Suppr超能文献

象似性和约定俗成性对语序偏好的影响。

The Effects of Iconicity and Conventionalization on Word Order Preferences.

机构信息

Centre for Language Evolution, The University of Edinburgh.

Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2022 Oct;46(10):e13203. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13203.

Abstract

Of the six possible orderings of the three main constituents of language (subject, verb, and object), two-SOV and SVO-are predominant cross-linguistically. Previous research using the silent gesture paradigm in which hearing participants produce or respond to gestures without speech has shown that different factors such as reversibility, salience, and animacy can affect the preferences for different orders. Here, we test whether participants' preferences for orders that are conditioned on the semantics of the event change depending on (i) the iconicity of individual gestural elements and (ii) the prior knowledge of a conventional lexicon. Our findings demonstrate the same preference for semantically conditioned word order found in previous studies, specifically that SOV and SVO are preferred differentially for different types of events. We do not find that iconicity of individual gestures affects participants' ordering preferences; however, we do find that learning a lexicon leads to a stronger preference for SVO-like orders overall. Finally, we compare our findings from English speakers, using an SVO-dominant language, with data from speakers of an SOV-dominant language, Turkish. We find that, while learning a lexicon leads to an increase in SVO preference for both sets of participants, this effect is mediated by language background and event type, suggesting that an interplay of factors together determines preferences for different ordering patterns. Taken together, our results support a view of word order as a gradient phenomenon responding to multiple biases.

摘要

在语言的三个主要成分(主语、动词和宾语)的六种可能顺序中,两种语序,即 SO 语序和 VO 语序,在跨语言中占主导地位。先前使用无声手势范式的研究表明,不同的因素,如可逆性、显著性和能动性,可以影响不同顺序的偏好。在这里,我们测试了参与者对受事件语义条件制约的顺序的偏好是否会因以下因素而改变:(i)个体手势元素的象似性;(ii)对传统词汇的先验知识。我们的发现表明,与先前的研究相同,即对受语义条件制约的词序存在偏好,特别是 SO 语序和 VO 语序对不同类型的事件有不同的偏好。我们没有发现个体手势的象似性会影响参与者的排序偏好;然而,我们确实发现,学习词汇会导致对整体上更类似于 VO 语序的偏好。最后,我们将来自以 VO 语序为主导的语言的英语使用者的发现与以 SO 语序为主导的语言的土耳其语使用者的数据进行了比较。我们发现,虽然学习词汇会导致两组参与者对 VO 语序的偏好增加,但这种影响受到语言背景和事件类型的调节,这表明多种因素的相互作用共同决定了对不同排序模式的偏好。总之,我们的研究结果支持了一种观点,即词序是一种对多种偏向做出反应的渐变现象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac8b/9787421/1c24dab10c13/COGS-46-e13203-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effects of Iconicity and Conventionalization on Word Order Preferences.
Cogn Sci. 2022 Oct;46(10):e13203. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13203.
2
From improvisation to learning: How naturalness and systematicity shape language evolution.
Cognition. 2022 Nov;228:105206. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105206. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
3
Cross-linguistic gestures reflect typological universals: a subject-initial, verb-final bias in speakers of diverse languages.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.022. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
4
When Cars Hit Trucks and Girls Hug Boys: The Effect of Animacy on Word Order in Gestural Language Creation.
Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):918-938. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12555. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
A new perspective on word order preferences: the availability of a lexicon triggers the use of SVO word order.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 13;6:1183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01183. eCollection 2015.
7
A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1079-88. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463705. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
The semantic origins of word order.
Cognition. 2014 Jun;131(3):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
Investigating constituent order change with elicited pantomime: a functional account of SVO emergence.
Cogn Sci. 2014 Jun;38(5):943-72. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12105. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
10
Does language shape silent gesture?
Cognition. 2016 Mar;148:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

1
From improvisation to learning: How naturalness and systematicity shape language evolution.
Cognition. 2022 Nov;228:105206. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105206. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Optimality of syntactic dependency distances.
Phys Rev E. 2022 Jan;105(1-1):014308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.014308.
3
Multimodality and the origin of a novel communication system in face-to-face interaction.
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jan 15;7(1):182056. doi: 10.1098/rsos.182056. eCollection 2020 Jan.
4
The role of iconicity and simultaneity for efficient communication: The case of Italian Sign Language (LIS).
Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104246. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104246. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
Evolving artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic sign.
Cognition. 2019 Nov;192:103964. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Cognitive mechanisms for inferring the meaning of novel signals during symbolisation.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16;13(1):e0189540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189540. eCollection 2018.
9
Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000235. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验