• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative Analysis of the Roles of Physicians and Nurses in Providing Decision Support to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia and Lymphoma.为复发或难治性白血病和淋巴瘤患者提供决策支持中医生和护士角色的定性分析。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221131003. doi: 10.1177/10732748221131003.
2
Barriers to the Collaboration Between Hematologists and Palliative Care Teams on Relapse or Refractory Leukemia and Malignant Lymphoma Patients' Care: A Qualitative Study.血液科医生与姑息治疗团队在复发或难治性白血病及恶性淋巴瘤患者护理方面的合作障碍:一项定性研究
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Dec;33(10):977-984. doi: 10.1177/1049909115611081. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
5
Physicians and nurses view on their roles in communication and collaboration with families: A qualitative study.医生和护士对其在与家庭沟通和协作中的角色的看法:一项定性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Dec;37(4):1109-1122. doi: 10.1111/scs.13185. Epub 2023 May 29.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Experiences and hidden needs of older patients, their families and their physicians in palliative chemotherapy decision-making: a qualitative study.老年患者、其家属和医生在姑息化疗决策中的经验和潜在需求:一项定性研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 9;50(7):779-786. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa020.
8
Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study.重症期间影响维持生命技术沟通与决策的因素:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 May 23;6(5):e010451. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010451.
9
Canadian hospital nurses' roles in communication and decision-making about goals of care: An interpretive description of critical incidents.加拿大医院护士在沟通和决策目标关怀方面的角色:对关键事件的解释性描述。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
10
Communication and Decision-Making About End-of-Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中关于临终关怀的沟通与决策
Am J Crit Care. 2017 Jul;26(4):336-341. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2017774.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient perspectives on treatment for mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan.日本患者对套细胞淋巴瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病治疗的看法。
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2024 Jun 27;64(2):119-128. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.24016. Epub 2024 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral Patterns in Breaking Bad News Communication: An Ethnographic Study with Hematologists.《在坏消息沟通中行为模式:一项对血液学家的民族志研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052585.
2
Effectiveness of Integrated Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.综合姑息治疗和肿瘤学治疗对急性髓系白血病患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;7(2):238-245. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6343.
3
Emotion And Symptom-focused Engagement (EASE): a randomized phase II trial of an integrated psychological and palliative care intervention for patients with acute leukemia.情绪和症状为焦点的参与(EASE):一项针对急性白血病患者的心理和姑息治疗综合干预的随机二期试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jan;28(1):163-176. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04723-2. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Barriers to end-of-life discussions among hematologists: A qualitative study.阻碍血液学家进行临终讨论的因素:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 May;32(5):1021-1029. doi: 10.1177/0269216318759862.
5
Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.姑息治疗融入标准肿瘤学治疗中:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):96-112. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1474. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
6
Effect of Inpatient Palliative Care on Quality of Life 2 Weeks After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.住院姑息治疗对造血干细胞移植后2周生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2094-2103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16786.
7
Patient experiences of acute myeloid leukemia: A qualitative study about diagnosis, illness understanding, and treatment decision-making.急性髓系白血病患者的经历:一项关于诊断、疾病认知和治疗决策的定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2063-2068. doi: 10.1002/pon.4309. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
Barriers to Quality End-of-Life Care for Patients With Blood Cancers.血液癌症患者获得优质临终关怀的障碍。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 10;34(26):3126-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8177. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
Barriers to the Collaboration Between Hematologists and Palliative Care Teams on Relapse or Refractory Leukemia and Malignant Lymphoma Patients' Care: A Qualitative Study.血液科医生与姑息治疗团队在复发或难治性白血病及恶性淋巴瘤患者护理方面的合作障碍:一项定性研究
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Dec;33(10):977-984. doi: 10.1177/1049909115611081. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
10
End-of-life care for blood cancers: a series of focus groups with hematologic oncologists.血液系统恶性肿瘤的临终关怀:与血液肿瘤学家进行的一系列焦点小组讨论
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Nov;10(6):e396-403. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001537. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

为复发或难治性白血病和淋巴瘤患者提供决策支持中医生和护士角色的定性分析。

Qualitative Analysis of the Roles of Physicians and Nurses in Providing Decision Support to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia and Lymphoma.

机构信息

Otakanomori Chirdren's Clinic, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Human Health Sciences, 12918Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221131003. doi: 10.1177/10732748221131003.

DOI:10.1177/10732748221131003
PMID:36268680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9597203/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the roles of hematologists and other professionals in providing decision support to patients with relapsed or refractory leukemia and lymphoma.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews involving 11 hematologists in Japan.

RESULT

We identified 7 categories related to the roles of hematologists in providing direct decision support to patients: (1) preparing patients before informed consent, (2) selecting the information to convey, (3) choosing a method for conveying this information, (4) respecting the intentions of patients and their families, (5) directing decision-making and considering fairness, (6) considering the emotional aspects of patients and their families, and (7) providing support after discussing treatment options. We also identified the following 5 subcategories related to the roles of hematologists in multidisciplinary collaboration: (1) communicating with other professionals, (2) gathering information from them, (3) providing information to them, (4) managing the entire medical team, and (5) encouraging nurses to actively participate with patients throughout the decision-making process.

CONCLUSION

Through content analysis, the hematologist's direct role in decision-making was extracted as preparation and consideration in situations where information about decision-making is communicated, and emotional support after the information is communicated. In addition, active participation in discussions, sharing information about the patient's situation and relevant discussions, and emotional support as the hematologist's expected roles in other professions were extracted. The results therefore suggest that a multidisciplinary team is needed to share information and provide multidimensional support to patients.

摘要

简介

本研究探讨了血液科医生和其他专业人员在为复发或难治性白血病和淋巴瘤患者提供决策支持方面的作用。

方法

这是一项使用深入的半结构式访谈的定性研究,涉及日本的 11 名血液科医生。

结果

我们确定了与血液科医生在为患者提供直接决策支持方面的 7 个角色类别:(1)在知情同意前准备患者,(2)选择要传达的信息,(3)选择传达此信息的方法,(4)尊重患者及其家属的意愿,(5)指导决策并考虑公平性,(6)考虑患者及其家属的情绪方面,以及(7)在讨论治疗方案后提供支持。我们还确定了与血液科医生在多学科协作中的 5 个亚类别:(1)与其他专业人员沟通,(2)从他们那里收集信息,(3)向他们提供信息,(4)管理整个医疗团队,以及(5)鼓励护士在决策过程中积极与患者合作。

结论

通过内容分析,从传达决策信息的情况中提取出血液科医生在决策中的直接作用,即准备和考虑,以及传达信息后的情感支持。此外,还提取了在其他专业中积极参与讨论、分享患者情况和相关讨论信息以及提供情感支持作为血液科医生的预期角色。因此,结果表明需要多学科团队来共享信息并为患者提供多维支持。