Brull S J, Ehrenwerth J, Silverman D G
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
Anesthesiology. 1990 Apr;72(4):629-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199004000-00009.
The present study evaluated responses to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation at a range of stimulating currents. Traditionally TOF has been applied with a supramaximal stimulus but this may be quite uncomfortable for the awake patient. In the first part of this study, 12 healthy volunteers quantified (by 10-cm visual analog scale) the discomfort associated with TOF stimulation at 20, 30, and 50 mA. The median VAS scores were 2, 3, and 6, respectively (P less than 0.05 for differences between each group). In the second part, single twitch and TOF responses were compared at 20, 30, and 50 mA in 64 postoperative and in 19 intraoperative patients who had ratios of the fourth to the first twitch (T4/T1) ranging from 0.15-1.03. In all patients, neuromuscular responses to nerve stimulation were recorded by a mechanogram, and the T4/T1 ratios were calculated. Although single twitch heights increased significantly as amperage was increased, there was no statistical difference in the T4/T1 ratios at the three different currents. The mean +/- SD T4/T1 ratios at 20, 30, and 50 mA were 0.795 +/- 0.247, 0.798 +/- 0.237, and 0.802 +/- 0.233, respectively (P = ns). It is concluded that TOF monitoring using a submaximal stimulus is more comfortable for the awake patient who is suspected of residual weakness, and that T4/T1 testing can be reliably accomplished intraoperatively as well as postoperatively using submaximal stimuli.
本研究评估了在一系列刺激电流下对四个成串刺激(TOF)的反应。传统上,TOF是采用超强刺激来进行的,但这对于清醒患者而言可能会相当不舒服。在本研究的第一部分中,12名健康志愿者通过10厘米视觉模拟量表对20毫安、30毫安和50毫安的TOF刺激所带来的不适进行了量化。视觉模拟量表的中位数得分分别为2、3和6(每组之间差异P小于0.05)。在第二部分中,对64名术后患者和19名术中患者在20毫安、30毫安和50毫安时的单刺激抽搐和TOF反应进行了比较,这些患者的第四个抽搐与第一个抽搐的比值(T4/T1)在0.15至1.03之间。在所有患者中,通过肌动图记录对神经刺激的神经肌肉反应,并计算T4/T1比值。尽管随着电流强度增加单刺激抽搐高度显著增加,但在三种不同电流下T4/T1比值并无统计学差异。20毫安、30毫安和50毫安时的平均±标准差T4/T1比值分别为0.795±0.247、0.798±0.237和0.802±0.233(P = 无显著性差异)。得出的结论是,对于怀疑有残余肌无力的清醒患者,使用次最大刺激进行TOF监测会更舒适,并且使用次最大刺激在术中以及术后均可可靠地完成T4/T1测试。