• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期采用手动淋巴引流和康复运动对口腔癌患者发病率和淋巴水肿的影响。

Effect of early interventions with manual lymphatic drainage and rehabilitation exercise on morbidity and lymphedema in patients with oral cavity cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 21;101(42):e30910. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030910.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000030910
PMID:36281150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9592419/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are clinical and statistical inconsistencies regarding early intervention with manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term effect of early interventions with rehabilitation exercise versus MLD and rehabilitation exercise in terms of pain, range of motion (ROM) and lymphedema in patients with oral cancer after surgery.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients who underwent surgery from December 2014 to December 2018 participated in this randomized single-blind study. There were 20 patients in the rehabilitation (R) group and 19 in the MLD (M) plus rehabilitation group. The R group received 30 minutes of rehabilitation intervention; and the M group received 30 minutes of MLD, in addition to 30 minutes of rehabilitation intervention in a work day. Clinical measures, including the visual analog pain scale (VAS), ROM of the neck and shoulder, ultrasonography and face distance for lymphedema, and the Földi and Miller lymphedema scales, were assessed before surgery, before intervention and when discharged from the hospital.

RESULTS

The VAS pain score, ROM of the neck, and internal and external rotation of the right shoulder were significantly improved after the interventions. Right-face distance (P = .005), and skin-to-bone distance (SBD) of the bilateral horizontal mandible and left ascending mandibular ramus were significantly improved after the interventions. Left lateral flexion of the neck (P = .038) and SBD of the right ascending mandibular ramus (P < .001) in the MLD group showed more improvement than that of the rehabilitation group.

CONCLUSION

Early intervention with MLD and the rehabilitation program were effective in improving ROM of the neck and controlling lymphedema in acute-phase rehabilitation. The preliminary findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for early intervention with MLD, in addition to rehabilitation exercise, in that they yielded more benefits in lymphedema control and improvement of ROM of the neck in acute care.

摘要

背景

关于早期行手动淋巴引流(MLD)干预的临床和统计学结果存在不一致。本研究旨在比较早期康复运动与 MLD 联合康复运动在口腔癌术后患者疼痛、活动度(ROM)和淋巴水肿方面的短期疗效。

方法

2014 年 12 月至 2018 年 12 月,共 39 例接受手术的患者参与了这项随机单盲研究。其中 20 例为康复组(R 组),19 例为 MLD 联合康复组(M 组)。R 组接受 30 分钟康复干预,M 组除了在工作日接受 30 分钟 MLD 外,还接受 30 分钟康复干预。在术前、干预前和出院时评估临床指标,包括视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、颈部和肩部 ROM、超声和面部距离评估淋巴水肿,以及 Földi 和 Miller 淋巴水肿量表。

结果

干预后 VAS 疼痛评分、颈部 ROM 和右肩内、外旋均显著改善。干预后右侧面部距离(P=0.005)和双侧水平下颌骨及左侧升支下颌骨的皮肤与骨骼距离(SBD)明显改善。与康复组相比,MLD 组的左侧颈部侧屈(P=0.038)和右侧升支下颌骨 SBD(P<0.001)的改善更为显著。

结论

早期行 MLD 联合康复方案可有效改善颈部 ROM 并控制急性康复期的淋巴水肿。初步研究结果表明,早期行 MLD 干预联合康复运动可能具有治疗作用,在控制淋巴水肿和改善颈部 ROM 方面的获益更为显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a92/9592419/65f29a176461/medi-101-e30910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a92/9592419/65f29a176461/medi-101-e30910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a92/9592419/65f29a176461/medi-101-e30910-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of early interventions with manual lymphatic drainage and rehabilitation exercise on morbidity and lymphedema in patients with oral cavity cancer.早期采用手动淋巴引流和康复运动对口腔癌患者发病率和淋巴水肿的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 21;101(42):e30910. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030910.
2
Long term effects of manual lymphatic drainage and active exercises on physical morbidities, lymphoscintigraphy parameters and lymphedema formation in patients operated due to breast cancer: A clinical trial.手法淋巴引流和主动运动对乳腺癌手术患者身体疾病、淋巴闪烁造影参数及淋巴水肿形成的长期影响:一项临床试验
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0189176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189176. eCollection 2018.
3
Synergistic Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Mastectomy-Related Lymphedema.本体感觉神经肌肉促进法与手法淋巴引流对乳房切除术后淋巴水肿患者的协同作用。
Front Physiol. 2017 Nov 28;8:959. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00959. eCollection 2017.
4
Manual Lymphatic Drainage and Active Exercise Effects on Lymphatic Function Do Not Translate Into Morbidities in Women Who Underwent Breast Cancer Surgery.手法淋巴引流和主动运动对淋巴功能的影响不会转化为接受乳腺癌手术女性的发病率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.024. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
5
Manual Lymphatic Drainage May Not Have an Additional Effect on the Intensive Phase of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Trial.手法淋巴引流可能对乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿强化期没有额外作用:一项随机对照试验。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Apr;19(2):141-150. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0049. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
The efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as a substitute for manual lymphatic drainage in complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of breast cancer related lymphedema.间歇气动压迫作为完整消肿治疗中手动淋巴引流替代方法在治疗乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿中的疗效。
Lymphology. 2019;52(2):82-91.
7
Does Manual Lymphatic Drainage Add Value in Reducing Suprafascial Fluid Accumulation and Skin Elasticity in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema?手法淋巴引流是否有助于减少乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者的皮下积液和皮肤弹性?
Phys Ther. 2022 Dec 6;102(12). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac137.
8
Acute Effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage and Compression with Exercise Therapy on Breast Lymphedema Following Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy.保乳手术后放疗后辅以手法淋巴引流和运动疗法对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿的急性影响
Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Jun;21(3):283-288. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0037. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
9
Manual Lymphatic Drainage for Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.手动淋巴引流治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;22(5):e664-e673. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema in patients after breast cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.乳腺癌术后患者淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23192. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023192.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex Decongestive Therapy With Oral Adenoid Cystic Cancer: A Case Report.口腔腺样囊性癌的综合消肿治疗:一例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2025 Jul 28;13(8):e70662. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70662. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Does Kinesio taping and/or transdermal diclofenac patch reduce postoperative pain and swelling after open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures?肌内效贴布和/或双氯芬酸透皮贴剂能否减轻下颌角骨折切开复位内固定术后的疼痛和肿胀?
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jun 17;29(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01404-9.
3
Lymphedema management in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on physical therapy interventions.
头颈部癌患者的淋巴水肿管理:物理治疗干预随机对照试验的系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 26;33(5):420. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09438-1.
4
Predictors of the Efficacy of Lymphedema Decongestive Therapy.淋巴水肿减压治疗疗效的预测因素
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 27;61(2):231. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020231.
5
Various Therapies for Lymphedema and Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Including a Multimodal At-Home Nonpneumatic Compression Treatment.各种淋巴水肿和慢性静脉功能不全的治疗方法,包括一种多模式家庭非气动压迫治疗。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024 Apr 1;37(4):212-215. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000091. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
6
Evaluating the effects of lymphoedema management strategies on functional status and health-related quality of life following treatment for head and neck cancer: a systematic review.评估淋巴水肿管理策略对头颈部癌治疗后功能状态和健康相关生活质量的影响:一项系统综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb;19(1):121-139. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01453-7. Epub 2023 Aug 30.