• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境态度对行为的影响完全由未观察到的异质性驱动吗?

Is the Effect of Environmental Attitudes on Behavior Driven Solely by Unobserved Heterogeneity?

作者信息

Andersen Henrik Kenneth, Mayerl Jochen

机构信息

Institute of Sociology, Chemnitz University of Technology, Thüringer Weg 9, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany.

出版信息

Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2022;74(3):381-408. doi: 10.1007/s11577-022-00855-2. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11577-022-00855-2
PMID:36247221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9542465/
Abstract

A large body of research exists investigating the link between environmental attitudes and behavior. Many empirical studies have found modest positive effects, suggesting that attitudes toward the environment might indeed influence environmental behavior. However, most of the previous empirical work is cross-sectional and correlational in nature. This means that the issue of the causal effect of environmental attitudes on behavior is far from settled, and that the relationships observed in the past may be due to unobserved confounders. In a panel study using six waves of the GESIS Panel Survey, we examine the individual-level effect of changes in one's attitudes on changes in different forms of environmental behavior. We use fixed effects panel regression within the structural equation modeling framework to control for unobserved time-invariant confounders, while also tackling other methodological challenges. We find that environmental attitudes have no effect on behavior after controlling for unobserved confounders. However, there is a robust effect of attitudes on willingness to sacrifice. This suggests that creating more positive attitudes might make individuals more willing to accept sacrifices for environmental protection.

摘要

存在大量研究探讨环境态度与行为之间的联系。许多实证研究发现了适度的积极影响,这表明对环境的态度可能确实会影响环境行为。然而,之前的大多数实证研究本质上都是横断面研究且具有相关性。这意味着环境态度对行为的因果效应问题远未解决,过去观察到的关系可能是由于未观察到的混杂因素。在一项使用德国社会经济面板调查(GESIS Panel Survey)六期数据的面板研究中,我们考察了个人态度变化对不同形式环境行为变化的个体层面影响。我们在结构方程建模框架内使用固定效应面板回归来控制未观察到的时间不变混杂因素,同时也应对其他方法上的挑战。我们发现,在控制了未观察到的混杂因素后,环境态度对行为没有影响。然而,态度对牺牲意愿有显著影响。这表明营造更积极的态度可能会使个人更愿意为环境保护接受牺牲。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/2e73965249e4/11577_2022_855_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/455ec95eea59/11577_2022_855_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/8c670b3aee5b/11577_2022_855_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/6ef3bf823031/11577_2022_855_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/2e73965249e4/11577_2022_855_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/455ec95eea59/11577_2022_855_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/8c670b3aee5b/11577_2022_855_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/6ef3bf823031/11577_2022_855_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab04/9542465/2e73965249e4/11577_2022_855_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the Effect of Environmental Attitudes on Behavior Driven Solely by Unobserved Heterogeneity?环境态度对行为的影响完全由未观察到的异质性驱动吗?
Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2022;74(3):381-408. doi: 10.1007/s11577-022-00855-2. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the willingness to sacrifice for the environment: The Austrian case.新冠疫情对为环境做出牺牲意愿的影响:奥地利案例
OZS Osterr Z Soziol. 2021;46(4):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s11614-021-00464-x. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
3
Equivalent approaches to dealing with unobserved heterogeneity in cross-lagged panel models? Investigating the benefits and drawbacks of the latent curve model with structured residuals and the random intercept cross-lagged panel model.交叉滞后面板模型中处理未观测异质性的等效方法? 研究具有结构残差的潜在曲线模型和随机截距交叉滞后面板模型的优缺点。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Oct;27(5):730-751. doi: 10.1037/met0000285. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
4
Do time-invariant confounders explain away the association between job stress and workers' mental health? Evidence from Japanese occupational panel data.时不变混杂因素能否解释工作压力与工人心理健康之间的关联?来自日本职业面板数据的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.021. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
5
Estimating causal effects from family planning health communication campaigns using panel data: the "your health, your wealth" campaign in Egypt.利用面板数据估计计划生育健康传播活动的因果效应:埃及的“你的健康,你的财富”运动。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046138. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
6
Socioeconomic inequality in health in the British household panel: Tests of the social causation, health selection and the indirect selection hypothesis using dynamic fixed effects panel models.英国家庭调查中健康方面的社会经济不平等:使用动态固定效应面板模型对社会因果关系、健康选择和间接选择假设的检验
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:172-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.021. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
People's attitude towards willingness-to-pay for environmental protection in Pakistan.巴基斯坦人民对环境保护支付意愿的态度。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):52635-52654. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18177-9. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
Financial circumstances, mastery, and mental health: Taking unobserved time-stable influences into account.财务状况、掌控感与心理健康:考虑到未被观察到的时间稳定影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Apr;202:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
9
Cognitive Inflexibility Predicts Extremist Attitudes.认知僵化预示着极端主义态度。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 7;10:989. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00989. eCollection 2019.
10
Pros and cons factors influence population attitudes toward non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination during post-COVID-19.在后 COVID-19 时期,影响民众对非药物干预措施和疫苗接种态度的正反两方面因素。
Public Health. 2022 Oct;211:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the willingness to sacrifice for the environment: The Austrian case.新冠疫情对为环境做出牺牲意愿的影响:奥地利案例
OZS Osterr Z Soziol. 2021;46(4):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s11614-021-00464-x. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
2
Relationships Between Identity, Well-Being, and Willingness to Sacrifice in Personal and Collective Favorite Places: The Mediating Role of Well-Being.个人及集体喜爱之地中身份认同、幸福感与牺牲意愿之间的关系:幸福感的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 7;11:151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00151. eCollection 2020.
3
Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures.
检验有序分类测量数据的纵向测量不变性。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):486-506. doi: 10.1037/met0000075. Epub 2016 May 23.
4
Optimal time lags in panel studies.面板研究中的最佳时滞。
Psychol Methods. 2015 Dec;20(4):489-505. doi: 10.1037/met0000041. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
5
A GENERAL PANEL MODEL WITH RANDOM AND FIXED EFFECTS: A STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS APPROACH.具有随机效应和固定效应的一般面板模型:一种结构方程方法。
Soc Forces. 2010 Sep;89(1):1-34. doi: 10.1353/sof.2010.0072.
6
Are the affluent prepared to pay for the planet? Explaining willingness to pay for public and quasi-private environmental goods in Switzerland.富人愿意为地球买单吗?解读瑞士民众为公共及准公共环境产品付费的意愿。
Popul Environ. 2010 Sep;32(1):42-65. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0116-y. Epub 2010 Jul 9.