surgical methods, enrolled patients were divided into the endoscopic surgery group (n = 34) and the open surgery group (n = 52). Further comparison was performed on the operation indexes [operation time, postoperative length of stay in hospital, number of dissected lymph nodes (central area, lateral cervical area), number of metastatic lymph nodes (central area, lateral cervical area), hospitalization cost], postoperative complications, postoperative neck pain, neck numbness discomfort score, and satisfaction with postoperative cosmetic effect.
The operation time and hospitalization cost of the endoscopic surgery group were higher than those of the open surgery group, and the intraoperative blood loss was lower than that of the open surgery group, with statistically significant differences (0.05). There was no significant difference in the length of stay in the hospital, the number of dissected lymph nodes, the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the detection rate of lymph nodes in zone II between the two groups (0.05). Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups, which was lower in the endoscopic surgery group (29.4%) than that in the open surgery group (51.9%) (0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative neck pain scores between the two groups (0.05). While the postoperative neck numbness discomfort score, and satisfaction score with postoperative cosmetic effect in the endoscopic surgery group were better than those in the open surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant (0.05).
Endoscopic-assisted lateral neck dissection can reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complication incidence in the treatment of lateral neck lymph node metastasis of PTC. However, it has the disadvantages of longer operation time and high hospitalization costs.
比较内镜辅助下侧颈清扫术与开放性侧颈清扫术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者侧颈淋巴结转移的疗效。
回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年9月在保定市第一中心医院接受治疗的86例PTC患者的一般临床资料。根据手术方式不同,将纳入患者分为内镜手术组(n = 34)和开放手术组(n = 52)。进一步比较两组的手术指标[手术时间、术后住院时间、清扫淋巴结数量(中央区、侧颈区)、转移淋巴结数量(中央区、侧颈区)、住院费用]、术后并发症、术后颈部疼痛、颈部麻木不适评分以及对术后美容效果的满意度。
内镜手术组的手术时间和住院费用高于开放手术组,术中出血量低于开放手术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的住院时间、清扫淋巴结数量、转移淋巴结数量及Ⅱ区淋巴结检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义,内镜手术组(29.4%)低于开放手术组(51.9%)(P<0.05)。两组术后颈部疼痛评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。内镜手术组术后颈部麻木不适评分及对术后美容效果的满意度评分均优于开放手术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
内镜辅助下侧颈清扫术治疗PTC侧颈淋巴结转移可减少术中出血量及术后并发症发生率。然而,其存在手术时间较长和住院费用较高的缺点。