ME-NBI combined with endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing and staging the invasion depth of early esophageal cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Several methods can assist in detecting early esophageal cancer (EEC) and staging esophageal cancer (EC) invasion depth.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) plus endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for diagnosing EC.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for relevant studies. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QADAS2) was used to assess the studies' methodological quality. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood (LR+), negative likelihood (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. The meta-analysis suggested that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR of ME-NBI plus EUS for diagnosing EC were 0.947 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.901-0.975), 0.894 (95% CI, 0.847-0.931), 7.989 (95% CI, 4.264-14.970), 0.066 (95% CI, 0.035-0.124), and 137.96 (95% CI, 60.369-315.27), respectively. Those values for staging the invasive depth were 0.791 (95% CI, 0.674-0.881), 0.943 (95% CI, 0.906-0.968), 13.087 (95% CI, 7.559-22.657), 0.226 (95% CI, 0.142-0.360), and 61.332 (95% CI, 27.343-137.57). The areas under the curves (AUCs) for diagnosis and staging were 0.97 and 0.95, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ME-NBI plus EUS might be an adequate diagnostic and staging modality for EC. Due to the study limitations, more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of ME-NBI plus EUS.