Anderson D C
Postgrad Med. 1987 Sep 1;82(3):48-50, 52-4, 56-7. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1987.11699946.
The diagnosis of cardioembolism is always based on circumstantial evidence. Echocardiography has a limited useful yield and should be reserved for young patients or older patients with clinical heart disease. Primary prophylaxis with anticoagulants appears to be reasonable for patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction, rheumatic valvular disease, or dilated cardiomyopathy and, possibly, for those with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Secondary prophylaxis (after an initial embolism) is reasonable for the same conditions and, possibly, for mitral valve prolapse. Acute anticoagulation therapy is warranted when a large infarct is excluded by computed tomography 24 hours after a cerebral embolism.
心源性栓塞的诊断始终基于间接证据。超声心动图的诊断价值有限,应仅用于年轻患者或患有临床心脏病的老年患者。对于急性前壁心肌梗死、风湿性瓣膜病或扩张型心肌病患者,以及可能对于慢性非瓣膜性心房颤动患者,使用抗凝剂进行一级预防似乎是合理的。对于相同情况以及可能对于二尖瓣脱垂患者,二级预防(在首次栓塞后)是合理的。当脑栓塞24小时后计算机断层扫描排除大面积梗死时,有必要进行急性抗凝治疗。