• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织火星任务:航天多团队系统中工作的任务管理视角。

Organizing for Mars: A Task Management Perspective on Work within Spaceflight Multiteam Systems.

机构信息

Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2023 Sep;65(6):1199-1220. doi: 10.1177/00187208221129939. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1177/00187208221129939
PMID:36255121
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine how task, social, and situational factors shape work patterns, information networks, and performance in spaceflight multiteam systems (MTSs).

BACKGROUND

Human factors research has explored the task and individual characteristics that affect decisions regarding when and in what order people complete tasks. We extend this work to understand how the social and situational factors that arise when working in MTSs affect individual work patterns.

METHODS

We conducted a complex multi-site space analog simulation with NASA over the course of 3 years. The MTS task required participants from four teams (Geology, Robotics, Engineering, and Human Factors) to collaborate to design a well on Mars. We manipulated the one-way communication delay between the crew and mission support: no time lag, 60-second lag, and 180-second lag.

RESULTS

The study revealed that team and situational factors exert strong effects: members whose teams have less similar mental models, those whose teams prioritize their team goal over the MTS goal, and those working in social isolation and/or under communication delay engage longer on tasks. Time-on-task positively predicts MTS information networks, which in turn positively predict MTS performance when communication occurs with a delay, but not when it occurs in real-time.

CONCLUSION

Our findings contribute to research on task management in the context of working in teams and multiteam systems. Team and situational factors, along with task factors, shape task management behavior.

APPLICATION

Social and situational factors are important predictors of task management in team contexts such as spaceflight MTSs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察任务、社会和情境因素如何塑造航天多团队系统(MTS)中的工作模式、信息网络和绩效。

背景

人类因素研究已经探讨了影响人们何时以及按何种顺序完成任务的决策的任务和个体特征。我们将这项工作扩展到理解在 MTS 中工作时出现的社会和情境因素如何影响个人的工作模式。

方法

我们与美国国家航空航天局(NASA)合作进行了为期 3 年的复杂的多地点太空模拟实验。MTS 任务要求来自四个团队(地质、机器人、工程和人类因素)的参与者合作设计火星上的一口井。我们操纵了机组人员和任务支持之间的单向通信延迟:无时间延迟、60 秒延迟和 180 秒延迟。

结果

该研究表明,团队和情境因素具有很强的影响:团队心理模型相似度较低的成员、优先考虑团队目标而不是 MTS 目标的成员、以及在社会隔离和/或通信延迟下工作的成员,他们在任务上花费的时间更长。任务时间与 MTS 信息网络呈正相关,而当通信存在延迟时,信息网络又与 MTS 绩效呈正相关,而当通信实时进行时则不相关。

结论

我们的研究结果为团队环境中的任务管理研究做出了贡献。团队和情境因素与任务因素一起,塑造了任务管理行为。

应用

在航天 MTS 等团队环境中,社会和情境因素是任务管理的重要预测因素。

相似文献

1
Organizing for Mars: A Task Management Perspective on Work within Spaceflight Multiteam Systems.组织火星任务:航天多团队系统中工作的任务管理视角。
Hum Factors. 2023 Sep;65(6):1199-1220. doi: 10.1177/00187208221129939. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
2
Examining Multiteam Systems Across Context and Type: A Historiometric Analysis of Failed MTS Performance.跨情境与类型审视多团队系统:对失败的多团队系统绩效的历史计量分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:813624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813624. eCollection 2022.
3
Learning From the Past to Advance the Future: The Adaptation and Resilience of NASA's Spaceflight Multiteam Systems Across Four Eras of Spaceflight.借鉴历史,开创未来:美国国家航空航天局(NASA)航天多团队系统在四个航天时代的适应性与韧性
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01633. eCollection 2019.
4
Shared leadership in multiteam systems: how cockpit and cabin crews lead each other to safety.多团队系统中的共享领导:驾驶舱和客舱机组如何相互领导以确保安全。
Hum Factors. 2014 Mar;56(2):270-86. doi: 10.1177/0018720813488137.
5
Leadership in multiteam systems.多团队系统中的领导力。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Mar;91(2):311-29. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.311.
6
Health care for deep space explorers.深空探索者的医疗保健。
Ann ICRP. 2020 Dec;49(1_suppl):182-184. doi: 10.1177/0146645320935288. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
7
Multiteam Systems in Long Duration Exploration Missions: A Qualitative Analysis of Key Characteristics and Challenges.长期探索任务中的多团队系统:关键特征与挑战的定性分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:877509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877509. eCollection 2022.
8
Multi-team dynamics and distributed expertise in imission operations.介入手术操作中的多团队动态与分布式专业知识
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jun;76(6 Suppl):B145-53.
9
Bringing a Multiteam Systems Perspective to the Perioperative Context: Considerations for Future Research of Perioperative Handoffs.将多团队系统视角引入围手术期环境:围手术期交接班未来研究的考虑因素。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Aug;49(8):345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities.多团队系统中的团队合作:关键经验教训和未来机遇。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):390-406. doi: 10.1037/amp0000322.