• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Novel use of a virtual driving assessment to classify driver skill at the time of licensure.虚拟驾驶评估在驾照核发时对驾驶员技能进行分类的新用途。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2022 May;87:313-326. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Licensing Examination and Crash Outcomes Postlicensure in Young Drivers.许可考试和许可后年轻驾驶员的碰撞结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8780.
3
Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase.年轻驾驶员的事故率与驾照年龄、驾龄和驾照阶段有关。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 May 20.
4
A Novel Health-Transportation Partnership Paves The Road For Young Driver Safety Through Virtual Assessment.一种新型健康交通伙伴关系通过虚拟评估为年轻驾驶员安全铺平道路。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Oct;39(10):1792-1798. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00802.
5
Driving Skills at Licensure and Time to First Crash.领证后的驾驶技能与首次事故发生时间。
Pediatrics. 2023 Nov 1;152(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060817.
6
Comparison of older and younger novice driver crash rates: Informing the need for extended Graduated Driver Licensing restrictions.年长与年轻新手驾驶员撞车率比较:明确延长分级驾驶证限制的必要性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
Learner driver experiences and crash risk as an unsupervised driver.新手驾驶员的驾驶经验与非监督驾驶时的事故风险。
J Safety Res. 2013 Sep;46:41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
8
The effect of the learner license Graduated Driver Licensing components on teen drivers' crashes.学习驾照的驾龄限制成分对青少年司机事故的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:327-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Practicing for and performance on drivers license tests in relation to gender differences in crash involvement among novice drivers.关于新手驾驶员碰撞事故参与情况中的性别差异,驾照考试的练习与表现。
J Safety Res. 2007;38(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
10
An evaluation of the effect of Ohio's graduated driver licensing law on motor vehicle crashes and crash outcomes involving drivers 16 to 20 years of age.对俄亥俄州分级驾驶员执照法对涉及16至20岁驾驶员的机动车碰撞事故及碰撞后果的影响进行评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 19;18(4):344-350. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1209493. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromodulation on the ground and in the clouds: a mini review of transcranial direct current stimulation for altering performance in interactive driving and flight simulators.地面与云端的神经调节:经颅直流电刺激对交互式驾驶和飞行模拟器中行为表现影响的小型综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 28;15:1479887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1479887. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Licensing Examination and Crash Outcomes Postlicensure in Young Drivers.许可考试和许可后年轻驾驶员的碰撞结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8780.
2
In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.利用SHRP 2自然驾驶研究对高危驾驶员中碰撞致因因素及潜在的高级驾驶辅助系统干预措施进行深入分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S68-S73. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1979529. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Rethinking Cell Phone Use While Driving: Isolated Risk Behavior or a Pattern of Risk-Taking Associated with Impulsivity in Young Drivers?重新审视驾车时使用手机的行为:这是一种孤立的风险行为,还是与年轻驾驶员冲动性相关的冒险模式?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115640.
4
A taxonomy of driving errors and violations: Evidence from the naturalistic driving study.驾驶错误和违规行为分类:自然驾驶研究的证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105873. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105873. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
5
A Novel Health-Transportation Partnership Paves The Road For Young Driver Safety Through Virtual Assessment.一种新型健康交通伙伴关系通过虚拟评估为年轻驾驶员安全铺平道路。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Oct;39(10):1792-1798. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00802.
6
Simulator Pre-Screening of Underprepared Drivers Prior to Licensing On-Road Examination: Clustering of Virtual Driving Test Time Series Data.执照上路考试前对准备不足的驾驶员进行模拟器预筛查:虚拟驾驶测试时间序列数据的聚类分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 18;22(6):e13995. doi: 10.2196/13995.
7
Working Memory Development and Motor Vehicle Crashes in Young Drivers.工作记忆发展与年轻驾驶员的机动车事故。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911421. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11421.
8
Crash Risk and Risky Driving Behavior Among Adolescents During Learner and Independent Driving Periods.青少年在学习驾驶和独立驾驶期间的碰撞风险和危险驾驶行为。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Nov;63(5):568-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
9
Graduated driver licensing (GDL) in the United States in 2016: A literature review and commentary.2016年美国的分级驾驶员执照制度:文献综述与评论
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
10
Executive Function Capacities, Negative Driving Behavior and Crashes in Young Drivers.年轻驾驶员的执行功能能力、负面驾驶行为与撞车事故
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 28;14(11):1314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111314.

虚拟驾驶评估在驾照核发时对驾驶员技能进行分类的新用途。

Novel use of a virtual driving assessment to classify driver skill at the time of licensure.

作者信息

Walshe Elizabeth A, Elliott Michael R, Romer Daniel, Cheng Shukai, Curry Allison E, Seacrist Tom, Oppenheimer Natalie, Wyner Abraham J, Grethlein David, Gonzalez Alexander K, Winston Flaura K

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

University of Michigan School of Public Health, MI, USA.

出版信息

Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2022 May;87:313-326. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2022.04.009
PMID:36267629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9581334/
Abstract

Motor vehicle crash rates are highest immediately after licensure, and driver error is one of the leading causes. Yet, few studies have quantified driving skills at the time of licensure, making it difficult to identify at-risk drivers independent driving. Using data from a virtual driving assessment implemented into the licensing workflow in Ohio, this study presents the first population-level study classifying degree of skill at the time of licensure and validating these against a measure of on-road performance: license exam outcomes. Principal component and cluster analysis of 33,249 virtual driving assessments identified 20 Skill Clusters that were then grouped into 4 major summary "Driving Classes"; i (i.e. careful and skilled drivers) (i.e. an average new driver with minor vehicle control skill deficits) (i.e. drivers with more control issues and who take more risks); and iv) i.e. drivers with even more control issues and more reckless and risk-taking behavior). Category labels were determined based on patterns of VDA skill deficits alone (i.e. agnostic of the license examination outcome). These Skill Clusters and Driving Classes had different distributions by sex and age, reflecting age-related licensing policies (i.e. those under 18 and subject to GDL and driver education and training), and were differentially associated with subsequent performance on the on-road licensing examination (showing criterion validity). The and classes had lower than average odds of failing, and the other two more problematic Driving Classes had higher odds of failing. Thus, this study showed that license applicants can be classified based on their driving skills at the time of licensure. Future studies will validate these Skill Cluster classes in relation to their prediction of post-licensure crash outcomes.

摘要

机动车撞车率在获得驾照后立即达到最高,而驾驶员失误是主要原因之一。然而,很少有研究对获得驾照时的驾驶技能进行量化,这使得识别有风险的独立驾驶员变得困难。利用俄亥俄州驾照发放流程中实施的虚拟驾驶评估数据,本研究首次进行了基于人群的研究,对获得驾照时的技能水平进行分类,并将其与一项道路驾驶表现指标——驾照考试结果进行验证。对33249次虚拟驾驶评估进行主成分分析和聚类分析,确定了20个技能组,然后将其分为4个主要的汇总“驾驶类别”:i)(即谨慎且熟练的驾驶员);ii)(即平均水平的新驾驶员,存在轻微车辆控制技能缺陷);iii)(即存在更多控制问题且冒险的驾驶员);iv)(即存在更多控制问题且行为更鲁莽、冒险的驾驶员)。类别标签仅根据虚拟驾驶评估技能缺陷模式确定(即不考虑驾照考试结果)。这些技能组和驾驶类别在性别和年龄上分布不同,反映了与年龄相关的驾照政策(即18岁以下且受分级驾照制度以及驾驶员教育和培训约束的人群),并且与随后道路驾照考试的表现存在差异关联(显示出效标效度)。i类和ii类考试不及格的几率低于平均水平,而另外两个问题较多的驾驶类别不及格的几率更高。因此,本研究表明,可以根据驾照申请人获得驾照时的驾驶技能对其进行分类。未来的研究将验证这些技能组类别与它们对获得驾照后撞车结果预测的相关性。