Davison M, McCarthy D
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):97-116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-97.
Six pigeons were trained in a discrete-trials signal-detection procedure to discriminate between a fixed-duration stimulus (5 s or 20 s) and a set of variable durations ranging from 2.5 s to 57.5 s in steps of 5 s. For each fixed-duration stimulus, the ratio of reinforcer frequencies contingent upon reporting the fixed versus the variable stimulus was systematically manipulated. Detection performance was well controlled by both the stimulus value and the reinforcer ratio. Both the discriminability between the fixed duration and the set of variable durations, and the discriminability between the fixed duration and each of the variable durations, were independent of the reinforcer-frequency ratio when discriminability was measured as log d. The sensitivity of response bias to reinforcement-ratio changes was independent of the value of the fixed duration, but was not independent of the discriminability of the variable durations from the fixed durations. Under current models, discriminability measures in complex temporal discrimination may be independent of biasing manipulations, but bias measures are not independent of stimulus values.
六只鸽子接受了离散试验信号检测程序的训练,以区分固定时长的刺激(5秒或20秒)和一组时长从2.5秒到57.5秒、步长为5秒的可变时长刺激。对于每个固定时长的刺激,根据报告固定刺激与可变刺激而给予强化物的频率比被系统地操纵。检测性能受到刺激值和强化物比率的良好控制。当以log d衡量辨别力时,固定时长与可变时长组之间的辨别力,以及固定时长与每个可变时长之间的辨别力,均与强化物频率比无关。反应偏差对强化物比率变化的敏感性与固定时长的值无关,但与可变时长与固定时长的辨别力有关。在当前模型下,表示复杂时间辨别中辨别力的指标可能与偏差操纵无关,但偏差指标与刺激值有关。