Suppr超能文献

失用症

Apraxia

作者信息

Gowda Supreeth N., Hodis Brendan, Kolton Schneider Lynne

机构信息

University of Kentucky

Boston University, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center

Abstract

Apraxia is the inability to perform skilled movements, whether they have been previously learned or can be immediately imitated by observing or carrying out the instructions of another individual. Diagnosis involves ruling out weakness, sensory dysfunction, comprehension deficits, or incoordination as potential causes. Initially, Hugo Karl Liepmann classified apraxia into 3 types—limb-kinetic, ideomotor, and ideational. Liepmann's descriptions laid the groundwork for today's characterizations. However, the concept of apraxia now comprises a broader spectrum of subtypes compared to those originally identified by Liepmann. Broadly, apraxia can be classified based on specific tasks performed or general actions taken. Unfortunately, the subtypes of apraxia are not defined consistently in the literature. Major forms of apraxia are listed below. General: Ideational: Loss of neural encoding of the concept of a previously known skill. Ideomotor: Impaired connection between the concept of a skill and its motor output. Limb-kinetic: Loss of the motor output associated with a given skill. Conceptual: Loss of ability to use tools: Task-specific: Speech. Specific constructional: Difficulty in drawing, constructing, or copying. The term "ideational apraxia" is sometimes alternatively used to describe the loss of the ability to perform a sequence of movements. In contrast, "conceptual apraxia" refers to the loss of the concept itself. However, a thorough discussion of usage differences is beyond the scope of this article. Praxis, or the ability to carry out skilled actions, involves the activation or inhibition of neural networks in the brain. The type of apraxia manifested can vary depending on the involved neural network. Apraxia can be diagnosed by performing a comprehensive examination on patients, which includes a detailed history, neurological examination, and apraxia-specific testing. However, consensus on the best operational practices for assessing apraxia does not exist. The management of apraxia involves addressing its underlying causes through physical, occupational, or other task-specific therapies, alongside counseling. Long-term outcomes depend on the type of apraxia and its effect on the patient's activities of daily living. Associated deficits can vary from acalculia, agraphia, and aphasia to confusion, social anxiety, and low self-esteem. Some individuals with apraxia may necessitate long-term assisted nursing care.

摘要

失用症是指无法执行熟练动作,无论这些动作是之前学过的,还是可以通过观察他人或按照他人的指示立即模仿的。诊断需要排除虚弱、感觉功能障碍、理解缺陷或不协调等潜在原因。最初,雨果·卡尔·利希曼将失用症分为3种类型——肢体运动型、观念运动型和观念型。利希曼的描述为当今的分类奠定了基础。然而,与利希曼最初确定的类型相比,现在失用症的概念包含了更广泛的亚型。广义上,失用症可以根据执行的特定任务或采取的一般动作进行分类。不幸的是,失用症的亚型在文献中并没有得到一致的定义。主要的失用症形式如下。一般型:观念型:对先前已知技能概念的神经编码丧失。观念运动型:技能概念与其运动输出之间的连接受损。肢体运动型:与特定技能相关的运动输出丧失。概念型:使用工具能力丧失:特定任务型:言语型。特定构造型:绘图、构建或复制困难。术语“观念性失用症”有时也用于描述执行一系列动作能力的丧失。相比之下,“概念性失用症”是指概念本身的丧失。然而,关于用法差异的深入讨论超出了本文的范围。运用能力,即执行熟练动作的能力,涉及大脑神经网络的激活或抑制。表现出的失用症类型可能因涉及的神经网络而异。可以通过对患者进行全面检查来诊断失用症,包括详细的病史、神经系统检查和失用症特异性测试。然而,对于评估失用症的最佳操作方法并没有达成共识。失用症的管理包括通过物理治疗、职业治疗或其他特定任务治疗以及咨询来解决其潜在原因。长期结果取决于失用症的类型及其对患者日常生活活动的影响。相关缺陷可能从失算症、失写症和失语症到混乱、社交焦虑和自卑不等。一些失用症患者可能需要长期的辅助护理。

相似文献

3
Apraxia: Review and Update.失用症:综述与更新
J Clin Neurol. 2017 Oct;13(4):317-324. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2017.13.4.317.
4
Callosal apraxia.胼胝体失用症
Brain. 1983 Jun;106 (Pt 2):391-403. doi: 10.1093/brain/106.2.391.
6
Hugo Liepmann, Parkinson's disease and upper limb apraxia.胡戈·利普曼,帕金森病与上肢失用症。
Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
7
Apraxia: neural mechanisms and functional recovery.失用症:神经机制与功能恢复
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;110:335-45. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00028-9.
8
Apraxia.失用症
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2010 Aug;16(4 Behavioral Neurology):86-98. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000368262.53662.08.
9
Limb apraxia.肢体失用症
Semin Neurol. 2000;20(4):471-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-13180.
10
Limb apraxia and the "affordance competition hypothesis".肢体失用症与“可供性竞争假说”
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 28;9:429. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00429. eCollection 2015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验