Daley Ryan T, Cunningham Tony J, Kensinger Elizabeth A
Department of Psychology, Gordon College, Wenham, MA, United States.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 30;13:974933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974933. eCollection 2022.
The COVID-19 pandemic provided the opportunity to determine whether age-related differences in utilitarian moral decision-making during sacrificial moral dilemmas extend to non-sacrificial dilemmas in real-world settings. As affect and emotional memory are associated with moral and prosocial behaviors, we also sought to understand how these were associated with moral behaviors during the 2020 spring phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Older age, higher negative affect, and greater reports of reflecting on negative aspects of the pandemic were associated with higher reported purchase of hard-to-find goods, while older age and higher negative affect alone were associated with higher reported purchase of hard-to-find medical supplies. Older age was associated with what appeared at first to be non-utilitarian moral behaviors with regard to the purchasing of these supplies; However, they also reported distributing these goods to family members rather than engaging in hoarding behaviors. These findings suggest that advancing age may be associated with engagement in utilitarian moral decision-making in real-world settings more than the sacrificial moral decision-making literature would suggest.
新冠疫情提供了一个机会,来确定在牺牲性道德困境中功利主义道德决策的年龄差异是否会延伸到现实世界背景下的非牺牲性困境。由于情感和情绪记忆与道德及亲社会行为相关,我们还试图了解在2020年美国新冠疫情春季阶段,这些因素是如何与道德行为相关联的。年龄较大、消极情绪较高以及更多关于反思疫情负面影响的报告与购买难寻商品的较高报告率相关,而仅年龄较大和消极情绪较高与购买难寻医疗用品的较高报告率相关。年龄较大与购买这些用品时最初看似非功利主义的道德行为相关;然而,他们也报告说将这些商品分发给家庭成员,而不是进行囤积行为。这些发现表明,在现实世界背景下,年龄增长可能与功利主义道德决策的参与度相关,这比牺牲性道德决策文献所表明的情况更为明显。