• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗性研究的系统评价与Meta分析导论

Introduction to Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Therapeutic Studies.

作者信息

Al-Khabori Murtadha, Rasool Wasif

机构信息

Department of Hematology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Department of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

出版信息

Oman Med J. 2022 Sep 30;37(5):e428. doi: 10.5001/omj.2022.42. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.5001/omj.2022.42
PMID:36263198
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9556856/
Abstract

A systematic review is a specific and reproducible method to search, identify, select, appraise, and summarize all studies relevant to a particular health care question. In this paper, we will review the concept of level of evidence, define the terms systematic review and meta-analysis, and outline the steps in performing a systematic review and meta-analysis with an illustrative example. We will also introduce some important concepts in systematic reviews and meta-analyses like heterogeneity, publication bias, forest plots, and quality assessment. Finally, this review will focus on systematic reviews addressing therapeutic research questions.

摘要

系统评价是一种特定且可重复的方法,用于检索、识别、选择、评估和总结与特定医疗保健问题相关的所有研究。在本文中,我们将回顾证据水平的概念,定义系统评价和荟萃分析这两个术语,并通过一个示例概述进行系统评价和荟萃分析的步骤。我们还将介绍系统评价和荟萃分析中的一些重要概念,如异质性、发表偏倚、森林图和质量评估。最后,本综述将聚焦于针对治疗性研究问题的系统评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/7381f72de0d9/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/b1ec724436fb/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/f6d265d051b3/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/23f905bb2890/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/7381f72de0d9/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/b1ec724436fb/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/f6d265d051b3/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/23f905bb2890/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5862/9556856/7381f72de0d9/OMJ-37-05-2100078-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Introduction to Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Therapeutic Studies.治疗性研究的系统评价与Meta分析导论
Oman Med J. 2022 Sep 30;37(5):e428. doi: 10.5001/omj.2022.42. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol.动物研究中的发表偏倚:系统综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 27;2:23. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-23.
6
Systematic reviews: Key concepts for health professionals.系统评价:健康专业人员的关键概念。
Medwave. 2022 Oct 28;22(9). doi: 10.5867/medwave.2022.09.2622.
7
How to review and assess a systematic review and meta-analysis article: a methodological study (secondary publication).如何评价和综述系统评价和荟萃分析文章:方法学研究(二次出版物)。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:24. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.24. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-step Guide Part II: Study Execution.如何创建骨科系统评价:分步指南 第二部分:研究执行。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8):2124-2129. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.055. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
9
A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.对佩罗尼病文献中系统评价和荟萃分析报告的批判性分析。
J Sex Med. 2022 Apr;19(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
10

本文引用的文献

1
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
2
The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review.患者、干预措施、对照、结局(PICO)作为一种检索策略工具对文献检索质量的影响:一项系统评价。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):420-431. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.345. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
What is publication bias in a meta-analysis?荟萃分析中的发表偏倚是什么?
BMJ. 2015 Aug 14;351:h4419. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4419.
4
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.Meta 分析中固定效应模型和随机效应模型的基本介绍。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
5
Research: articulating questions, generating hypotheses, and choosing study designs.研究:明确问题、提出假设并选择研究设计。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014 Jan;67(1):31-4. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v67i1.1320.
6
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary Healthcare.系统评价与Meta分析:理解初级卫生保健中的最佳证据。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2013 Jan;2(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.109934.
7
Autologous stem cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自体干细胞移植治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jan 4;104(1):18-28. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr450. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
8
The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine.证据的级别及其在循证医学中的作用。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):305-310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
10
A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality.评估临床试验质量的总体框架。
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2009 May;4(2):79-88. doi: 10.2174/157488709788186021.