Lockwood Gwilym, Dingemanse Mark, Hagoort Peter
Neurobiology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Language and Cognition Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000235. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
The existence of sound-symbolism (or a non-arbitrary link between form and meaning) is well-attested. However, sound-symbolism has mostly been investigated with nonwords in forced choice tasks, neither of which are representative of natural language. This study uses ideophones, which are naturally occurring sound-symbolic words that depict sensory information, to investigate how sensitive Dutch speakers are to sound-symbolism in Japanese in a learning task. Participants were taught 2 sets of Japanese ideophones; 1 set with the ideophones' real meanings in Dutch, the other set with their opposite meanings. In Experiment 1, participants learned the ideophones and their real meanings much better than the ideophones with their opposite meanings. Moreover, despite the learning rounds, participants were still able to guess the real meanings of the ideophones in a 2-alternative forced-choice test after they were informed of the manipulation. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is robust beyond 2-alternative forced-choice paradigms and affects broader language processes such as word learning. In Experiment 2, participants learned regular Japanese adjectives with the same manipulation, and there was no difference between real and opposite conditions. This shows that natural language sound-symbolism is especially strong in ideophones, and that people learn words better when form and meaning match. The highlights of this study are as follows: (a) Dutch speakers learn real meanings of Japanese ideophones better than opposite meanings, (b) Dutch speakers accurately guess meanings of Japanese ideophones, (c) this sensitivity happens despite learning some opposite pairings, (d) no such learning effect exists for regular Japanese adjectives, and (e) this shows the importance of sound-symbolism in scaffolding language learning. (PsycINFO Database Record
语音象征(即形式与意义之间的非任意性联系)的存在已得到充分证实。然而,语音象征大多是在强制选择任务中通过非词进行研究的,这两者都不能代表自然语言。本研究使用拟声词,即自然出现的描绘感官信息的语音象征词,来调查荷兰语使用者在学习任务中对日语语音象征的敏感程度。参与者学习了两组日语拟声词;一组的拟声词在荷兰语中的意思是真实的,另一组的意思则相反。在实验1中,参与者学习拟声词及其真实含义的效果比学习含义相反的拟声词要好得多。此外,尽管经过了学习环节,但在被告知这种操作后,参与者在二选一的强制选择测试中仍然能够猜出拟声词的真实含义。这表明自然语言的语音象征在二选一的强制选择范式之外依然稳固,并会影响诸如词汇学习等更广泛的语言过程。在实验2中,参与者以同样的操作学习了常规的日语形容词,真实条件和相反条件之间没有差异。这表明自然语言的语音象征在拟声词中尤为强烈,而且当形式与意义匹配时,人们学习单词的效果更好。本研究的要点如下:(a)荷兰语使用者学习日语拟声词的真实含义比学习相反含义的效果更好;(b)荷兰语使用者能准确猜出日语拟声词的含义;(c)尽管学习了一些相反的配对,但这种敏感性依然存在;(d)常规日语形容词不存在这种学习效果;(e)这表明语音象征在支撑语言学习方面的重要性。(PsycINFO数据库记录)