Suppr超能文献

对你的时间来说,什么更有价值?颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术的比较。

What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty.

作者信息

Katz Austen David, Song Junho, Bowles Daniel, Ng Terence, Neufeld Eric, Hasan Sayyida, Perfetti Dean, Sodhi Nipun, Essig David, Silber Jeff, Virk Sohrab

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, North Shore University Hospital and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra University, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):331-338. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_22. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the motion preservation of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) provides an attractive alternative with similar short-term results. However, there is a paucity of the economics of performing CDA over ACDF.

STUDY DESIGN

This was retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate relative-value-units (RVUs), operative time, and RVUs-per-minute between single-level ACDF and CDA. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity.

METHODS

Adults who underwent ACDF or CDA in 2011-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database datasets. Multivariate quantile regression was utilized.

RESULTS

There were 26,595 patients (2024 CDA). ACDF patients were older, more likely to be female, discharged to inpatient rehabilitation, and have a history of obesity, smoking, diabetes, steroid use, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists-class ≥3. ACDF had greater median RVUs-per-case (41.2 vs. 24.1) and RVUs-per-minute (0.36 vs. 0.27), despite greater operative-time (109 min vs. 92 min) ( < 0.001). ACDF predicted a 16.9 unit increase in median RVUs per case ( < 0.001, confidence interval [CI]: 16.3-17.5), an 8.81 min increase in median operative time per case ( < 0.001, CI: 5.69-11.9), and 0.119 unit increase in median RVUs-per-minute ( < 0.001, CI: 0.108-0.130). ACDF was associated with greater unadjusted rates of readmission (3.2% vs. 1.4%) morbidity (2.3% vs. 1.1%) ( < 0.001), but similar rates of reoperation (1.3% vs. 0.8%, = 0.080). After adjusting for significant patient-related and procedural factors, readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.695, = 0.130, CI: 0.434-1.113) and morbidity (OR = 1.102, = 0.688, CI: 0.685-1.773) was similar between ACDF and CDA.

CONCLUSIONS

Median RVUs-per-minute increased by 0.119 points for ACDF over CDA, or $257.7/h for each additional-hour of surgery. Adjusted 30-day outcomes were similar between procedures. Reimbursement for CDA does not appear to be in line with ACDF and may be a barrier to widespread usage.

摘要

引言

与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)相比,颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)的运动保留功能提供了一种具有吸引力的替代方案,且短期效果相似。然而,关于进行CDA相对于ACDF的经济学研究较少。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性研究。

目的

本研究的目的是评估单节段ACDF和CDA之间的相对价值单位(RVU)、手术时间和每分钟RVU。次要结局包括30天再入院、再次手术和发病率。

方法

对2011 - 2019年国家外科质量改进计划数据库数据集中接受ACDF或CDA的成年人进行研究。采用多变量分位数回归分析。

结果

共有26595例患者(2024例行CDA)。ACDF组患者年龄更大,女性比例更高,出院后进入住院康复机构,且有肥胖、吸烟、糖尿病、使用类固醇病史以及美国麻醉医师协会分级≥3级。尽管ACDF手术时间更长(109分钟对92分钟),但每例患者的中位数RVU更高(41.2对24.1),每分钟RVU也更高(0.36对0.27)(P<0.001)。ACDF预测每例患者的中位数RVU增加16.9个单位(P<0.001,置信区间[CI]:16.3 - 17.5),每例患者的中位数手术时间增加8.81分钟(P<0.001,CI:5.69 - 11.9),每分钟RVU中位数增加0.119个单位(P<0.001,CI:0.108 - 0.130)。ACDF与未调整的再入院率(3.2%对1.4%)和发病率(2.3%对1.1%)更高相关(P<0.001),但再次手术率相似(1.3%对0.8%,P = 0.080)。在对显著的患者相关和手术因素进行调整后,ACDF和CDA之间的再入院率(优势比[OR]=0.695,P = 0.130,CI:0.434 - 1.113)和发病率(OR = 1.102,P = 0.688,CI:0.685 - 1.773)相似。

结论

ACDF的每分钟RVU中位数比CDA增加0.119分,即每增加一小时手术,每小时费用增加257.7美元。调整后的30天结局在两种手术之间相似。CDA的报销似乎与ACDF不一致,这可能是其广泛应用的一个障碍。

相似文献

5
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

8
Cervical Disc Replacement.颈椎间盘置换术。
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验