Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Aug 1;101(5):1039-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.052. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
A structured didactic radiation oncology clerkship curriculum for medical students is in use at multiple academic medical centers. Objective evidence supporting this educational approach over the traditional clerkship model is lacking. This study evaluated the curriculum efficacy using an objective knowledge assessment.
Medical students received the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) curriculum consisting of 3 lectures (Overview of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Biology/Physics, and Practical Aspects of Simulation/Radiation Emergencies) and a radiation oncology treatment-planning workshop. A standardized 20-item multiple choice question (MCQ) knowledge assessment was completed pre- and post-curriculum and approximately 6 months after receiving the curriculum.
One hundred forty-six students at 22 academic medical centers completed the ROECSG curriculum from July to November 2016. One hundred nine students completed pre- and post-clerkship MCQ knowledge assessments (response rate 74.7%). Twenty-four students reported a prior rotation at a ROECSG institution and were excluded from analysis. Mean assessment scores increased from pre- to post-curriculum (63.9% vs 80.2%, P < .01). Mean MCQ knowledge subdomain assessment scores all improved post-curriculum (t test, P values < .01). Post-scores for students rotating de novo at ROECSG institutions (n = 30) were higher compared with pre-scores for students with ≥1 prior rotations at non-ROECSG institutions (n = 55) (77.3% vs 68.8%, P = .01), with an effect size of 0.8. Students who completed rotations at ROECSG institutions continued to demonstrate a trend toward improved performance on the objective knowledge assessment at approximately 6 months after curriculum exposure (70.5% vs 65.6%, P = .11).
Objective evaluation of a structured didactic curriculum for the radiation oncology clerkship at early and late time points demonstrated significant improvement in radiation oncology knowledge. Students who completed clerkships at ROECSG institutions performed objectively better than students who completed clerkships at non-ROECSG institutions. These results support including a structured didactic curriculum as a standard component of the radiation oncology clerkship.
目前,多个学术医学中心正在使用针对医学生的结构化教学放射肿瘤学实习课程。缺乏支持这种教育方法优于传统实习模式的客观证据。本研究使用客观知识评估来评估该课程的效果。
医学生接受放射肿瘤学教育协作研究组(ROECSG)课程,包括 3 次讲座(概述放射肿瘤学、放射生物学/物理学和模拟/放射急症的实际方面)和一次放射肿瘤学治疗计划工作坊。在课程前后和大约 6 个月后,学生们完成了一个标准化的 20 项多项选择题(MCQ)知识评估。
2016 年 7 月至 11 月期间,22 个学术医学中心的 146 名学生完成了 ROECSG 课程。109 名学生完成了实习前和实习后 MCQ 知识评估(应答率为 74.7%)。24 名报告在 ROECSG 机构进行过先前轮转的学生被排除在分析之外。评估得分从实习前到实习后均有所提高(63.9%比 80.2%,P<.01)。实习后,所有 MCQ 知识子领域评估得分均提高(t 检验,P 值<.01)。在 ROECSG 机构进行全新轮转的学生(n=30)的后测分数高于在非 ROECSG 机构进行过至少 1 次轮转的学生(n=55)(77.3%比 68.8%,P=.01),效果量为 0.8。在课程接触后约 6 个月,完成 ROECSG 机构轮转的学生继续表现出客观知识评估成绩提高的趋势(70.5%比 65.6%,P=.11)。
对放射肿瘤学实习的结构化教学课程的早期和晚期客观评估表明,放射肿瘤学知识有显著提高。在 ROECSG 机构完成实习的学生比在非 ROECSG 机构完成实习的学生表现出更好的客观成绩。这些结果支持将结构化教学课程作为放射肿瘤学实习的标准组成部分。