• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放大内镜窄带成像技术对食管鳞癌浸润深度诊断准确性的系统评价和 Meta 分析。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow Band Imaging and Its Diagnostic Value for Invasion Depth Staging in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology Center, The No. 1 People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng 224000, China.

Department of Cardiology, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Huai'an 223001, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 20;2018:8591387. doi: 10.1155/2018/8591387. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/8591387
PMID:29888281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5985084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) and determine its value for invasion depth staging in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and found relevant studies published up to December 2016. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values from forest plots and determined summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves for ME-NBI diagnostic accuracy analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies met our criteria and were selected for this meta-analysis. A total of 1,033 patients underwent ME-NBI, and 207 of these patients received a diagnosis of staging mucosal or submucosal invasion. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values of ME-NBI for the diagnostic rate were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-0.95), 6.74 (95% CI, 3.52-712.89), and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.42), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.95 for all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

ME-NBI provides a high diagnostic rate in evaluating the esophagus to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma. In the differentiation for invasion depth staging, ME-NBI was demonstrated to be superior to white light endoscopy and had a similar diagnostic rate compared with HF-EUS. However, HF-EUS had high positive likelihood values for invasion depth staging, suggesting that HF-EUS is a reliable method for confirming invasion depth staging.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在探讨放大内镜窄带成像(ME-NBI)的诊断准确性,并确定其在食管鳞状细胞癌浸润深度分期中的价值。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,查找截至 2016 年 12 月发表的相关研究。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具 2(QUADAS-2)评估研究质量。我们从森林图中计算了 ME-NBI 诊断准确性分析的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比,并确定了汇总受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线。

结果

符合标准的研究共有 10 项,纳入本 meta 分析。共有 1033 例患者接受了 ME-NBI 检查,其中 207 例患者被诊断为黏膜或黏膜下浸润分期。ME-NBI 对诊断率的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比的合并值分别为 0.90(95%CI,0.71-0.97)、0.90(95%CI,0.80-0.95)、6.74(95%CI,3.52-712.89)和 0.20(95%CI,0.10-0.42)。所有研究的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.95。

结论

ME-NBI 对评估食管鳞癌具有较高的诊断率。在浸润深度分期的鉴别中,ME-NBI 优于白光内镜,与高频超声内镜(HF-EUS)的诊断率相当。然而,HF-EUS 对浸润深度分期的阳性似然值较高,提示 HF-EUS 是一种可靠的浸润深度分期确认方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/613665629188/BMRI2018-8591387.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/657c10990fa6/BMRI2018-8591387.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/78bdc7f9e531/BMRI2018-8591387.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/34135b0b62bc/BMRI2018-8591387.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/d3670e00a21c/BMRI2018-8591387.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/4e73ae4539a9/BMRI2018-8591387.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/13f45bf974fe/BMRI2018-8591387.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/613665629188/BMRI2018-8591387.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/657c10990fa6/BMRI2018-8591387.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/78bdc7f9e531/BMRI2018-8591387.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/34135b0b62bc/BMRI2018-8591387.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/d3670e00a21c/BMRI2018-8591387.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/4e73ae4539a9/BMRI2018-8591387.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/13f45bf974fe/BMRI2018-8591387.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfa/5985084/613665629188/BMRI2018-8591387.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow Band Imaging and Its Diagnostic Value for Invasion Depth Staging in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.放大内镜窄带成像技术对食管鳞癌浸润深度诊断准确性的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 20;2018:8591387. doi: 10.1155/2018/8591387. eCollection 2018.
2
Endoscopic imaging modalities for diagnosing the invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.内镜成像方式诊断食管浅表鳞状细胞癌浸润深度的系统评价。
Esophagus. 2022 Jul;19(3):375-383. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00918-5. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.经腹超声和内镜超声用于胆囊息肉的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012233.pub2.
5
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 诊断的胸部影像学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5.
6
Efficacy of shear wave elastography in measuring placental stiffness for pre-eclampsia screening and diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.剪切波弹性成像测量胎盘硬度用于子痫前期筛查和诊断的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70293.
7
Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.双功能超声用于诊断颅外段有症状颈动脉狭窄。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 11;7(7):CD013172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2.
8
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
9
Diagnostic performance of NBI in post-treatment follow up for laryngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.窄带成像技术在喉癌治疗后随访中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Sep-Oct;43(5):103530. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103530. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
10
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing risk factors and constructing a predictive model for superficial esophageal carcinoma with submucosal infiltration exceeding 200 micrometers.分析黏膜下浸润超过 200 微米的表浅食管癌的危险因素并构建预测模型。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 6;24(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03442-1.
2
Unified Magnifying Endoscopic Classification (UMEC) of Gastrointestinal Lesions: A North American Validation Study.胃肠道病变的统一放大内镜分类(UMEC):一项北美验证研究。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 9;7(3):246-254. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad055. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Advanced Imaging in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Literature Review of the Current State of the Art.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of the invasion depth of superficial squamous cell carcinoma based on microvessel morphology: magnifying endoscopic classification of the Japan Esophageal Society.基于微血管形态预测浅表性鳞状细胞癌浸润深度:日本食管学会放大内镜分类法
Esophagus. 2017;14(2):105-112. doi: 10.1007/s10388-016-0527-7. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
2
Simplified criteria for diagnosing superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms using Narrow Band Imaging magnifying endoscopy.使用窄带成像放大内镜诊断浅表性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤的简化标准。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 7;22(41):9196-9204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i41.9196.
3
Narrow-Band Imaging Magnifying Endoscopy versus Lugol Chromoendoscopy with Pink-Color Sign Assessment in the Diagnosis of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Neoplasms: A Randomised Noninferiority Trial.
胃肠道内镜检查中的先进成像技术:当前技术水平的文献综述
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 4;30(3):175-191. doi: 10.1159/000527083. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
ME-NBI combined with endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing and staging the invasion depth of early esophageal cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis.ME-NBI 联合内镜超声检查诊断和分期早期食管癌侵犯深度:一项诊断性荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 17;20(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02809-6.
5
Convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer based on endoscopic images: A meta-analysis.基于卷积神经网络的内镜图像早期食管癌人工智能诊断:一项荟萃分析。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep-Oct;28(5):332-340. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_178_22.
6
Efficacy of thoracotomy and thoracoscopic-assisted esophageal surgery in conversion and salvage surgeries: a retrospective study.开胸术和胸腔镜辅助食管手术在转化和挽救手术中的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 May 23;20(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02637-8.
7
Unified magnifying endoscopic classification for esophageal, gastric and colonic lesions: a feasibility pilot study.食管、胃和结肠病变的统一放大内镜分类:一项可行性初步研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Aug 16;9(9):E1306-E1314. doi: 10.1055/a-1499-6638. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Controversies in EUS: Do we need miniprobes?超声内镜的争议:我们需要微型探头吗?
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Jul-Aug;10(4):246-269. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00252.
9
Systematic Review on Optical Diagnosis of Early Gastrointestinal Neoplasia.早期胃肠道肿瘤光学诊断的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 25;10(13):2794. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132794.
10
Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Superficial Esophageal Cancer Using a Pattern Recognition Neural Network.使用模式识别神经网络预测浅表性食管癌的淋巴结转移
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Nov 27;12:12249-12258. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S270316. eCollection 2020.
窄带成像放大内镜与卢戈氏染色内镜联合粉红色征评估在浅表性食管鳞状肿瘤诊断中的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:639462. doi: 10.1155/2015/639462. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
Multicenter, prospective trial of white-light imaging alone versus white-light imaging followed by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for the real-time imaging and diagnosis of invasion depth in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.多中心前瞻性试验:单纯白光成像与白光成像后联合窄带成像放大内镜用于浅表性食管鳞状细胞癌浸润深度的实时成像与诊断
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1355-1361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Endoscopic optical diagnosis provides high diagnostic accuracy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜光学诊断对食管鳞状细胞癌具有较高的诊断准确性。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 9;14:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-141.
6
Predicting the invasion depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnifying endoscopy.预测食管鳞状细胞癌的浸润深度:内镜超声检查与放大内镜检查的比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):853-61. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.915052. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
7
Randomized study of two endo-knives for endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal cancer.随机研究两种内镜下黏膜剥离术用的内刀在食管癌内镜治疗中的应用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1293-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.161. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
Narrow band imaging with magnification can pick up esophageal squamous cell carcinoma more efficiently than lugol chromoendoscopy in patients after chemoradiotherapy.对于接受放化疗后的患者,放大窄带成像比卢戈氏染色内镜检查能更有效地检测出食管鳞状细胞癌。
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:256439. doi: 10.1155/2013/256439. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating mucosal versus submucosal invasion of superficial esophageal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声内镜诊断早期食管癌黏膜下浸润的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):242-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
10
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.QUADAS-2:用于诊断准确性研究质量评估的修订工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.