Lee Gi Year, Cho Sooyoung, Baik Hee Jung, Lee Jong Wha, Woo Jae Hee, Lee Hyun Jung, Yoo Seung Hee
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Medical Center Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Apr;37(2):431-436. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00920-3. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
The supramaximal stimulation (SMS) of the TOF test causes uncomfortable sensations in patients. We aimed to determine whether the submaximal stimulation would be reliable in TOF tests with reduced painful sensation.
The accelomyography (AMG) and electromyography (EMG) monitor was applied at each arm and general anesthesia was induced and maintained by total intravenous anesthesia. At extubation, we conducted TOF test three times at each of four different currents: SMS, 70% SMS, 50% SMS, and 30% SMS. The same procedure was performed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) only with EMG, and the pain scores on the numerical rating scale (NRS) during the tests were recorded.
A total of 36 patients were enrolled. At extubation, TOF ratios with SMS in AMG and EMG were 112.0 ± 13.1% and 93.7 ± 8.9%, respectively. There were no significant differences in TOF ratios between the SMS and lower stimulation intensities. However, 30% and 50% SMS showed significantly higher rates of the unmeasurable results of tests in the PACU. In terms of the stimulation pain, NRS showed a downward pattern as the current decreased and was significantly lower at 50% and 30% SMS than the NRS at SMS.
The TOF test with submaximal stimulation is still reliable and can reduce stimulation pain. Considering the importance of the TOF results in determining extubation, the authors suggest the minimal current for the TOF test as 70% SMS.
强直刺激后单刺激(TOF)试验中的超强刺激(SMS)会给患者带来不适感。我们旨在确定次强刺激在减轻疼痛感觉的TOF试验中是否可靠。
在每个手臂应用加速度肌电图(AMG)和肌电图(EMG)监测仪,通过全静脉麻醉诱导并维持全身麻醉。拔管时,我们在四种不同电流强度下各进行三次TOF试验:SMS、70% SMS、50% SMS和30% SMS。在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)仅使用EMG重复相同操作,并记录试验期间数字评分量表(NRS)上的疼痛评分。
共纳入36例患者。拔管时,AMG和EMG中SMS下的TOF比值分别为112.0±13.1%和93.7±8.9%。SMS与较低刺激强度之间的TOF比值无显著差异。然而,30%和50% SMS在PACU中试验结果不可测量的发生率显著更高。在刺激疼痛方面,NRS随电流降低呈下降趋势,50%和30% SMS时的NRS显著低于SMS时的NRS。
次强刺激的TOF试验仍然可靠,且可减轻刺激疼痛。考虑到TOF结果对确定拔管的重要性,作者建议TOF试验的最小电流为70% SMS。