From the Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory (K.M.Q., J.T., M.Z., J.F.-A., F.L., S.G., P.V., P.R.-N.), The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (K.M.Q., A.A., B.J.-C., B.G.), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Departments of Medicine (K.M.Q., B.J.-C., B.G.) and Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.T., M.Z., J.F.-A., F.L., J.-P.S., S.G., P.V., P.R.-N.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Montreal Neurological Institute (J.T., M.Z., J.F.-A., F.L., G.M., J.-P.S., P.R.-N.), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Radiochemistry (G.M.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry (T.P.), Pittsburgh University, PA; and Department of Psychiatry (S.G., P.R.-N.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Neurology. 2022 Nov 29;99(22):e2428-e2436. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201198. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
To assess the concordance and discordance between the core Alzheimer disease (AD) CSF biomarkers and [F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET patterns evaluated clinically in memory clinic patients who meet appropriate use criteria for AD biomarker investigations.
We retrospectively assessed participants with atypical and/or early-onset dementia evaluated at a tertiary care memory clinic. All individuals underwent CSF evaluations for Aβ42, phosphorylated tau (P-tau181) and total tau, and brain [F]FDG-PET. [F]FDG-PET data were visually interpreted by 2 nuclear medicine experts as being consistent with AD or non-AD. CSF biomarker results were similarly grouped into AD biomarker positive/negative. Contingency tables and Kappa coefficients were used to establish the level of agreement and disagreement between CSF and [F]FDG-PET results in all individuals.
One hundred thirty-six individuals had both [F]FDG-PET and lumbar puncture performed as part of the early-onset and/or atypical dementia assessments. [F]FDG-PET showed a pattern suggestive of AD in 43% of patients, while CSF biomarkers showed results consistent with AD in 57% of participants. In patients who met criteria for AD biomarker investigations, we found that [F]FDG-PET was discordant with CSF AD biomarkers in nearly 20% of cases; 12% of individuals with [F]FDG-PET scans consistent with AD had AD-negative CSF results; and 7% of individuals with [F]FDG-PET scans not consistent with AD had AD-positive CSF results, potentially suggesting atypical AD variants or less advanced neurodegeneration. [F]FDG-PET discriminated patients with an AD-positive CSF profile from patients with an AD-negative profile with a sensitivity and specificity higher than 80% (sensitivity: 81%, 95% CI = 71-88%, SP: 81%, 95% CI = 68-89%). Furthermore, [F]FDG-PET had a positive predictive value of 87% (95% CI = 78-93%) and a negative predictive value of 72% (95% CI = 60-82%).
CSF and [F]FDG-PET disagreed in nearly 20% of the cases studied in this clinical series. While CSF Aβ42 and P-tau181 biomarkers are specific for AD, the topographical information from [F]FDG-PET may provide complementary information.
评估符合阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物适当应用标准的记忆门诊患者中,核心 AD 脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物与 [F]氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)-正电子发射断层扫描(PET)模式的一致性和不协调性。
我们回顾性评估了在三级保健记忆门诊就诊的、表现为非典型和/或早发性痴呆的参与者。所有患者均接受了 Aβ42、磷酸化tau(P-tau181)和总tau 的 CSF 评估,以及脑 [F]FDG-PET。2 位核医学专家对 [F]FDG-PET 数据进行了视觉解读,结果显示与 AD 或非 AD 一致。CSF 生物标志物结果也同样分为 AD 生物标志物阳性/阴性。我们使用列联表和 Kappa 系数来确定所有个体的 CSF 和 [F]FDG-PET 结果之间的一致性和不协调性的程度。
136 名患者在进行早期和/或非典型性痴呆评估时同时进行了 [F]FDG-PET 和腰椎穿刺。[F]FDG-PET 在 43%的患者中显示出 AD 模式,而 CSF 生物标志物在 57%的参与者中显示出与 AD 一致的结果。在符合 AD 生物标志物研究标准的患者中,我们发现近 20%的病例中 [F]FDG-PET 与 CSF AD 生物标志物不相符;12%的 [F]FDG-PET 扫描与 AD 一致的患者 CSF 结果为 AD 阴性;7%的 [F]FDG-PET 扫描与 AD 不一致的患者 CSF 结果为 AD 阳性,可能提示为不典型 AD 变体或神经退行性变程度较低。[F]FDG-PET 可以将 CSF 生物标志物阳性的 AD 患者与 CSF 生物标志物阴性的 AD 患者区分开来,其敏感性和特异性均高于 80%(敏感性:81%,95%CI=71-88%,特异性:81%,95%CI=68-89%)。此外,[F]FDG-PET 的阳性预测值为 87%(95%CI=78-93%),阴性预测值为 72%(95%CI=60-82%)。
在本临床系列研究中,近 20%的病例 CSF 和 [F]FDG-PET 结果不相符。虽然 CSF Aβ42 和 P-tau181 生物标志物对 AD 具有特异性,但 [F]FDG-PET 的解剖信息可能提供补充信息。