Department of Gastroenterology Center, The No. 1 People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng 224000, China.
Department of Cardiology, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Huai'an 223001, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 20;2018:8591387. doi: 10.1155/2018/8591387. eCollection 2018.
This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) and determine its value for invasion depth staging in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and found relevant studies published up to December 2016. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values from forest plots and determined summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves for ME-NBI diagnostic accuracy analysis.
Ten studies met our criteria and were selected for this meta-analysis. A total of 1,033 patients underwent ME-NBI, and 207 of these patients received a diagnosis of staging mucosal or submucosal invasion. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values of ME-NBI for the diagnostic rate were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-0.95), 6.74 (95% CI, 3.52-712.89), and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.42), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.95 for all studies.
ME-NBI provides a high diagnostic rate in evaluating the esophagus to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma. In the differentiation for invasion depth staging, ME-NBI was demonstrated to be superior to white light endoscopy and had a similar diagnostic rate compared with HF-EUS. However, HF-EUS had high positive likelihood values for invasion depth staging, suggesting that HF-EUS is a reliable method for confirming invasion depth staging.
本研究旨在探讨放大内镜窄带成像(ME-NBI)的诊断准确性,并确定其在食管鳞状细胞癌浸润深度分期中的价值。
我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,查找截至 2016 年 12 月发表的相关研究。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具 2(QUADAS-2)评估研究质量。我们从森林图中计算了 ME-NBI 诊断准确性分析的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比,并确定了汇总受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线。
符合标准的研究共有 10 项,纳入本 meta 分析。共有 1033 例患者接受了 ME-NBI 检查,其中 207 例患者被诊断为黏膜或黏膜下浸润分期。ME-NBI 对诊断率的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比的合并值分别为 0.90(95%CI,0.71-0.97)、0.90(95%CI,0.80-0.95)、6.74(95%CI,3.52-712.89)和 0.20(95%CI,0.10-0.42)。所有研究的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.95。
ME-NBI 对评估食管鳞癌具有较高的诊断率。在浸润深度分期的鉴别中,ME-NBI 优于白光内镜,与高频超声内镜(HF-EUS)的诊断率相当。然而,HF-EUS 对浸润深度分期的阳性似然值较高,提示 HF-EUS 是一种可靠的浸润深度分期确认方法。