• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识笔试成绩的潜在影响因素。

Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge.

作者信息

Norman G R, Smith E K, Powles A C, Rooney P J, Henry N L, Dodd P E

出版信息

Med Educ. 1987 Jul;21(4):297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00367.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00367.x
PMID:3626897
Abstract

The study compares two popular forms of written tests; the multiple choice test (MCQ) and the Modified Essay Question (MEQ). Two factors were varied in the experiment: the format of the questions (multiple choice, directed free response, or open-ended free response) and the context of the questions (in a patient problem or in random sequence). Six problems were developed in each version, and administered to a total of 36 medical students at three educational levels using a Latin-square design. The results showed a significant effect of each factor in the design, amounting to a difference of 8.7% between MCQ and directed free response, 4.2% between directed and open-ended free response and 4.3% between problem and random context. However, the correlation of scores based on content across the formats approached unity after correction for attenuation. A process score, based on the style and presentation in the undirected format, correlated more strongly with the free-response questions. The results suggest that, although the MCQ and MEQ may assess different skills, there is a very strong relationship between content scores derived from the two formats. The free response formats may present the opportunity for assessment of other factors related to presentation if scoring procedures are modified. Finally, the effect of randomizing questions is a deterioration of performance when compared to placing questions in the problem context.

摘要

该研究比较了两种常见的笔试形式

多项选择题(MCQ)和改良简答题(MEQ)。实验中改变了两个因素:问题的形式(多项选择、定向自由回答或开放式自由回答)和问题的背景(在患者问题情境中或随机排列)。每个版本编制了6个问题,并采用拉丁方设计对三个教育水平的总共36名医学生进行测试。结果显示设计中的每个因素都有显著影响,MCQ与定向自由回答之间的差异为8.7%,定向自由回答与开放式自由回答之间的差异为4.2%,问题情境与随机背景之间的差异为4.3%。然而,在对衰减进行校正后,基于内容的不同形式得分之间的相关性接近1。基于无定向形式的风格和呈现方式得出的过程得分与自由回答问题的相关性更强。结果表明,虽然MCQ和MEQ可能评估不同的技能,但两种形式得出的内容得分之间存在非常强的关系。如果修改评分程序,自由回答形式可能为评估与呈现方式相关的其他因素提供机会。最后,与将问题置于问题情境中相比,随机排列问题的效果是成绩下降。

相似文献

1
Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge.知识笔试成绩的潜在影响因素。
Med Educ. 1987 Jul;21(4):297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00367.x.
2
Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?论文及其他“开放式”问题在临床医学书面总结性评估中是否应保留一席之地?
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 28;14:249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0249-2.
3
Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.本科教育中高阶认知技能的评估:改进的论文式题目还是多项选择题?研究论文。
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Nov 28;7:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-49.
4
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
5
Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.计算机化医学评估中长菜单式问题与开放式问题的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Oct 10;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-50.
6
Testing of medical students with open-ended, uncued questions.使用开放式、无提示问题对医学生进行测试。
Hum Pathol. 1995 Apr;26(4):362-5. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90134-5.
7
A comparison of student performance in multiple-choice and long essay questions in the MBBS stage I physiology examination at the University of the West Indies (Mona Campus).西印度群岛大学(莫纳校区)医学学士阶段 I 生理学考试中多项选择题和短文问答题中学生表现的比较。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Jun;34(2):86-9. doi: 10.1152/advan.00087.2009.
8
The Effect of English Language on Multiple Choice Question Scores of Thai Medical Students.英语对泰国医学生多项选择题成绩的影响。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Apr;99(4):446-52.
9
A solution to the cueing effects of multiple choice questions: the Un-Q format.多项选择题提示效应的一种解决方案:非选择题格式。
Med Educ. 1993 Jul;27(4):371-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00284.x.
10
Evaluation of Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as a tool for Assessing the Cognitive Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students.评估改良短文问题(MEQ)和多项选择题(MCQ)作为评估本科医学生认知技能工具的效果。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2011 Jan;5(1):39-43.

引用本文的文献

1
An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.对医学生高风险测试中的多项选择题和简答题进行的实验比较。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;29(3):783-801. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10266-3. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
2
The effect of Snapchat on learner satisfaction and anatomical knowledge retention: Preliminary observations.阅后即焚应用程序对学习者满意度及解剖学知识记忆的影响:初步观察
FASEB Bioadv. 2021 Aug 27;3(11):909-917. doi: 10.1096/fba.2021-00052. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Assessment formats in dental medicine: An overview.
牙科医学中的评估形式:概述。
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Aug 15;33(4):Doc65. doi: 10.3205/zma001064. eCollection 2016.
4
Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?论文及其他“开放式”问题在临床医学书面总结性评估中是否应保留一席之地?
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 28;14:249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0249-2.
5
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
6
Using computers for assessment in medicine.医学领域中计算机在评估方面的应用。
BMJ. 2004 Sep 11;329(7466):606-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7466.606.