Walshe Elizabeth A, Elliott Michael R, Romer Daniel, Cheng Shukai, Curry Allison E, Seacrist Tom, Oppenheimer Natalie, Wyner Abraham J, Grethlein David, Gonzalez Alexander K, Winston Flaura K
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Michigan School of Public Health, MI, USA.
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2022 May;87:313-326. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Motor vehicle crash rates are highest immediately after licensure, and driver error is one of the leading causes. Yet, few studies have quantified driving skills at the time of licensure, making it difficult to identify at-risk drivers independent driving. Using data from a virtual driving assessment implemented into the licensing workflow in Ohio, this study presents the first population-level study classifying degree of skill at the time of licensure and validating these against a measure of on-road performance: license exam outcomes. Principal component and cluster analysis of 33,249 virtual driving assessments identified 20 Skill Clusters that were then grouped into 4 major summary "Driving Classes"; i (i.e. careful and skilled drivers) (i.e. an average new driver with minor vehicle control skill deficits) (i.e. drivers with more control issues and who take more risks); and iv) i.e. drivers with even more control issues and more reckless and risk-taking behavior). Category labels were determined based on patterns of VDA skill deficits alone (i.e. agnostic of the license examination outcome). These Skill Clusters and Driving Classes had different distributions by sex and age, reflecting age-related licensing policies (i.e. those under 18 and subject to GDL and driver education and training), and were differentially associated with subsequent performance on the on-road licensing examination (showing criterion validity). The and classes had lower than average odds of failing, and the other two more problematic Driving Classes had higher odds of failing. Thus, this study showed that license applicants can be classified based on their driving skills at the time of licensure. Future studies will validate these Skill Cluster classes in relation to their prediction of post-licensure crash outcomes.
机动车撞车率在获得驾照后立即达到最高,而驾驶员失误是主要原因之一。然而,很少有研究对获得驾照时的驾驶技能进行量化,这使得识别有风险的独立驾驶员变得困难。利用俄亥俄州驾照发放流程中实施的虚拟驾驶评估数据,本研究首次进行了基于人群的研究,对获得驾照时的技能水平进行分类,并将其与一项道路驾驶表现指标——驾照考试结果进行验证。对33249次虚拟驾驶评估进行主成分分析和聚类分析,确定了20个技能组,然后将其分为4个主要的汇总“驾驶类别”:i)(即谨慎且熟练的驾驶员);ii)(即平均水平的新驾驶员,存在轻微车辆控制技能缺陷);iii)(即存在更多控制问题且冒险的驾驶员);iv)(即存在更多控制问题且行为更鲁莽、冒险的驾驶员)。类别标签仅根据虚拟驾驶评估技能缺陷模式确定(即不考虑驾照考试结果)。这些技能组和驾驶类别在性别和年龄上分布不同,反映了与年龄相关的驾照政策(即18岁以下且受分级驾照制度以及驾驶员教育和培训约束的人群),并且与随后道路驾照考试的表现存在差异关联(显示出效标效度)。i类和ii类考试不及格的几率低于平均水平,而另外两个问题较多的驾驶类别不及格的几率更高。因此,本研究表明,可以根据驾照申请人获得驾照时的驾驶技能对其进行分类。未来的研究将验证这些技能组类别与它们对获得驾照后撞车结果预测的相关性。