Fundación de Investigación Biomédica Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
RITIP (Translational Research Network On Paediatric Infectious Diseases), Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jan;182(1):461-466. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04649-8. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
Scarce evidence exists about the best treatment for multi-system inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). We analyzed the effects of steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and their combination on the probability of discharge over time, the probability of switching to second-line treatment over time, and the persistence of fever 2 days after treatment. We did a retrospective study to investigate the effect of different treatments on children with MIS-C from 1 March 2020 to 1 June 2021. We estimated the time-to-event probability using a Cox model weighted by propensity score to balance the baseline characteristics. Thirty of 132 (22.7%) patients were initially treated with steroids alone, 29/132 (21.9%) with IVIG alone, and 73/132 (55%) with IVIG plus steroids. The probability of early discharge was higher with IVIG than with IVIG plus steroids (hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, 95% CI 1.11-2.45, p = 0.013), but with a higher probability of needing second-line therapy compared to IVIG plus steroids (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.12-8.25, p = 0.028). Patients on IVIG had a higher likelihood of persistent fever than patients on steroids (odds ratio [OR] 4.23, 95% CI 1.43-13.5, p = 0.011) or on IVIG plus steroids (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.05-9.82, p < 0.001). No differences were found for this endpoint between steroids or steroids plus IVIG. Conclusions: The benefits of each approach may vary depending on the outcome assessed. IVIG seemed to increase the probability of earlier discharge over time but also of needing second-line treatment over time. Steroids seemed to reduce persistent fever, and combination therapy reduced the need for escalating treatment. What is Known: • Steroids plus intravenous immunoglobulin, compared with intravenous immunoglobulin alone for multi-system inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) might reduce the need for hemodynamic support and the duration of fever, but the certainty of the evidence is low. What is New: • Intravenous immunoglobulin, steroids, and their combination for MIS-C may have different outcomes. • In this study, intravenous immunoglobulin increased the probability of discharge over time, steroids reduced persistent fever, while combination therapy reduced the need for second-line treatments.
关于多系统炎症综合征 (MIS-C) 的最佳治疗方法,证据有限。我们分析了类固醇、静脉注射免疫球蛋白 (IVIG) 及其联合应用对随时间推移的出院概率、随时间推移转为二线治疗的概率以及治疗后 2 天持续发热的概率的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以调查 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 1 日期间不同治疗方法对 MIS-C 患儿的影响。我们使用 Cox 模型估计时间事件概率,并通过倾向评分加权来平衡基线特征。132 例患者中,30 例(22.7%)单独使用类固醇治疗,29 例(21.9%)单独使用 IVIG 治疗,73 例(55%)联合使用 IVIG 和类固醇治疗。与 IVIG 加类固醇相比,IVIG 早期出院的可能性更高(风险比 [HR] 1.65,95%CI 1.11-2.45,p=0.013),但与 IVIG 加类固醇相比,需要二线治疗的可能性更高(HR 3.05,95%CI 1.12-8.25,p=0.028)。与使用类固醇或 IVIG 加类固醇相比,使用 IVIG 的患者持续发热的可能性更高(比值比 [OR] 4.23,95%CI 1.43-13.5,p=0.011)或使用 IVIG 加类固醇(OR 4.4,95%CI 2.05-9.82,p<0.001)。类固醇或类固醇加 IVIG 组在该终点上没有差异。结论:每种方法的益处可能因评估的结果而异。IVIG 似乎随着时间的推移增加了早期出院的可能性,但也增加了需要二线治疗的可能性。类固醇似乎降低了持续性发热,联合治疗降低了升级治疗的需要。已知的:•与单独使用静脉免疫球蛋白相比,类固醇加静脉免疫球蛋白治疗多系统炎症综合征 (MIS-C) 可能减少对血流动力学支持的需求和发热持续时间,但证据的确定性较低。新内容:•静脉免疫球蛋白、类固醇及其在 MIS-C 中的联合应用可能有不同的结果。•在这项研究中,静脉免疫球蛋白随着时间的推移增加了出院的可能性,类固醇降低了持续性发热,而联合治疗降低了二线治疗的需求。