Nguyen Wendy T, Remskar Mojca, Zupfer Elena H, Kaizer Alex M, Fromer Ilana R, Chugaieva Iryna, Kloesel Benjamin
The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN: , , , and are Assistant Professors of Anesthesiology, Fellowship in Pediatric Anesthesiology, American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) certified, ABA Pediatric Anesthesiology certified; is Professor of Anesthesiology, ABA certified, ABA Pediatric Anesthesiology certified; and is Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, ABA.
is Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO.
J Educ Perioper Med. 2022 Jul 1;24(3):E690. doi: 10.46374/volxxiv_issue3_nguyen. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
The American Association of Medical Colleges deemed performing lifesaving procedures, such as airway management, a necessary medical student competency for transitioning to residency. Anesthesiology clerkships provide the unique opportunity for medical students to practice these procedures in a safe and controlled environment. We aimed to develop a checklist that assesses medical students' ability to perform the main steps of a general anesthesia induction with endotracheal intubation in the clinical setting.
We created a Checklist containing items aligned with our clerkship objectives. We modified it after receiving feedback and trialing it in the clinical setting. Medical students were evaluated with the Checklist using a pre- and post-clerkship study design: (1) in a simulation setting at the beginning of the clerkship; and (2) in the operating room at the end of the clerkship. Using paired -tests, we calculated pre- and post-clerkship Checklist scores to determine curriculum efficacy. A value of <.05 was determined to be statistically significant. We examined rater agreement between overall scores with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Thirty medical students participated in the study. The ICC for agreement was 0.875 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.704-0.944). The ICC for consistency was 0.897 (95% CI, 0.795-0.950). There was a statistically significant improvement in the score from baseline to final evaluation of 3.6 points (95% CI, 2.5-5.2; P = .001).
The statistically significant change in Checklist scores suggests that our medical students gained knowledge and experience during the introductory clerkship inducing general anesthesia and were able to demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical environment.
美国医学院协会认为实施诸如气道管理等救生程序是医学生向住院医师阶段过渡所需具备的必要能力。麻醉科实习为医学生提供了在安全可控环境中练习这些程序的独特机会。我们旨在制定一份清单,以评估医学生在临床环境中进行气管插管全身麻醉诱导主要步骤的能力。
我们创建了一份与实习目标相符的清单项目。在收到反馈并在临床环境中试用后对其进行了修改。采用实习前和实习后的研究设计,使用该清单对医学生进行评估:(1)在实习开始时的模拟环境中;(2)在实习结束时的手术室中。使用配对检验,我们计算实习前和实习后的清单分数,以确定课程效果。P值<.05被确定为具有统计学意义。我们使用组内相关系数(ICC)检查评分者在总体分数上的一致性。
30名医学生参与了该研究。一致性的ICC为0.875(95%置信区间[CI],0.704 - 0.944)。重复性的ICC为0.897(95%CI,0.795 - 0.950)。从基线到最终评估,分数有统计学意义的提高,提高了3.6分(95%CI,2.5 - 5.2;P = .001)。
清单分数的统计学显著变化表明,我们的医学生在全身麻醉诱导入门实习期间获得了知识和经验,并且能够在临床环境中展示他们的知识。