• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期探索任务中的多团队系统:关键特征与挑战的定性分析

Multiteam Systems in Long Duration Exploration Missions: A Qualitative Analysis of Key Characteristics and Challenges.

作者信息

Verhoeven Dana C, Kramer William S, Shuffler Marissa L

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research and Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:877509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877509. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877509
PMID:36033091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9417619/
Abstract

Given the unprecedented environment of long duration space exploration (LDSE), success simply cannot occur without the coordinated efforts of multiple teams, both in flight and on the ground. These multiteam systems (MTSs) are needed to achieve the complex and dynamic tasks of spaceflight missions that will be longer and more uncertain than any previously experienced. Accordingly, research is limited in terms of how to best coordinate these teams and their dynamics-and in particular, how to best prepare LDSE teams to work across time and space effectively. To begin to address these critical questions systematically, qualitative data was extracted from a series of ten interviews with experts in spaceflight and long duration analog environments. Using thematic analysis techniques, we identified several consistent themes for affective, behavioral, and cognitive elements of teamwork occurring within and between teams. We examine each of these in detail, to identify the dynamics of what is currently known and where research needs to go to provide guidance for spaceflight organizations as well as others attempting to successfully implement MTSs in novel, complex environments.

摘要

鉴于长期太空探索(LDSE)的前所未有的环境,如果没有飞行中和地面上多个团队的协同努力,成功根本无法实现。这些多团队系统(MTS)是实现太空飞行任务复杂而动态的任务所必需的,这些任务将比以往任何经历都更长且更具不确定性。因此,关于如何最好地协调这些团队及其动态——特别是如何最好地让长期太空探索团队有效地跨越时间和空间开展工作的研究有限。为了开始系统地解决这些关键问题,我们从对航天和长期模拟环境专家进行的一系列十次访谈中提取了定性数据。使用主题分析技术,我们确定了团队内部和团队之间团队合作的情感、行为和认知要素的几个一致主题。我们详细研究其中每一个主题,以确定当前已知内容的动态以及研究需要朝着何处发展,从而为航天组织以及其他试图在新颖、复杂环境中成功实施多团队系统的组织提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4784/9417619/d8d16d6748cc/fpsyg-13-877509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4784/9417619/d8d16d6748cc/fpsyg-13-877509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4784/9417619/d8d16d6748cc/fpsyg-13-877509-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Multiteam Systems in Long Duration Exploration Missions: A Qualitative Analysis of Key Characteristics and Challenges.长期探索任务中的多团队系统:关键特征与挑战的定性分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 12;13:877509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877509. eCollection 2022.
2
Learning From the Past to Advance the Future: The Adaptation and Resilience of NASA's Spaceflight Multiteam Systems Across Four Eras of Spaceflight.借鉴历史,开创未来:美国国家航空航天局(NASA)航天多团队系统在四个航天时代的适应性与韧性
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01633. eCollection 2019.
3
Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities.多团队系统中的团队合作:关键经验教训和未来机遇。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):390-406. doi: 10.1037/amp0000322.
4
Team Self-Maintenance during Long-Duration Space Exploration: A Conceptual Framework.团队在长时间空间探索中的自我维持:概念框架。
Hum Factors. 2023 Sep;65(6):1251-1265. doi: 10.1177/00187208221076185. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
Examining Multiteam Systems Across Context and Type: A Historiometric Analysis of Failed MTS Performance.跨情境与类型审视多团队系统:对失败的多团队系统绩效的历史计量分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:813624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813624. eCollection 2022.
6
Organizing for Mars: A Task Management Perspective on Work within Spaceflight Multiteam Systems.组织火星任务:航天多团队系统中工作的任务管理视角。
Hum Factors. 2023 Sep;65(6):1199-1220. doi: 10.1177/00187208221129939. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
What We Know About Team Dynamics for Long-Distance Space Missions: A Systematic Review of Analog Research.我们对远程太空任务团队动态的了解:模拟研究的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2019 May 15;10:811. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00811. eCollection 2019.
9
Considerations for Multiteam Systems in Emergency Medical Services.多团队系统在紧急医疗服务中的考虑因素。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):150-153. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000213.
10
Teamwork and collaboration in long-duration space missions: Going to extremes.长时间太空任务中的团队合作:走向极端。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):563-575. doi: 10.1037/amp0000260.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness.行动后回顾(或汇报)的有效性及其影响因素的荟萃分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Jul;106(7):1007-1032. doi: 10.1037/apl0000821. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Teamwork and collaboration in long-duration space missions: Going to extremes.长时间太空任务中的团队合作:走向极端。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):563-575. doi: 10.1037/amp0000260.
3
Team composition and the ABCs of teamwork.团队构成和团队合作的 ABC 原则。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):349-362. doi: 10.1037/amp0000305.
4
Effects of isolation and confinement on humans-implications for manned space explorations.隔离和禁闭对人类的影响——对载人太空探索的启示
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Jun 15;120(12):1449-57. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00928.2015. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
Team-training in healthcare: a narrative synthesis of the literature.医疗保健领域的团队培训:文献的叙述性综合分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 May;23(5):359-72. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001848. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis.团队和个人汇报会提高绩效吗?一项荟萃分析。
Hum Factors. 2013 Feb;55(1):231-45. doi: 10.1177/0018720812448394.
7
Perspective: teams won't solve this problem.观点:团队无法解决这个问题。
Hum Factors. 2010 Apr;52(2):329-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720810374736.
8
The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis.有效团队合作的认知基础:一项荟萃分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):32-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017328.
9
Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.信息共享与团队绩效:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):535-46. doi: 10.1037/a0013773.
10
Teamwork in multiteam systems.多团队系统中的团队合作。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):964-71. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.964.